Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/015,079

POWER TOOL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 09, 2025
Examiner
LEEDS, DANIEL JEREMY
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Stanley Black & Decker Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
203 granted / 298 resolved
-1.9% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
351
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§102
31.9%
-8.1% vs TC avg
§112
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 298 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 2, Figs. 6-20, in the reply filed on 1/21/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 14 and 20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 1/21/2026. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-19 are allowed. Claims 4-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 7, 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wu, US 20240100664. Regarding claim 1, Wu discloses: A power tool (Fig. 1, power tool 1), comprising: a housing (Fig. 4, housing 10); a motor (Fig. 4, power body 21) in the housing; an accessory holder ([0002], “ tool head”) configured to hold a power tool accessory and driven by the motor; a torque tube (Fig. 4, inner casing socket 40) in the housing; a strain gauge (Fig. 4, torque sensor 60) on the torque tube; a controller ([0025], “the control board is electrically connected to the power body 21 and the torque sensor 60.”); wherein the controller is configured to control operation of the motor based at least in part on a measurement from the strain gauge ([0026] “After the operation of the power body 21 has exceeded a predetermined torque, the control board receives a signal transmitted from the torque sensor 60 and immediately stop the operation of the power body 21.”); wherein the torque tube has a first end (Fig.3, front side 41) and a second end (Fig.3, rear side 42) opposite the first end; wherein the second end of the torque tube is rotationally fixed to the housing ([0021], “The rear fixing plate 222 is fixed onto the inner casing socket 40 through the rear locking members 24 passing through the fourth locking holes 4210 and the third locking holes 2220.”). Regarding claim 2, Wu further discloses: the second end of the torque tube has splines (see Fig. 3. The shape of the front flange 411 acts as mounting splines on the outer casing). Regarding claim 3, Wu further discloses: the splines engage an inner portion of the housing ([0023], “the front flange 411 of the inner casing socket 40 is fixed to an inner wall of the outer casing 10, and the rear baffle 421 of the inner casing socket 40 is attached to an inner wall of the outer casing 10. Since the inner casing front side 41 is fixed onto the outer casing 10, therefore when the inner casing rear side 42 is rotated, it will not drive the inner casing front side 41 to rotate altogether.”). Regarding claim 7, Wu further discloses: the strain gauge is on a necked down section of the torque tube (see Fig. 3). Regarding claim 9, Wu further discloses: the accessory holder is a bit holder ([0002], “ tool head” – as this device is a torque wrench type device, it is inherent that this device is attached to a bot of some type to perform its function). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 10-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nussbaumer, DE 3222161 in view of Wu, US 20240100664. Regarding claim 10, Nussbaumer discloses: A power tool (Fig. 1, Pneumatic Torque Wrench), comprising: a housing (Fig. 1, housing 10); a motor (Fig. 1, motor 18) in the housing; an accessory holder (Fig. 1, tool 24) configured to hold a power tool accessory and driven by the motor; a torque tube (Fig. 1, connecting portion 12) in the housing; strain gauges (Fig. 1, torque sensor 34/strain gauge 36) on the torque tube; a controller (Fig. 1, strain measuring circuit 42); the torque tube comprises a front section (Fig.1, holding flange 14), a rear section (Fig.1, unlabeled flange on right side of drawing opposite 14) and a central section between the front section and the rear section (Fig. 1, connecting portion 12); wherein the front section is configured to engage a bearing (Fig. 1, bearing 32); wherein the rear section is configured to engage the housing (see Fig. 1,); wherein the strain gauges are on the central section (see Fig, 1); and wherein an outer diameter of the central section is at least five percent smaller than an outer diameter of the rear section (see Fig. 1. While drawings are not necessarily to scale, as the flange portion is several times larger in diameter than the central portion, the claim limitation is met). Nussbaumer does not explicitly disclose: the controller is configured to control operation of the motor based at least in part on measurements from the strain gauges. Wu teaches: the controller is configured to control operation of the motor based at least in part on measurements from the strain gauges ([0026] “After the operation of the power body 21 has exceeded a predetermined torque, the control board receives a signal transmitted from the torque sensor 60 and immediately stop the operation of the power body 21.”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to utilize the control systems as taught by Wu in combination with the Nussbaumer device, thereby combining prior art elements to achieve a predictable result. The benefit of this alteration is that combining these features allows for automated utilization of the data taken by the gauge to prevent damage to the tool or a workpiece Regarding claim 11, the modified Nussbaumer further discloses: the outer diameter of the central section is at least ten percent smaller than the outer diameter of the rear section (see Fig. 1. While drawings are not necessarily to scale, as the flange portion is several times larger in diameter than the central portion, the claim limitation is met). Regarding claim 12, the modified Nussbaumer further discloses: the outer diameter of the central section is at least fifteen percent smaller than the outer diameter of the rear section(see Fig. 1. While drawings are not necessarily to scale, as the flange portion is several times larger in diameter than the central portion, the claim limitation is met). Regarding claim 13, the modified Nussbaumer further discloses: a transmission (Fig. 1, gearbox 20); and a gearbox housing at least a portion of the transmission (see Examiner Illustration 1); wherein the torque tube surrounds at least a portion of the gearbox (see Examiner Illustration 1). PNG media_image1.png 450 770 media_image1.png Greyscale Examiner Illustration 1 Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nussbaumer, DE 3222161 in view of Wu, US 20240100664, further in view of Wang, US 20200164495. Regarding claim 15, the modified Nussbaumer discloses the device of claim 10. The modified Nussmauner does not explicitly disclose: the strain gauges are disposed at a 45-degree angle with respect to a longitudinal axis of the torque tube. Wang teaches: the strain gauges are disposed at a 45-degree angle with respect to a longitudinal axis of the torque tube (see Fig. 3). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to utilize the angled strain gauges as taught by Wang in combination with the Nussbaumer device, thereby combining prior art elements to achieve a predictable result. The benefit of this alteration is that combining these features allows for a single gauge set to measure relative strain in all directions on the plain of the gauge. The Examiner further notes that this is not only common, but it is in fact the norm regarding strain gauges. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL JEREMY LEEDS whose telephone number is (571)272-2095. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs, 0730-1730. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Kinsaul can be reached at 571-270-1926. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL JEREMY LEEDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601235
RETRIEVABLE WASTE CAPSULES, RETRIEVAL-TOOL, SYSTEMS AND METHODS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600022
POWER TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597666
NOSECONE TO BATTERY CONNECTION IN POWER TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583091
POWER TOOL AND A TRANSMISSION THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583069
ROTARY POWER TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+36.5%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 298 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month