Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/017,081

COMPUTING ATTRIBUTE PSNR BASED ON GEOMETRIC ERRORS FOR MESH QUALITY EVALUATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 10, 2025
Priority
Jan 12, 2024 — provisional 63/620,699
Examiner
HOLDER, ANNER N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
601 granted / 761 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
781
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§103
53.7%
+13.7% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 761 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 02/ is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. US 2023/0360275 in view of Mammou et al. US 2023/0030913. As to claim 1, Zhang teaches a method of mesh decoding, the method comprising: receiving a bitstream that includes coded attribute information of a first vertices of a reference mesh and a second vertices of a distorted mesh, the distorted mesh being associated with the reference mesh; [abstract; ¶ 0022; ¶ 0030-0036; ¶ 0049-0053] determining a first point cloud based on the first vertices of the reference mesh and a second point cloud based on the second vertices of the distorted mesh; [abstract; ¶ 0022; ¶ 0033; ¶ 0036-0037; ¶ 0049-0053; ¶ 0067-0071] determining at least one of a symmetric geometric error or a symmetric attribute error based on a plurality of distances between points of the first point cloud and points of the second point cloud, each of the plurality of distances being determined between a respective point of the first point cloud and a point of the second point cloud that corresponds to the respective point of the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] and determining a peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) based on one of the symmetric geometric error and the symmetric attribute error, wherein the symmetric geometric error indicates differences between the points of the first point cloud and the points of the second point cloud with respect to the points of one of the first point cloud and the second point cloud. [¶ 0036-0046; ¶ 0046-0052] Zhang does not explicitly teach a plurality of vertices. Mammou teaches a plurality of vertices. [¶ 0518-0519; ¶ 0535-0537; ¶ 0568] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the techniques of Mammou with the teachings of Zhang allowing for improved mesh to point cloud efficiency. As to claim 2, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 1. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the first point cloud further comprises one of: determining the first vertices of the reference mesh as the points of the first point cloud; [abstract; ¶ 0033; ¶0048-0052; ¶ 0067-0071] and determining a sample of the first vertices of the reference mesh as the points of the first point cloud. [abstract; ¶ 0036; ¶ 0049-0052; ¶ 0066-0071] Zhang does not explicitly teach determining a sampled subset of the plurality of first vertices of the reference mesh as the points of the first point cloud. Mammou teaches determining a sampled subset of the plurality of first vertices of the reference mesh as the points of the first point cloud. [¶ 0518-0519; ¶ 0535-0537; ¶ 0568] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the techniques of Mammou with the teachings of Zhang allowing for improved mesh to point cloud efficiency. As to claim 3, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 1. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the at least one of the symmetric geometric error or the symmetric attribute error further comprises: determining each of the plurality of distances based on a position value of the respective point of the first point cloud and a position value of the point of the second point cloud that corresponds to the respective point of the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a plurality of squared distances based on the plurality of distances; [¶ 0036-0046] determining a first geometric error based on a sum of the plurality of squared distances divided by a total number of the points in the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0046] determining a second geometric error based on the sum of the plurality of squared distances divided by a total number of the points in the second point cloud; [¶ 0036-0046] and determining the symmetric geometric error as a maximum one of the first geometric error and the second geometric error. [¶ 0036-0046] As to claim 4, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 1. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the at least one of the symmetric geometric error or the symmetric attribute error further comprises: determining each of the plurality of distances based on a position value of the respective point of the first point cloud and a position value of the point of the second point cloud that corresponds to the respective point of the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a plurality of projected distances based on the plurality of distances, each of the plurality of projected distances being a component of a respective one of the plurality of distances projected onto a normal of the respective point of the first point cloud; [¶ 0037-0046] determining a plurality of squared projected distances based on the plurality of projected distances; [¶ 0037-0046] determining a first geometric error based on a sum of the plurality of squared projected distances divided by a total number of the points in the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0046] determining a second geometric error based on the sum of the plurality of squared projected distances divided by a total number of the points in the second point cloud; [¶ 0036-0046] and determining the symmetric geometric error as a maximum one of the first geometric error and the second geometric error. [¶ 0036-0046] As to claim 5, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 1. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the at least one of the symmetric geometric error or the symmetric attribute error further comprises: determining each of the plurality of distances based on an attribute value of the respective point of the first point cloud and an attribute value the point of the second point cloud that corresponds to the respective point of the first point cloud; [¶ 0037-0046] determining a plurality of squared distances based on the plurality of distances; [¶ 0037-0046] determining a first attribute error based on a sum of the plurality of squared distances divided by a total number of the points in the first point cloud; [¶ 0037-0046] determining a second attribute error based on the sum of the plurality of squared distances divided by a total number of the points in the second point cloud; [¶ 0037-0046] and determining the symmetric attribute error as a maximum one of the first attribute error and the second attribute error. [¶ 0037-0046] As to claim 6, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 1. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the at least one of the symmetric geometric error or the symmetric attribute error further comprises: projecting each of the points of the second point cloud into a plane including the respective point of the first point cloud to obtain a projection point on the plane, a normal of the respective point of the first point cloud being perpendicular to the plane; [¶ 0037-0046] determining each of the plurality of distances based on an attribute value of the respective point of the second point cloud and an attribute of the projection point that corresponds to the respective point of the second point cloud; [¶ 0037-0046] determining a plurality of squared distances based on the plurality of distances; [¶ 0037-0046] determining a first attribute error based on a sum of the plurality of squared distances divided by a total number of the points in the first point cloud; [¶ 0037-0046] determining a second attribute error based on the sum of the plurality of squared distances divided by a total number of the points in the second point cloud; [¶ 0037-0046] and determining the symmetric attribute error as a maximum one of the first attribute error and the second attribute error. [¶ 0037-0046] As to claim 7, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 1. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the PSNR further comprises: determining the PSNR based on a logarithmic function of a squared peak value divided by one of the symmetric geometric error and the symmetric attribute error, the peak value being defined as a diagonal distance of a bounding box of one of the first point cloud and the second point cloud. [fig. 5; ¶ 0036-0052] As to claim 8, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 1. Zhang teaches wherein the symmetric geometric error is determined as a maximum one of (i) a first geometric error based on position values of the points of the first point cloud, position values of the points of the second point cloud, and a total number of the points of the first point cloud and (ii) a second geometric error based on the position values of the points of the first point cloud, the position values of the points of the second point cloud, and a total number of the points of the second point cloud. [¶ 0036-0052] As to claim 9, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 1. Zhang teaches wherein the symmetric attribute error is determined as a maximum one of (i) a first attribute error based on attribute values of the points of the first point cloud, attribute values of the points of the second point cloud, and a total number of the points of the first point cloud and (ii) a second geometric error based on the attribute values of the points of the first point cloud, the attribute values of the points of the second point cloud, and a total number of the points of the second point cloud. [¶ 0036-0052] As to claim 10, Zhang teaches a method of mesh encoding, the method comprising: determining a distorted mesh based on a reference mesh, the reference mesh including a first vertices, the distorted mesh including a second vertices; [abstract; ¶ 0022; ¶ 0030-0036; ¶ 0049-0053] determining a first point cloud based on the first vertices of the reference mesh and a second point cloud based on the second vertices of the distorted mesh; [abstract; ¶ 0022; ¶ 0033; ¶ 0036-0037; ¶ 0049-0053; ¶ 0067-0071] determining at least one of a symmetric geometric error or a symmetric attribute error based on a plurality of distances between points of the first point cloud and points of the second point cloud, each of the plurality of distances being determined between a respective point of the first point cloud and a point of the second point cloud that corresponds to the respective one of the points of the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] and determining a peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) based on one of the symmetric geometric error and the symmetric attribute error, wherein the symmetric geometric error indicates differences between the points of the first point cloud and the points of the second point cloud with respect to the points of one of the first point cloud and the second point cloud. [¶ 0036-0052] Zhang does not explicitly teach a plurality of vertices. Mammou teaches a plurality of vertices. [¶ 0518-0519; ¶ 0535-0537; ¶ 0568] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the techniques of Mammou with the teachings of Zhang allowing for improved mesh to point cloud efficiency. As to claim 11, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 10. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the first point cloud further comprises one of: determining the first vertices of the reference mesh as the points of the first point cloud; [abstract; ¶ 0033; ¶0048-0052; ¶ 0067-0071] and determining a sample of the first vertices of the reference mesh as the points of the first point cloud. [abstract; ¶ 0036; ¶ 0049-0052; ¶ 0066-0071] Zhang does not explicitly teach determining a sampled subset of the plurality of first vertices of the reference mesh as the points of the first point cloud. Mammou teaches determining a sampled subset of the plurality of first vertices of the reference mesh as the points of the first point cloud. [¶ 0518-0519; ¶ 0535-0537; ¶ 0568] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the techniques of Mammou with the teachings of Zhang allowing for improved mesh to point cloud efficiency. As to claim 12, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 10. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the at least one of the symmetric geometric error or the symmetric attribute error further comprises: determining each of the plurality of distances based on a position value of the respective point of the first point cloud and a position value of the point of the second point cloud that corresponds to the respective point of the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a plurality of squared distances based on the plurality of distances; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a first geometric error based on a sum of the plurality of squared distances divided by a total number of the points in the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a second geometric error based on the sum of the plurality of squared distances divided by a total number of the points in the second point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] and determining the symmetric geometric error as a maximum one of the first geometric error and the second geometric error. [¶ 0036-0052] As to claim 13, Zhang teaches (modified by Mammou) the limitations of claim 10. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the at least one of the symmetric geometric error or the symmetric attribute error further comprises: determining each of the plurality of distances based on a position value of the respective point of the first point cloud and a position value of the point of the second point cloud that corresponds to the respective point of the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a plurality of projected distances based on the plurality of distances, each of the plurality of projected distances being a component of respective one of the plurality of distances projected onto a normal of the respective point of the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a plurality of squared projected distances based on the plurality of projected distances; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a first geometric error based on a sum of the plurality of squared projected distances divided by a total number of the points in the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a second geometric error based on the sum of the plurality of squared projected distances divided by a total number of the points in the second point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] and determining the symmetric geometric error as a maximum one of the first geometric error and the second geometric error. [¶ 0036-0052] As to claim 14, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 10. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the at least one of the symmetric geometric error or the symmetric attribute error further comprises: determining each of the plurality of distances based on an attribute value of the respective point of the first point cloud and an attribute value the point of the second point cloud that corresponds to the respective point of the first point cloud; determining a plurality of squared distances based on the plurality of distances; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a first attribute error based on a sum of the plurality of squared distances divided by a total number of the points in the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a second attribute error based on the sum of the plurality of squared distances divided by a total number of the points in the second point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] and determining the symmetric attribute error as a maximum one of the first attribute error and the second attribute error. [¶ 0036-0052] As to claim 15, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 10. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the at least one of the symmetric geometric error or the symmetric attribute error further comprises: projecting each of the points of the second point cloud into a plane including the respective point of the first point cloud to obtain a projection point on the plane, a normal of the respective point of the first point cloud being perpendicular to the plane; [¶ 0036-0052] determining each of the plurality of distances based on an attribute value of the respective point of the second point cloud and an attribute of the projection point that corresponds to the respective point of the second point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a plurality of squared distances based on the plurality of distances; determining a first attribute error based on a sum of the plurality of squared distances divided by a total number of the points in the first point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] determining a second attribute error based on the sum of the plurality of squared distances divided by a total number of the points in the second point cloud; [¶ 0036-0052] and determining the symmetric attribute error as a maximum one of the first attribute error and the second attribute error. [¶ 0036-0052] As to claim 16, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 10. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the PSNR further comprises: determining the PSNR based on a logarithmic function of a squared peak value divided by one of the symmetric geometric error and the symmetric attribute error, the peak value being defined as a diagonal distance of a bounding box of one of the first point cloud and the second point cloud. [fig. 5; ¶ 0036-0052] As to claim 17, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 10. Zhang teaches wherein the symmetric geometric error is determined as a maximum one of (i) a first geometric error based on position values of the points of the first point cloud, position values of the points of the second point cloud, and a total number of the points of the first point cloud and (ii) a second geometric error based on the position values of the points of the first point cloud, the position values of the points of the second point cloud, and a total number of the points of the second point cloud. [¶ 0036-0052] As to claim 18, Zhang (modified by Mammou ) teaches the limitations of claim 10. Zhang teaches wherein the symmetric attribute error is determined as a maximum one of (i) a first attribute error based on attribute values of the points of the first point cloud, attribute values of the points of the second point cloud, and a total number of the points of the first point cloud and (ii) a second geometric error based on the attribute values of the points of the first point cloud, the attribute values of the points of the second point cloud, and a total number of the points of the second point cloud. [¶ 0036-0052] As to claim 19, Zhang teaches the limitations of processing mesh data, the method comprising: processing a bitstream of the mesh data according to a format rule, wherein: the bitstream includes coded information of a first vertices of a reference mesh and a second vertices of a distorted mesh, the distorted mesh being associated with the reference mesh; [abstract; ¶ 0022; ¶ 0030-0036; ¶ 0049-0053] the format rule specifies that: a first point cloud is determined based on the first vertices of the reference mesh and a second point cloud is determined based on the second vertices of the distorted mesh, [abstract; ¶ 0022; ¶ 0033; ¶ 0036-0037; ¶ 0049-0053; ¶ 0067-0071] at least one of a symmetric geometric error or a symmetric attribute error is determined based on a plurality of distances between points of the first point cloud and points of the second point cloud, each of the plurality of distances being determined between a respective point of the first point cloud and a point of the second point cloud that corresponds to the respective point of the first point cloud, [¶ 0036-0052] and a peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) is determined based on one of the symmetric geometric error and the symmetric attribute error; [¶ 0036-0052] and the symmetric geometric error indicates differences between the points of the first point cloud and the points of the second point cloud with respect to the points of one of the first point cloud and the second point cloud. [¶ 0036-0052] Zhang does not explicitly teach a plurality of vertices. Mammou teaches a plurality of vertices. [¶ 0518-0519; ¶ 0535-0537; ¶ 0568] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the techniques of Mammou with the teachings of Zhang allowing for improved mesh to point cloud efficiency. As to claim 20, Zhang (modified by Mammou) teaches the limitations of claim 19. Zhang teaches wherein the determining the first point cloud further comprises one of: determining the first vertices of the reference mesh as the points of the first point cloud; [abstract; ¶ 0033; ¶0048-0052; ¶ 0067-0071] and determining a sample of the first vertices of the reference mesh as the points of the first point cloud. [abstract; ¶ 0036; ¶ 0049-0052; ¶ 0066-0071] Zhang does not explicitly teach determining a sampled subset of the plurality of first vertices of the reference mesh as the points of the first point cloud. Mammou teaches determining a sampled subset of the plurality of first vertices of the reference mesh as the points of the first point cloud. [¶ 0518-0519; ¶ 0535-0537; ¶ 0568] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the techniques of Mammou with the teachings of Zhang allowing for improved mesh to point cloud efficiency. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANNER HOLDER whose telephone number is (571)270-1549. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Ustaris can be reached at 571.272.7383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANNER HOLDER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2483
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 10, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750517
IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND DEVICE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM IN WHICH BITSTREAM IS STORED
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750518
IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND DEVICE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM IN WHICH BITSTREAM IS STORED
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744928
VIDEO DECODING APPARATUS AND VIDEO CODING APPARATUS
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12720099
Multi-Modal Federated Encoding Framework for Encrypted Video Stream Data Compaction
1y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713003
METHOD, DEVICE, AND MEDIUM FOR VIDEO PROCESSING
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.4%)
3y 1m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 761 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month