Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 19/014,639

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PLAYER REIDENTIFICATION IN BROADCAST VIDEO

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jan 09, 2025
Priority
Feb 28, 2019 — provisional 62/811,889 +4 more
Examiner
OSINSKI, MICHAEL S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Stats LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
477 granted / 631 resolved
+15.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
641
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION 1. The following Office action is in response to communications filed on 1/9/2025. Claims 1-20 are currently pending within this application. Information Disclosure Statement 2. The information disclosure statement(s) filed on 1/9/2025 is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97, and has/have been considered and a copy/copies is/are enclosed with this Office action. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). 3. Claims 1-20 of the instant application are rejected on the grounds of non-statutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of US Patent 11586840 (hereafter ‘840). 4. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the subject matter claimed in the instant application is broader and fully incorporated within the claims of the patented application. Claims 1-20 of the instant application are anticipated in the limitations of claims 1-20 of cited patent ‘840. The claims of the instant application are broader than those of cited patent ‘840 and merely omit certain limitations in the claims of the cited patent ‘840. Instant Application Claim 1 US Patent 11586840 Claim 1 A method comprising: retrieving, by a computing system, a broadcast video feed for a sporting event, the broadcast video feed comprising a plurality of video frames; generating, by the computing system, a plurality of tracks based on the plurality of video frames, wherein each track comprises a plurality of image patches associated with at least one player, each image patch of the plurality of image patches being a subset of a corresponding frame of the plurality of video frames; connecting, by the computing system, the plurality of tracks by generating a motion field that estimates player motion across a set of video frames of the plurality of video frames; constructing, by the computing system, a predicted motion for each player in the broadcast video feed based on the motion field for a respective player; and generating, by the computing system, a graphical representation of the predicted motion for each player across a respective set of video frames. A method, comprising: retrieving, by a computing system, a broadcast video feed for a sporting event, the broadcast video feed comprising a plurality of video frames; generating, by the computing system, a plurality of tracks based on the plurality of video frames, wherein each track comprises a plurality of image patches associated with at least one player, each image patch of the plurality of image patches being a subset of a corresponding frame of the plurality of video frames; connecting, by the computing system, gaps between sets of tracks of the plurality of tracks, the connecting comprising generating a motion field that estimates player motion across a set of video frames of the plurality of video frames; constructing, by the computing system, a predicted motion for each player in the broadcast video feed based on the motion field for a respective player; and generating, by the computing system, a graphical representation of the predicted motion for each player across a respective set of video frames. Table 1 Instant Application Claim 8 US Patent 11586840 Claim 8 A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising one or more sequences of instructions, which, when executed by one or more processors, causes a computing system to perform operations, comprising: retrieving, by the computing system, a broadcast video feed for a sporting event, the broadcast video feed comprising a plurality of video frames; generating, by the computing system, a plurality of tracks based on the plurality of video frames, wherein each track comprises a plurality of image patches associated with at least one player, each image patch of the plurality of image patches being a subset of a corresponding frame of the plurality of video frames; connecting, by the computing system, the plurality of tracks by generating a motion field that estimates player motion across a set of video frames of the plurality of video frames; constructing, by the computing system, a predicted motion for each player in the broadcast video feed based on the motion field for a respective player; and generating, by the computing system, a graphical representation of the predicted motion for each player across a respective set of video frames. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising one or more sequences of instructions, which, when executed by one or more processors, causes a computing system to perform operations, comprising: retrieving, by the computing system, a broadcast video feed for a sporting event, the broadcast video feed comprising a plurality of video frames; generating, by the computing system, a plurality of tracks based on the plurality of video frames, wherein each track comprises a plurality of image patches associated with at least one player, each image patch of the plurality of image patches being a subset of a corresponding frame of the plurality of video frames; connecting, by the computing system, gaps between sets of tracks of the plurality of tracks, the connecting comprising generating a motion field that estimates player motion across a set of video frames of the plurality of video frames; constructing, by the computing system, a predicted motion for each player in the broadcast video feed based on the motion field for a respective player; and generating, by the computing system, a graphical representation of the predicted motion for each player across a respective set of video frames. Table 2 Instant Application Claim 15 US Patent 11586840 Claim 15 A system comprising: a processor; and a memory having programming instructions stored thereon, which, when executed by the processor, causes the system to perform operations comprising: retrieving a broadcast video feed for a sporting event, the broadcast video feed comprising a plurality of video frames; generating a plurality of tracks based on the plurality of video frames, wherein each track comprises a plurality of image patches associated with at least one player, each image patch of the plurality of image patches being a subset of a corresponding frame of the plurality of video frames; connecting the plurality of tracks by generating a motion field that estimates player motion across a set of video frames of the plurality of video frames; constructing a predicted motion for each player in the broadcast video feed based on the motion field for a respective player; and generating a graphical representation of the predicted motion for each player across a respective set of video frames. A system comprising: a processor; and a memory having programming instructions stored thereon, which, when executed by the processor, causes the system to perform operations comprising: retrieving a broadcast video feed for a sporting event, the broadcast video feed comprising a plurality of video frames; generating a plurality of tracks based on the plurality of video frames, wherein each track comprises a plurality of image patches associated with at least one player, each image patch of the plurality of image patches being a subset of a corresponding frame of the plurality of video frames; connecting gaps between sets of tracks of the plurality of tracks, the connecting comprising generating a motion field that estimates player motion across a set of video frames of the plurality of video frames; constructing a predicted motion for each player in the broadcast video feed based on the motion field for a respective player; and generating a graphical representation of the predicted motion for each player across a respective set of video frames. Table 3 5. As can be seen in Tables 1-3, each of the claimed limitations of independent claims 1, 8, and 15 of the instant application are included within the claimed limitations of claims 1, 8, and 15 of cited patent '840. Additionally, claims 2-7, 9-14, and 16-20 of the instant application are anticipated by claims 1-20 of cited patent ‘840. Conclusion 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL S OSINSKI whose telephone number is (571) 270-3949. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday, 10:00am - 6:00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nay Maung can be reached on 571-272-7882. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MO /MICHAEL S OSINSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2674 8/4/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705707
Video Background Blur Using Location Data
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700095
METHOD FOR PREDICTING STATE OF OBJECT ON BASIS OF DYNAMIC IMAGE DATA AND COMPUTING DEVICE PERFORMING SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700261
MARKERLESS MOTION CAPTURE
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696568
IMAGE SENSING DEVICE AND METHOD OF IMAGE SIGNAL PROCESSING
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12694718
GENERATION METHOD AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+22.9%)
2y 9m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month