Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/014,352

RIGHTING DEVICE FOR FLOATING UNIT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 09, 2025
Priority
Mar 11, 2024 — JP 2024-037366
Examiner
OLSON, LARS A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1579 granted / 1928 resolved
+21.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1938
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1928 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings were received on January 9, 2025. These drawings are acceptable. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on January 9, 2025 and June 24, 2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. On lines 1-2 of claim 1, the phrase “(where n is a natural number of 2 or more)” is disclosed in parentheses, which renders the claim language indefinite. The use of parentheses in the claims is reserved for reference characters only. On line 8 of claim 1, the phrase “(where m is a natural number smaller than n)” is disclosed in parentheses, which renders the claim language indefinite. The term “relatively great depth” in claim 1 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “relatively great” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claims 2-4 depend from independent claim 1, and are thus also rendered indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wenstob et al. (US 4,919,067). Wenstob et al. discloses the same righting device for a floating vessel as claimed, as shown in Figures 1-8, which is comprised of a self-righting boat with first and second pontoons, defined as Parts #1 and 2, a liquid injection unit, defined as Parts #6 and 8, as shown in Figures 3-5, that is configured to inject water into one of said pontoons in order to selectively cause said pontoon to serve as ballast, a liquid displacement unit, defined as Parts A, #8 and 10, as shown in Figures 6-8, that is configured to selectively displace said injected water from said pontoon with a gas in order to selectively cause said pontoon to float, and a control unit, defined as Part #9, that controls said liquid injection unit in case of a capsizing, as shown in Figures 3-5, and said liquid displacement unit when said floating vessel is righted from said capsizing, as shown in Figures 6-8. Said control unit is further comprised of a solenoid, a mercury switch, a computer, or other similar means which are responsive to the angular orientation of said floating vessel, and which generate a control signal in order to activate or deactivate a motor, defined as Part #30, of a compressor, defined as Part #8, as described in lines 40-54 of column 4, when a capsizing is detected, or when a righting is detected. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LARS A OLSON whose telephone number is (571) 272-6685. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 8:00am - 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MARC JIMENEZ can be reached at 571-272-4530. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. September 21, 2026 /LARS A OLSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615B
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735158
WATERWAY SENSOR
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736669
SUBMERSIBLE DEVICE FOR UNDERWATER SONAR IMAGERY
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735153
INTEGRATED PRODUCTION COMPLEX ON A GRAVITY-BASED STRUCTURE (GBS)
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12714165
Backpack for Fall Protection
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12714092
BOAT HUNTING BLIND INCLUDING A SPRING-LOADED AUTO-LEVELING LEG WITH DUAL ACTION TOP
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.0%)
1y 11m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1928 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month