Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/015,062

ORAL SCANNER SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112§DP
Filed
Jan 09, 2025
Priority
Jul 04, 2022 — CN PCT/CN2022/103552 +6 more
Examiner
WENDMAGEGN, GIRUMSEW
Art Unit
2484
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Braun GmbH
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
757 granted / 984 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
1008
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§103
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 984 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-15 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-13, 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims1, 2,4, 9, 12, 13, 15, the phrase "preferably” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Regarding claim5, 13, 15, the phrase "such as" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Dependent claims are rejected because it depends on rejected claims. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim s 1-4, are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1,3,5 of copending Application No. 19/015,042 (reference application). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of the copending application anticipate the claims of the present application. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. Co-pending Application No.19/015,042 Present Application No.19/015,062 Claim1 recites an oral scanner system comprising: an oral scanner being structured and/or arranged for performing a scanning procedure of at least a portion of an oral cavity of a subject using an oral health sensor structured and/or arranged for outputting oral health sensor data acquired during the scanning procedure; a processor structured and/or arranged to receive the oral health sensor data to determine control data for an oral care device in dependence on the oral health sensor data; the oral care device selected from the group consisting of manual or electric toothbrushes. (electric) flossers, (electric) irrigators, (electric) tongue cleaners, and (electric) gum massagers, the oral care device being different to the oral scanner structured and/or arranged for performing an oral care activity, the oral care device comprising at least two different operational settings; wherein the processor is coupled with a processor communicator and the oral care device comprises a device communicator, where the processor communicator and the device communicator are structured and/or arranged for at least unidirectional communication from the processor to the oral care device; wherein the processor is structured and/or arranged to send the control data to the oral care device; and the oral care device is structured and/or arranged to select at least one of the at least two operational settings based on the control data in a subsequent oral care activity performed by the oral care device after the completion of the scanning procedure. Claim4 the oral scanner system in accordance with claim 1, further comprising a position detector structured and/or arranged for outputting position sensor data relating to a position or location at which the oral scanner is currently performing the scanning procedure or performed the scanning procedure at a given time instant; and wherein the processor is structured and/or arranged to receive the position sensor data, to determine at least one discrete position or location from at least two discrete positions or locations of the at least portion of the oral cavity at which the oral scanner is currently performing the scanning procedure or performed the scanning procedure at the given time instant, to assign the oral health sensor data to the one discrete position or location from the at least two positions or locations determined by the processor and to determine the control data in a position-resolved or location-resolved manner. Claim1 recites an oral scanner system comprising: an oral scanner structured and/or arranged for performing a scanning procedure of at least a portion of an oral cavity using at least one oral health sensor structured and/or arranged for outputting oral health sensor data acquired during the scanning procedure relating to at least one oral health condition; a position detector structured and/or arranged for outputting position sensor data relating to a position or location at which the oral scanner currently performs the scanning procedure or has performed the scanning procedure at a given time instant; a processor structured and/or arranged to receive the oral health sensor data and the position sensor data, to process the position sensor data to determine at least one discrete position or location from at least two discrete positions or locations of the at least portion of the oral cavity at which the oral scanner is currently performing the scanning procedure or has performed the scanning procedure at the given time instant, and to assign the oral health sensor data to the determined discrete position or location and/or to process the oral health sensor data to determine oral health data relating to the at least one oral health condition and to assign the oral health data to the determined discrete position or location; and a feedback unit structured and/or arranged to provide feedback about the oral health sensor data and/or the oral health data for the at least two discrete positions or locations during the scanning procedure, preferably as a live or real-time feedback; and an oral care device (700C) having an oral care device communicator, wherein the processor (200) is structured and/or arranged to determine, at the end of the scanning procedure, control data based on the oral health sensor data acquired during the scanning procedure, and to send the control data to the oral care device (700C) via the oral care device communicator, and wherein the oral care device (700C) is structured and/or arranged to select at least one from at least two operational settings of the oral care device (700C) in dependence on the control data. Claim5 recites the oral scanner system in accordance with claim 4, wherein the position sensor comprises at least one of an accelerometer or gyroscope, preferably wherein the accelerometer or gyroscope is realized as a MEMS sensor. Claim2 recites the oral scanner system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the position sensor comprises at least one of an accelerometer or gyroscope, preferably wherein the accelerometer or gyroscope is realized as a MEMS sensor. Claim3 recites… wherein the oral health sensor is an optical sensor, Claim3 recites the oral scanner system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the oral health sensor is an optical sensor. Claim3 recites the oral scanner system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the oral health sensor is an optical sensor, preferably comprising an M times N array of light sensitive sensor elements, further preferably wherein the optical sensor is a camera. Claim4 recites the oral scanner system in accordance with claim 3, wherein the oral health sensor comprises an M time N array of light sensitive sensor elements, preferably wherein the optical sensor is a camera. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GIRUMSEW WENDMAGEGN whose telephone number is (571)270-1118. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00-7:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thai Tran can be reached at (571) 272-7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GIRUMSEW WENDMAGEGN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2484 /GIRUMSEW WENDMAGEGN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2484
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112, §DP
Jun 17, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750461
SMART BEACON VIDEO-BASED COMMUNICATION PROTOCOL
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744968
INTELLIGENT MEDIA CONTENT PLAYBACK
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744863
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECORDING A SUPER SLOW MOTION VIDEO IN A PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738299
DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS AND DATA PROCESSING METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732600
INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+21.2%)
2y 11m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 984 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month