Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/017,063

FLUCTUATING PROGRESS INDICATOR

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 10, 2025
Priority
Jun 10, 2016 — provisional 62/348,808 +4 more
Examiner
FRISBY, KESHA
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
410 granted / 775 resolved
-17.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
812
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§103
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§102
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 775 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4, 6-11, 13-18 & 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kamakin (RU 2158021 C1) in view of Shiraski et al. (U.S. Publication 2009/0170664). Referring to claims 1, 8 & 15, Kamakin discloses comprising receiving a first user input at a user device to begin a breathing sequence (determine number of breaths); providing first heart rate information on a display of the user device during a first phase of the breathing sequence, wherein the first heart rate information is generated based on first collected heart rate data (heart rate sensor); causing fluctuation of a fluctuating user interface element on the display of the user device during a second phase of the breathing sequence (display of fluctuations); and providing second heart rate information on the display of the user device during a third phase of the breathing sequence, wherein the second heart rate information is generated based on second collected heart rate data (readings). Kamakin does not disclose responsive to receiving a first user input at an input component of a user device, beginning a breathing sequence configured to direct a user breathing exercise; responsive to collecting first user heart rate data using a sensor of the user device, generating and displaying, first heart rate information on a display of the user device during a first phase of the breathing sequence; causing fluctuation of a fluctuating user interface element on the display of the user device during a second phase of the breathing sequence, wherein the fluctuation is associated with user breathing cues for performing the user breathing exercise; and responsive to collecting second heart rate data using the sensor of the user device, generating and displaying, providing second heart rate information on the display of the user device during a third phase of the breathing sequence. However, Shirasaki et al. teaches responsive to receiving a first user input at an input component of a user device, beginning a breathing sequence configured to direct a user breathing exercise (Figs. 7-10); responsive to collecting first user heart rate data using a sensor of the user device, generating and displaying, first heart rate information on a display of the user device during a first phase of the breathing sequence (Figs. 7-10); causing fluctuation of a fluctuating user interface element on the display of the user device during a second phase of the breathing sequence, wherein the fluctuation is associated with user breathing cues for performing the user breathing exercise (Figs. 7-10); and responsive to collecting second heart rate data using the sensor of the user device, generating and displaying, providing second heart rate information on the display of the user device during a third phase of the breathing sequence (Figs. 7-10) . It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to include responsive to receiving a first user input at an input component of a user device, beginning a breathing sequence configured to direct a user breathing exercise; responsive to collecting first user heart rate data using a sensor of the user device, generating and displaying, first heart rate information on a display of the user device during a first phase of the breathing sequence; causing fluctuation of a fluctuating user interface element on the display of the user device during a second phase of the breathing sequence, wherein the fluctuation is associated with user breathing cues for performing the user breathing exercise; and responsive to collecting second heart rate data using the sensor of the user device, generating and displaying, providing second heart rate information on the display of the user device during a third phase of the breathing sequence, as disclosed by Shirasaki et al., incorporated into Kamakin, in order guide an exercise pattern of breathing to a user. Referring to claims 2 & 9 & 16, Kamakin discloses wherein the first heart rate information comprises a first heart rate user interface element and a first heart metric, and the second heart rate information comprises a second heart rate user interface element and a second heart metric (heart rate sensor). Referring to claims 3, 10 & 17, Kamakin discloses wherein the first heart rate user interface element pulsates in a manner that corresponds to a first measured heart rate based on the first collected heart rate data (reading/display of fluctuations). Referring to claims 4, 11 & 18, Kamakin discloses wherein the second heart rate user interface element pulsates in a manner that corresponds to a second measured heart rate based on the second collected heart rate data (heart rate sensor). Referring to claims 5, 12 & 19, Kamakin discloses further comprising: during the first phase of the breathing sequence, collecting the first heart rate data using one or more sensors of the user device (heart rate sensor & square pulse generator); and during the third phase of the breathing sequence, collecting the second heart rate data using the one or more sensors of the user device (heart rate sensor & square pulse generator). Referring to claims 6 & 13, Kamakin discloses wherein the first phase comprises a preliminary phase, the second phase comprises a breathing phase, and the third phase comprises a concluding phase, and wherein the breathing phase occurs before the concluding phase and after the preliminary phase (square pulse generator). Referring to claims 7 & 14 & 20, Kamakin discloses wherein the fluctuation comprises repeated growing and repeated shrinking of the fluctuating user interface element at a cyclic rate during the second phase, the cyclic rate corresponding to breath ratio (breaths and exhalations of fluctuations). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KESHA FRISBY whose telephone number is (571)272-8774. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 730AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at 571-272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KESHA FRISBY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 10, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 17, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749411
INTERACTIVE CONVERSATIONAL CHATBOT FOR ENHANCING COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF INDIVIDUALS WITH LANGUAGE DIFFICULTIES
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743966
EYE-IMAGING TRAINING APPARATUS AND METHODS OF TRAINING
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738174
INTERACTIVE DIGITAL LEARNING PLATFORM SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12714913
MEASUREMENT STATION AND SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING THE FUNCTIONAL AGE OF A USER
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12718707
SUTURING SKILL SIMULATOR AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
1y 12m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+23.3%)
3y 8m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 775 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month