Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/016,233

SEMANTIC PARSING FOR SHORT TEXT

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jan 10, 2025
Priority
Apr 25, 2022 — continuation of 12/204,850
Examiner
WOO, STELLA L
Art Unit
2693
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Lemon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
825 granted / 1035 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1055
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
42.1%
+2.1% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1035 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-20 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,204,850. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Galitsky (US 2020/0117709 A1) discloses a method, comprising: obtaining a set of sentences associated with a short text, each of the set of sentences containing all of words in the short text (relevant sentences are found on the web, associated with an utterance which includes text fragments, using entities within the fragments as a basis to query content sources, para. 0216-0217); determining a set of syntactic features associated with the set of sentences, each of the set of syntactic features indicating at least one of a constituency relation or a dependency relation of the corresponding sentence (a syntactic parse tree is created for each obtained result, para. 0230), but differs from claims 1-20 in that it does not teach or fairly suggest: determining a semantic structure of the short text based on the set of syntactic features, the semantic structure comprising a constituent for each of the words. Canim et al. (US 2019/0236469 A1) teach semantically parsing an utterance to produce a logical form of a request. Hong (US 2022/0180056 A1) teaches classifying each word according to constituent tags (para. 0060). Van Dyke et al. (US 11,170,154 B1) teach a constituency parser and dependency parser. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Stella L Woo whose telephone number is (571)272-7512. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ahmad Matar can be reached at 571-272-7488. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STELLA L. WOO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2693 /Stella L. Woo/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2693
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 10, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763089
SPEECH PROCESSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756795
Calibrating A Physical Space For Multi-Camera Video Stream Selection For In-Person Conference Participants
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12754711
AUDIO DEVICE, PROGRAM, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12748921
READMISSION MODEL BASED ON SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12726593
METHODS, APPARATUSES, DEVICES AND STORAGE MEDIUMS FOR INTERACTION IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.4%)
2y 7m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1035 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month