Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/014,179

ELECTRIC PARK SYSTEMS, TRANSMISSIONS INCORPORATING THE SAME, AND METHODS FOR TRANSMISSIONS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jan 08, 2025
Priority
Sep 28, 2022 — continuation of 12/247,658
Examiner
RUSHING, JR, BOBBY
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Allison Transmission, Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
377 granted / 496 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
519
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
75.0%
+35.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 496 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on Jan. 8, 2025 has been considered by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-13 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Smetana (DE 10 2011 088 669). Smetana discloses and shows at Figs. 1 and 2 a transmission comprising: an input shaft (2a) to receive torque from a drive unit (2); an output shaft (28) to transmit torque to a load (5); and a park system to selectively brake the output shaft that includes a nut (19) translatable along a first longitudinal axis (about spindle 18), a sleeve (11) coupled to the nut and translatable along a second longitudinal axis, and a lever (20) interconnecting the nut and the sleeve to coordinate movement of the nut along the first longitudinal axis with movement of the sleeve along the second longitudinal axis. Cl. 2 – the first and second longitudinal axes are spaced apart from one another in a radial direction. Cl. 3 – the lever extends at an angle to a vertical axis to interconnect the nut and the sleeve. Cl. 4 – the lever is pivotally coupled to a stationary structure (21) at a pivot point disposed between the nut and the sleeve in the radial direction. Cl. 5 – the lever includes a ring received by a post of the stationary structure. Cl. 6 – at least one hanger limits translation of the nut along the first longitudinal axis (to act as an end stop and prevent to the nut from traveling in the housing (15) and gear (17) at opposite ends of the spindle). Cl. 7 – the lever extends between the nut and the sleeve at an angle to each of the first and second longitudinal axes. Cl. 8 – the lever extends between the nut and the sleeve at an angle to a vertical axis. Cl. 9 – the lever is pivotally coupled to a stationary structure at a pivot point disposed between the nut and the sleeve in a radial direction. Cl. 10 – Smetana discloses and shows at Figs. 1 and 2 a park system to selectively brake an output shaft of a transmission, the park system comprising: a park actuation assembly having a park gear (37) in direct contact with the output shaft (2a), an electric (2) actuator to supply rotational power, and an actuation linkage coupled between the electric actuator and the park actuation assembly including a nut (19) translatable along a first longitudinal axis (about spindle 18), a sleeve (11) coupled to the nut and translatable along a second longitudinal axis, and a lever (20) interconnecting the nut and the sleeve to coordinate movement of the nut along the first longitudinal axis with movement of the sleeve along the second longitudinal axis. Cl. 11 – the first and second longitudinal axes are parallel to one another. Cl. 12 – the first and second longitudinal axes are spaced apart from one another in a radial direction. Cl. 13 – the lever extends at an angle to a vertical axis to interconnect the nut and the sleeve. Cl. 16 – a pair of hangers limit translation of the nut along the first longitudinal axis (to act as an end stop and prevent to the nut from traveling in the housing (15) and gear (17) at opposite ends of the spindle). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Smetana (DE 10 2011 088 669) in view of Greb et al. (DE 10 2018 132 374 ). Regarding claims 14 and 15, Smetana does not specify a rod supporting the sleeve. Greb discloses and shows a park system where an actuation linkage further comprises a rod (44) supporting a sleeve (47) that is adapted for translation along the second longitudinal axis, the rod prevents against lateral displacement and bending (pg. 10, 3rd full paragraph). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the Smetana system to include a rod supporting the sleeve that is adapted for translation along the second longitudinal axis, the rod preventing against lateral displacement and bending as taught by Greb. Cl. 15 – the actuation linkage further comprises a collar affixed to the rod for translation therewith along the second longitudinal axis (Greb, Fig. 2, flared end of rod, 44). Claims 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Smetana (DE 10 2011 088 669) in view of Deng et al. (CN 108317248). Regarding claim 17, Smetana discloses and shows at Figs. 1 and 2 a park system to selectively brake an output shaft of a transmission, the park system comprising: a park actuation assembly having a park gear (37) in direct contact with the output shaft (2a), an electric (2) actuator to supply rotational power, and an actuation linkage coupled between the electric actuator and the park actuation assembly including a nut (19) translatable along a first longitudinal axis (about spindle 18), a sleeve (11) coupled to the nut and translatable along a second longitudinal axis, and a lever (20) interconnecting the nut and the sleeve to coordinate movement of the nut along the first longitudinal axis with movement of the sleeve along the second longitudinal axis. Smetana does not include a spring in direct contact with the sleeve. Deng discloses and shows a park system to selectively brake an output shaft of a transmission which includes a sleeve arranged parallel to an actuation unit included an actuator, screw and nut on a first axis to coordinate movement of the sleeve about a second, parallel axis, the sleeve is arranged in direct contact with a spring 33 to bias the sleeve away from movement along the second longitudinal axis toward the park actuation assembly (40), the spring provides a simple structure while allowing for stable and reliable movement (page 5, 6th full paragraph). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the Smetana park system to where the sleeve is arranged in direct contact with a spring to bias the sleeve away from movement along the second longitudinal axis toward the park actuation assembly to provide a simple structure while allowing for stable and reliable movement as taught by Deng. Cl. 18 – the sleeve includes two lobes (dashed lines at 11) arranged opposite one another and a core (at end of lever, 20) interconnecting the two lobes. Cl. 19 – each of the two lobes has a diameter greater than a diameter of the core. Cl. 20 – the lever is directly coupled to the nut at one end thereof, and the lever is directly coupled to the sleeve at another end thereof opposite the one end. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BOBBY RUSHING, JR whose telephone number is (571)270-0501. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minnah Seoh can be reached at (571) 270-7778. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BOBBY RUSHING, JR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Feb 26, 2026
Response Filed
May 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636798
Robot, Ceiling Mounted Type Robot And Robot System
1y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12624621
HYBRID ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION FOR HYDRAULIC FRACTURING
1y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618455
Bevel Gear Pair With Constant Meshing Characteristics Constructed Tooth Pair
2y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12607256
SELF-LOCKING DRIVE AND LINEAR ACTUATOR
1y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12595840
Transmission for a Coaxial Two-Machine Electric Drive of a Motor Vehicle
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 5m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 496 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month