Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/014,179

ELECTRIC PARK SYSTEMS, TRANSMISSIONS INCORPORATING THE SAME, AND METHODS FOR TRANSMISSIONS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 08, 2025
Priority
Sep 28, 2022 — continuation of 12/247,658
Examiner
RUSHING, JR, BOBBY
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Allison Transmission Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
393 granted / 514 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
552
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 514 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on August 20, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 and 7-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Smetana (DE 10 2011 088 669) in view of Deng et al. (CN 108317248). Smetana discloses and shows at Figs. 1 and 2 a transmission comprising: an input shaft (2a) to receive torque from a drive unit (2); an output shaft (29) to transmit torque to a load (5); and a park system to selectively brake the output shaft that includes a nut (19) translatable along a first longitudinal axis (about spindle 18) that is driven by an actuator to cause the translation of the nut along the first longitudinal axis, a sleeve (11) coupled to the nut and translatable along a second longitudinal axis, and a lever (20) interconnecting the nut and the sleeve to coordinate movement of the nut along the first longitudinal axis with movement of the sleeve along the second longitudinal axis, wherein a pair of stationary hangers (15) limit translation of the nut along the first longitudinal axis. The actuator is disposed on an axis perpendicular to and vertically above the first longitudinal axis. Smetana also requires an angle drive which complicates the system and increases costs. Deng discloses and shows a park system including a nut (22) translatable along a first longitudinal axis that is driven by an actuator (10) also disposed on the first longitudinal axis to cause translation of the nut along the first longitudinal axis, the actuator disposed on the first longitudinal axis reduces axial space requirements, yielding a smaller gear case with a simple and cost effective actuator. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Smetana’s transmission to where the actuator is disposed on the same axis as the as spindle and nut, the arrangement reduces axial space requirements, yielding a smaller gear case with a simple and cost-effective actuator. Cl. 2 – the first and second longitudinal axes are spaced apart from one another in a radial direction. Cl. 3 – the lever extends at an angle to a vertical axis to interconnect the nut and the sleeve. Cl. 4 – the lever is pivotally coupled to a stationary structure (21) at a pivot point disposed between the nut and the sleeve in the radial direction. Cl. 5 – the lever includes a ring received by a post of the stationary structure. Cl. 7 – the lever extends between the nut and the sleeve at an angle to each of the first and second longitudinal axes. Cl. 8 – the lever extends between the nut and the sleeve at an angle to a vertical axis. Cl. 9 – the lever is pivotally coupled to a stationary structure at a pivot point disposed between the nut and the sleeve in a radial direction. Cl. 10 – Smetana discloses and shows at Figs. 1 and 2 a park system to selectively brake an output shaft of a transmission, the park system comprising: a park actuation assembly having a park gear (37) in direct contact with the output shaft (2a), an electric (2) actuator to supply rotational power, and an actuation linkage coupled between the electric actuator and the park actuation assembly including a nut (19) translatable along a first longitudinal axis (about spindle 18), a sleeve (11) coupled to the nut and translatable along a second longitudinal axis, and a lever (20) interconnecting the nut and the sleeve to coordinate movement of the nut along the first longitudinal axis with movement of the sleeve along the second longitudinal axis. wherein: a pair of hangers (15) limit translation of the nut along the first longitudinal axis; each of the pair of hangers is a stationary structure surrounding the first longitudinal axis. The actuator is disposed on an axis perpendicular to and vertically above the first longitudinal axis. Smetana also requires an angle drive which complicates the system and increases costs. Deng discloses and shows a park system including a nut (22) translatable along a first longitudinal axis that is driven by an actuator (10) also disposed on the first longitudinal axis to cause translation of the nut along the first longitudinal axis, the actuator disposed on the first longitudinal axis reduces axial space requirements, yielding a smaller gear case with a simple and cost effective actuator. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Smetana’s transmission to where the actuator is disposed on the same axis as the as spindle and nut, the arrangement reduces axial space requirements, yielding a smaller gear case with a simple and cost-effective actuator. Cl. 11 – the first and second longitudinal axes are parallel to one another. Cl. 12 – the first and second longitudinal axes are spaced apart from one another in a radial direction. Cl. 13 – the lever extends at an angle to a vertical axis to interconnect the nut and the sleeve. Claims 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Smetana in view Deng et al., as applied to claim 10, and further in view of Greb et al. (DE 10 2018 132 374). Smetana and Dang disclose and show the invention of claim 10 as described elsewhere above. Regarding claims 14 and 15, neither Smetana nor Deng include a rod supporting the sleeve. Greb discloses and shows a park system where an actuation linkage further comprises a rod (44) supporting a sleeve (47) that is adapted for translation along the second longitudinal axis, the rod prevents lateral displacement and bending (pg. 10, 3rd full paragraph). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the Smetana/Deng system to include a rod supporting the sleeve that is adapted for translation along the second longitudinal axis, the rod preventing against lateral displacement and bending as taught by Greb. Cl. 15 – the actuation linkage further comprises a collar affixed to the rod for translation therewith along the second longitudinal axis (Greb, Fig. 2, flared end of rod, 44). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 17-20 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1 and 10 have been considered but are moot in view of new grounds. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BOBBY RUSHING, JR whose telephone number is (571)270-0501. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minnah Seoh can be reached at (571) 270-7778. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BOBBY RUSHING, JR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 26, 2026
Response Filed
May 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768436
POWER TRANSMISSION MECHANISM, DRIVE SYSTEM, AND OUTPUT UNIT
1y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760795
PROPULSION SYSTEM PROVIDED WITH A LOCKING DEVICE, SUCH AS A PARKING BRAKE
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12751778
CONTINUUM ROBOT SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753827
AN IMPROVED GEARBOX FOR A POWERED RUNNING BOARD
1y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12746078
PRELOADED SURGICAL INSTRUMENT INTERFACE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 514 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month