Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 19/016,508

MAGNETIC HEAD AND MAGNETIC RECORDING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jan 10, 2025
Priority
Feb 01, 2024 — JP 2024-014247
Examiner
KIM, MICHELLE JINJU
Art Unit
2688
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
7 granted / 10 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +43% interview lift
Without
With
+42.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
32
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
70.8%
+30.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 10 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on IDS - 01/10/2025 is being considered by the examiner. A signed IDS is hereby attached. Election/Restrictions Claims 1-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim 21 is cancelled. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 02/09/2026 and 04/14/2026. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 22-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 22 recites “the first magnetic layer”, “the second magnetic layer”, “the third magnetic layer”, “the fourth magnetic layer”, “the first magnetic shield”, and “the second magnetic shield”. It is unclear what these limitations represent and therefore renders the claim as indefinite. For examination purposes, claim 22 is interpreted as “the first shield”, “the second shield”, “the third shield”, “the fourth shield”, “the first shield”, and “the second shield”. Claim 24 recites “the third magnetic shield”. It is unclear what these limitations represent and therefore renders the claim as indefinite. For examination purposes, claim 24 is interpreted as “the third shield”. Claims 24 and 26 are indefinite by virtue of their respective dependency on claims 22. Claim 23 recites “the first magnetic layer”, “the second magnetic layer”, “the third magnetic layer”, and “the fourth magnetic layer”. It is unclear what these limitations represent and therefore renders the claim as indefinite. For examination purposes, claim 23 is interpreted as “the first shield”, “the second shield”, “the third shield”, and “the fourth shield”. Claim 25 recites “the third magnetic shield”. It is unclear what these limitations represent and therefore renders the claim as indefinite. For examination purposes, claim 25 is interpreted as “the third shield”. Claims 25 and 27 are indefinite by virtue of their respective dependency on claims 23. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 22, and 24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chang et al. U.S. Patent Publication Number US20040156148A1(hereinafter Chang) in view of Shirotori et al. U. S. Patent Publication Number US20240371400(hereinafter Shirotori) and Yamane et al. U.S. Patent Number 8913349 B2(hereinafter Yamane). PNG media_image1.png 365 572 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 22, Chang discloses a magnetic head, comprising: a reproducing section (Fig. 7, i.e., 720; paragraph [0034], i.e., head 700) including a medium facing face (para. [0028] i.e., the shields … arranged normal to the ABS with a thickness providing the shielding of the read sensor … from adjacent tracks.), the reproducing section including: a first shield (Fig. 7, i.e., 704; paragraph [0034], i.e., bottom … (or first …) magnetic shield layers 704 ); a second shield ( Fig. 7 i.e., 707; paragraph [0034], i.e., "top (… second) magnetic shield layers … 707" ), a direction from the first shield to the second shield being along a first direction along the medium facing face ( Fig. 7 i.e., 707; paragraph [0034], i.e., bottom and top (or first and second) magnetic shield layers 704, 707"); a third shield (see Fig. 7, i.e., 708; paragraph [0034], i.e., side shields 708); a fourth shield, a second direction from the third shield to the fourth shield being along the medium facing face and crossing the first direction (Fig. 7, i.e., 709; paragraph [0034], i.e., "side shields … 709" and "formed separately from the shield 707"; The side shields are arranged laterally, while the first and top shields are positioned on the top and bottom vertically); a first magnetic member (see Fig. 7, i.e., 728; paragraph [0034], i.e., free layer 728) provided between the first shield and the second shield (Fig. 7, i.e., 728; paragraph [0034]; The first magnetic member is sandwiched between the first shield 704 and the second shield 707), and between the third shield and the fourth shield (Fig. 7, i.e., 728; paragraph [0034]; The first magnetic member is sandwiched between the third shield 708 and the fourth shield 709); a first terminal (see annotated Fig. 7, i.e., 710; paragraph [0034] i.e., electrical contacts 710) electrically connected to the first shield (see annotated Fig. 7, i.e., 710; paragraph [0034] i.e., electrical contacts 710; The first terminal is an electrical contact and it touches the first shield 704 as shown in Fig. 7); and a second terminal (see annotated Fig. 7, i.e., 712; upper most portion of 712 ; paragraph [0034] i.e., electrical contacts…712) electrically connected to the second shield (see annotated Fig. 7, i.e., 712; paragraph [0034] i.e., electrical contacts…712; The second terminal is an electrical contact and it touches the second shield 707 as shown in annotated Fig. 7) but Chang remains silent as to a third terminal electrically connected to the first magnetic member, wherein the first shield includes a first region facing the first magnetic member, the second shield includes a second region facing the first magnetic member, a first region magnetization of the first region includes a component along a third direction crossing the medium facing face, and a second region magnetization of the second region includes the component along a fourth direction opposite to the third direction. In an analogous art, Shirotori teaches a third terminal electrically connected to the first magnetic member (Fig. 1 i.e., "side shield terminal" and "side shield 41 r"; para. [0042] i.e., The common side shield terminal 20T is electrically connected to the first opposing side shield 41 r …; para. [0048] i.e., The first magnetic member 11 is electrically connected …via the first conductive member 11 c. The first magnetic member 11 is electrically connected to … first opposing side shield 41 r via the first conductive member 11 c.). Shirotori teaches placing one or more non-magnetic, highly thermally conductive members adjacent to the reproducing section so they function as heat sinks. A conductive member is connected to the third shield, and another to the fourth shield, to draw heat away from the magnetic member. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the terminal configuration as taught by Shirotori into a magnetic head in order to enable effective heat dissipation (Shirotori , para. 36). Chang further disclose the first magnetic member (Fig. 7, i.e., 728; paragraph [0034], i.e., free layer 728) being provided between the first magnetic layer and the second magnetic layer in the first direction (Fig. 7, i.e., 728; paragraph [0034]; The first magnetic member is sandwiched between the first shield 704 and the second shield 707) and between the third magnetic layer and the fourth magnetic layer in the second direction (Fig. 7, i.e., 728; paragraph [0034]; The first magnetic member is sandwiched between the third shield 708 and the fourth shield 709). In analogous art, Yamane teaches a first magnetization of the first magnetic shield including a component along a third direction crossing the medium facing face (FIG. 13D i.e., 4a; Col. 17 lines 6-10 i.e., the lower shield layer 4 where their magnetizations …4a are substantially orthogonalized…), and a second magnetization of the second magnetic shield including a component along a fourth direction opposite to the third direction (FIG. 13D i.e., 3a; Col. 17 lines 6-10 i.e., the lower shield layer 4 where their magnetizations 3a… are substantially orthogonalized…). Yamane describes that a high-density hard disk recording requires narrower shield gaps and narrower tracks, but conventional structures suffer from reduced heat dissipation and current limitations. Yamane solves these issues by combining a Current-Perpendicular-to-Plane (CPP) MR part with side shield layers and specially biased shield layers so the two ferromagnetic layers become substantially orthogonal without requiring a backside permanent magnet. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the magnetization of the lower shield layer and upper shield layer as taught by Yamane into a magnetic head in order to improve read density and sensitivity while avoiding leakage-related quality problems (Yamane, Col. 5 lines 63-67 and Col. 6 lines 1-7). Regarding claim 24, Chang as modified by Shirotori and Yamane teaches the magnetic head according to claim 22 as discussed above but fails to explicitly teach the third terminal is electrically connected to the first magnetic member through the third magnetic shield. In an analogous art, Shirotori teaches the third terminal is electrically connected to the first magnetic member through the third magnetic shield (para. [0048] i.e., The first magnetic member 11 is electrically connected …via the first conductive member 11 c. The first magnetic member 11 is electrically connected to … first opposing side shield 41 r via the first conductive member 11 c.). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the terminal configuration as taught by Shirotori into a magnetic head in order to enable effective heat dissipation (Shirotori , para. 36). Claim(s) 26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chang as modified by Shirotori and Yamane as applied to claim 22 above, and further in view of Kikitsu et al. U.S. Patent Publication Number US20250174247A1(hereinafter Kikitsu). Regarding claim 26, Chang as modified by Shirotori and Yamane teaches the magnetic head according to claim 22 as discussed above but fails to explicitly teach a magnetic recording device, comprising: the magnetic head ; a magnetic recording medium facing the magnetic head; a first circuit; and a second circuit, the first circuit being configured to supply a current between the first terminal and the second terminal, the second circuit being configured to detect a voltage between the third terminal and one of the first terminal and the second terminal, and the voltage being configured to change depending on a magnetization state recorded on the magnetic recording medium. In an analogous art, Kikitsu teaches a magnetic recording device, comprising: the magnetic head; a magnetic recording medium facing the magnetic head (Fig. 12, i.e., 70; para. [0204] i.e., a magnetic recording medium facing the magnetic head); a first circuit (Fig. 1 i.e., first circuit 52 ); and a second circuit (Fig. 1 i.e., second circuit 51), the first circuit being configured to supply a current between the first terminal and the second terminal, the second circuit being configured to detect a voltage between the third terminal and one of the first terminal and the second terminal, and the voltage being configured to change depending on a magnetization state recorded on the magnetic recording medium (para. [0037] i.e., first circuit 51 and a second circuit 52…configured to supply current…voltage…depending on the magnetization). Kikitsu teaches the head uses a magnetic member positioned between crossed shield pairs, with shield geometries that bias magnetic components in different directions. This arrangement allows the sensed resistance or voltage to vary with the medium’s magnetization while keeping the sensing structure more thermally stable. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the circuit configuration as taught by Kikitsu into a magnetic head in order to promote efficient heat dissipation (Kikitsu, para. 39). Claim(s) 23, and 25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chang in view of Shirotori and Yamane. PNG media_image1.png 365 572 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 23, Chang discloses a magnetic head, comprising: a reproducing section (Fig. 7, i.e., 720; paragraph [0034], i.e., head 700) including a medium facing face (para. [0028] i.e., the shields … arranged normal to the ABS with a thickness providing the shielding of the read sensor … from adjacent tracks.), the reproducing section including: a first shield (Fig. 7, i.e., 704; paragraph [0034], i.e., bottom … (or first …) magnetic shield layers 704 ); a second shield ( Fig. 7 i.e., 707; paragraph [0034], i.e., "top (… second) magnetic shield layers … 707" ), a direction from the first shield to the second shield being along a first direction along the medium facing face ( Fig. 7 i.e., 707; paragraph [0034], i.e., bottom and top (or first and second) magnetic shield layers 704, 707"); a third shield (see Fig. 7, i.e., 708; paragraph [0034], i.e., side shields 708); a fourth shield, a second direction from the third shield to the fourth shield being along the medium facing face and crossing the first direction (Fig. 7, i.e., 709; paragraph [0034], i.e., "side shields … 709" and "formed separately from the shield 707"; The side shields are arranged laterally, while the first and top shields are positioned on the top and bottom vertically); a first magnetic member (see Fig. 7, i.e., 728; paragraph [0034], i.e., free layer 728) provided between the first shield and the second shield (Fig. 7, i.e., 728; paragraph [0034]; The first magnetic member is sandwiched between the first shield 704 and the second shield 707), and between the third shield and the fourth shield (Fig. 7, i.e., 728; paragraph [0034]; The first magnetic member is sandwiched between the third shield 708 and the fourth shield 709) ; a first terminal (see annotated Fig. 7, i.e., 710; paragraph [0034] i.e., electrical contacts 710) electrically connected to the first shield (see annotated Fig. 7, i.e., 710; paragraph [0034] i.e., electrical contacts 710; The first terminal is an electrical contact and it touches the first shield 704 as shown in Fig. 7); and a second terminal (see annotated Fig. 7, i.e., 712; upper most portion of 712 ; paragraph [0034] i.e., electrical contacts…712) electrically connected to the second shield (see annotated Fig. 7, i.e., 712; paragraph [0034] i.e., electrical contacts…712; The second terminal is an electrical contact and it touches the second shield 707 as shown in annotated Fig. 7) but Chang remains silent as to a third terminal electrically connected to the first magnetic member, wherein the first shield includes a first region facing the first magnetic member, the second shield includes a second region facing the first magnetic member, a first region magnetization of the first region includes a component along a third direction crossing the medium facing face, and a second region magnetization of the second region includes the component along a fourth direction opposite to the third direction. In an analogous art, Shirotori teaches a third terminal electrically connected to the first magnetic member (Fig. 1 i.e., "side shield terminal" and "side shield 41 r"; para. [0042] i.e., The common side shield terminal 20T is electrically connected to the first opposing side shield 41 r …; para. [0048] i.e., The first magnetic member 11 is electrically connected …via the first conductive member 11 c. The first magnetic member 11 is electrically connected to … first opposing side shield 41 r via the first conductive member 11 c.). Shirotori teaches placing one or more non-magnetic, highly thermally conductive members adjacent to the reproducing section so they function as heat sinks. A conductive member is connected to the third shield, and another to the fourth shield, to draw heat away from the magnetic member. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the terminal configuration as taught by Shirotori into a magnetic head in order to enable effective heat dissipation (Shirotori , para. 36). Chang further disclose the first magnetic member (Fig. 7, i.e., 728; paragraph [0034], i.e., free layer 728) being provided between the first magnetic layer and the second magnetic layer in the first direction (Fig. 7, i.e., 728; paragraph [0034]; The first magnetic member is sandwiched between the first shield 704 and the second shield 707) and between the third magnetic layer and the fourth magnetic layer in the second direction (Fig. 7, i.e., 728; paragraph [0034]; The first magnetic member is sandwiched between the third shield 708 and the fourth shield 709). In an analogous art, Yamane teaches the first shield includes a first region facing the first magnetic member (FIG. 13D i.e., lower shield layer 4; Col. 9 lines 21-25 i.e., lower shield layer 4), the second shield includes a second region facing the first magnetic member (FIG. 13D i.e., upper shield layer3; Col. 9 lines 21-25 i.e., upper shield layer 3), a first region magnetization of the first region includes a component along a third direction crossing the medium facing face (FIG. 13D i.e., 4a; Col. 17 lines 6-10 i.e., the lower shield layer 4 where their magnetizations …4a are substantially orthogonalized…), and a second region magnetization of the second region includes the component along a fourth direction opposite to the third direction (FIG. 13D i.e., 3a; Col. 17 lines 6-10 i.e., the lower shield layer 4 where their magnetizations 3a… are substantially orthogonalized…). Yamane describes that a high-density hard disk recording requires narrower shield gaps and narrower tracks, but conventional structures suffer from reduced heat dissipation and current limitations. Yamane solves these issues by combining a Current-Perpendicular-to-Plane (CPP) MR part with side shield layers and specially biased shield layers so the two ferromagnetic layers become substantially orthogonal without requiring a backside permanent magnet. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the magnetization of the lower shield layer and upper shield layer as taught by Yamane into a magnetic head in order to improve read density and sensitivity while avoiding leakage-related quality problems (Yamane, Col. 5 lines 63-67 and Col. 6 lines 1-7). Regarding claim 25, Chang as modified by Shirotori and Yamane teaches the magnetic head according to claim 23 as discussed above but fails to explicitly teach the third terminal is electrically connected to the first magnetic member through the third magnetic shield. In an analogous art, Shirotori teaches the third terminal is electrically connected to the first magnetic member through the third magnetic shield (para. [0048] i.e., The first magnetic member 11 is electrically connected …via the first conductive member 11 c. The first magnetic member 11 is electrically connected to … first opposing side shield 41 r via the first conductive member 11 c.). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the terminal configuration as taught by Shirotori into a magnetic head in order to enable effective heat dissipation (Shirotori , para. 36). Claim(s) 27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chang as modified by Shirotori and Yamane as applied to claim 23 above, and further in view of Kikitsu. Regarding claim 27, Chang as modified by Shirotori and Yamane teaches the magnetic head according to claim 23 as discussed above but fails to explicitly teach a magnetic recording device, comprising: the magnetic head ; a magnetic recording medium facing the magnetic head; a first circuit; and a second circuit, the first circuit being configured to supply a current between the first terminal and the second terminal, the second circuit being configured to detect a voltage between the third terminal and one of the first terminal and the second terminal, and the voltage being configured to change depending on a magnetization state recorded on the magnetic recording medium. In an analogous art, Kikitsu teaches a magnetic recording device, comprising: the magnetic head; a magnetic recording medium facing the magnetic head (Fig. 12, i.e., 70; para. [0204] i.e., a magnetic recording medium facing the magnetic head); a first circuit (Fig. 1 i.e., first circuit 52 ); and a second circuit (Fig. 1 i.e., second circuit 51), the first circuit being configured to supply a current between the first terminal and the second terminal, the second circuit being configured to detect a voltage between the third terminal and one of the first terminal and the second terminal, and the voltage being configured to change depending on a magnetization state recorded on the magnetic recording medium (para. [0037] i.e., first circuit 51 and a second circuit 52…configured to supply current…voltage…depending on the magnetization). Kikitsu teaches the head uses a magnetic member positioned between crossed shield pairs, with shield geometries that bias magnetic components in different directions. This arrangement allows the sensed resistance or voltage to vary with the medium’s magnetization while keeping the sensing structure more thermally stable. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the circuit configuration as taught by Kikitsu into a magnetic head in order to promote efficient heat dissipation (Kikitsu, para. 39). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHELLE J KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-5571. The examiner can normally be reached Mon.-Fri. 11am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Lim can be reached at (571) 270-1210. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHELLE J. KIM/Examiner, Art Unit 2688 /STEVEN LIM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2688
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 10, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685028
Buffer Layers, Interlayers, and Barrier Layers Comprising Heusler Alloys for SOT Based Sensor, Memory, and Storage Devices
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682925
Tape Head Assembly with Piezoelectric Actuator
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12658206
Servo Write Head For Writing Servo Patterns Having Opposite-Polarity Bars
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12586604
Gimbal Design For Hard Disk Drive Device
1y 10m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580005
MAGNETIC TAPE CARTRIDGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF MAGNETIC TAPE CARTRIDGE
2y 1m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+42.9%)
1y 8m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 10 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month