Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/013,752

CONTAINER AND LATCHING SYSTEM

Final Rejection §102§DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Jan 08, 2025
Priority
Nov 18, 2021 — continuation of 11/738,914 +1 more
Examiner
BRADEN, SHAWN M
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
YETI Coolers LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
768 granted / 1149 resolved
-3.2% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1170
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1149 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §DOUBLEPATENT
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 8,11-13,15,18,19,21, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Seiders (USPN 11,976,498). With respect to claim 8, Seiders shows a container (2) comprising: a latch assembly (100) comprising: a latch body (102); a latch button (192) slidably connected to the latch body (102), the latch button (192) comprising: a rear surface; a front surface configured to confront and slidably move along an interior surface of the latch body (102); a bottom surface configured to provide an interface for a user to exert an upward force (arrow in fig. 10b shows force direction) ; and an interlocking pawl (176) rotatably attached to the latch body (102) and configured to prevent inadvertent movement of the latch button (192). With respect to claim 11, Seiders shows wherein the front surface includes a recess configured to hold a portion of a latch button (192) biasing member (150). With respect to claim 12, Seiders shows wherein the latch button (192) further comprises a latch button-locking member (130) extending outward from the rear surface. With respect to claim 13, Seiders shows wherein the interlocking pawl (176) is rotatably attached to the latch body (102) via a pin connection (172) and includes a pawl biasing member (138) that exerts a rotational force on the interlocking pawl (176). With respect to claim 15, Seiders shows a container (2) comprising: a lid (5); a latch assembly (100) connected to the lid, the latch assembly (100) comprising: a latch body (102) having an upper edge and a lower edge; a latch button (192) slidably connected to the latch body (102); an interlocking pawl (176) rotatably attached to the latch body (102) via a pin connection (172); and a pawl biasing member (138) exerting a rotational force on the interlocking pawl (176); and wherein the interlocking pawl (176) prevents the latch button (192) from moving upward when the latch assembly (100) is in an unlocked position. With respect to claim 18, Seiders shows wherein the latch body (102) includes a pawl receiver (where 176 is placed is the receiver) configured to receive the pin connection (132) and the pawl biasing member (138). With respect to claim 19, Seiders shows wherein the lid (5) includes an engagement region having a curved surface (112) configured to engage with the interlocking pawl (176). With respect to claim 21, Seiders shows wherein rotary motion of the interlocking pawl (176) is controlled by interaction between a curved outer surface (112) of the interlocking pawl (176) and the lid (5). Response to Arguments Examiner agrees with the arguments against the double patenting rejection and has removed the double patenting rejection. Applicants’ arguments filed 08/31/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the effective filing date of the reference is after the current applications filing date, PNG media_image1.png 326 512 media_image1.png Greyscale Following the MPEP under (a) (2) copied above the Effective filing date of Seiders (USPN 11,976,498) is 04/03/2020 . Which is before the effective filing date by more than 1 year of the current application’s effective filing date (11/18/2021). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7, allowed. Claims 9,10,14,16,17,20, are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicants are reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAWN M BRADEN whose telephone number is (571)272-8026. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E Aviles-Bosques can be reached at 571 270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAWN M BRADEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §DOUBLEPATENT
Aug 31, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12759786
COLLAPSIBLE CONTAINER
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758467
Container
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12747082
PRESSURE RELIEF CONTAINER FOR FOOD TO BE HEATED AND BOX HAVING SAID CONTAINER
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747074
CHILD-RESISTANT CONTAINER
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741794
COLLATION OF PACKAGES AND METHOD OF RETAINING PACKAGES TOGETHER IN A COLLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.3%)
2y 10m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1149 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month