Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/015,192

CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM WITH BELT TENSIONING MECHANISM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 09, 2025
Priority
Oct 06, 2020 — provisional 63/088,051 +2 more
Examiner
GABLER, PHILIP F
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Britax Child Safety Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
913 granted / 1247 resolved
+13.2% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
1290
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
73.8%
+33.8% vs TC avg
§102
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1247 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Van Geer et al. (US Patent Number 8573695). Regarding claim 1, Van Geer discloses a child seat (see at least the abstract, Figures 5, 6, etc.) configured to be secured to a car seat, the child seat comprising: a base (1) comprising a first side, a second side opposite the first side, and a receiving region (generally central region) between the first side and the second side, wherein the base is configured to receive a belt (22) of the car seat from the first side to the second side and within the receiving region; and a tensioning mechanism (including 9, 30, etc.) pivotably attached to the base within the receiving region, wherein the tensioning mechanism is adjustable between a first configuration and a second configuration, wherein, in the first configuration, the tensioning mechanism is configured to receive a portion of the belt (as in Figure 1), wherein, in the second configuration, the tensioning mechanism is configured to apply tension to the portion of the belt (as in Figure 2), and wherein, in both the first configuration and the second configuration, the tensioning mechanism and the base define a tortuous, nonlinear belt pathway from the first side of the base to the second side of the base (this is the general arrangement; see figures). Regarding claim 2, Van Geer further discloses the tensioning mechanism comprises a first arm (30) and a second arm (32 and/or 9) pivotably attached to the first arm, wherein, in the first configuration, first arm extends at a first angle relative to the second arm, and in the second configuration, the first arm extends at a second angle relative to the second arm that is different from the first angle (see at least Figures 1 and 2). Regarding claim 3, Van Geer further discloses the tensioning mechanism comprises a bottom arm (32) and a top arm (30), wherein the bottom arm is pivotably connected to the base (at least via 9 for instance) within the receiving region, and wherein the top arm is pivotably connected to the bottom arm (at 33). Regarding claim 4, Van Geer further discloses the bottom arm comprises a first end (at 34) and a second end (at 33) opposite from the first end, wherein the top arm comprises a first end and a second end opposite from the first end, wherein the first end of the bottom arm is pivotably attached to the base (at 9), and wherein the second end of the bottom arm is pivotably attached to the top arm between the first end and the second end of the top arm (see at least Figure 1 showing connection 33 between ends of 30). Regarding claim 5, Van Geer further discloses the top arm further comprises a top side and a bottom side, and wherein the second end of the bottom arm is pivotably attached to the bottom side of the top arm between the first end and the second end of the top arm (see again Figure 1 showing this arrangement). Regarding claim 6, Van Geer further discloses the top arm further comprises a front end, a back end opposite the front end, a top side, and a bottom side opposite the top side, and wherein the belt pathway is defined between the bottom side of the top arm and the base and between the bottom arm and the front end of the top arm (this is the general arrangement; see again Figure 1). Regarding claim 7, Van Geer discloses a child seat (see at least the abstract, Figures 5, 6, etc.) configured to be secured to a car seat, the child seat comprising: a base (1) comprising a first side, a second side opposite the first side, and a receiving region (generally central region) between the first side and the second side, wherein the base is configured to receive a belt (22) of the car seat from the first side to the second side and within the receiving region; and a tensioning mechanism (including 9, 30, etc.) pivotably attached to the base within the receiving region (see figures). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure because it shows a range of related devices. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHILIP F GABLER whose telephone number is (571)272-2155. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00 - 4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 571-272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHILIP F GABLER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679253
Vehicle Seat Assembly With Swivel Mechanism
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673589
ZERO-GRAVITY SEAT AND VEHICLE COMPRISING SAME
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673588
VERTICAL LATCH LOCKING MECHANISM FOR ROTATING SEAT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668161
A PANEL FOR A SEAT
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654794
HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE SEAT POSTS FOR BICYCLES AND SPACERS FOR HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE SEAT POSTS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+24.2%)
2y 2m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1247 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month