Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/017,130

SHEET DRYING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM PROVIDED THEREWITH

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 10, 2025
Priority
Jan 17, 2024 — JP 2024-005590
Examiner
SHENDEROV, ALEXANDER D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kyocera Document Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
800 granted / 887 resolved
+30.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 7m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
900
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
70.3%
+30.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 887 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed on 2/17/25, the requirements 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d) are met. Information Disclosure Statement The references cited on a Form PTO 1449 have been considered. Specification The specification has been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. However, the applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-9 and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Watanabe et al. (U.S. 2019/0004468 A1). Watanabe et al. disclose the following claimed limitations: Regarding independent Claim 1, a sheet drying apparatus (20, §§0030-0082 and Figs. 2-8) comprising: a conveyance portion (21, §0031 and Fig. 2) that conveys a sheet (21, §§0023-0025 and Figs. 1-2) having an image formed thereon with ink containing moisture; a drying portion (22, 80, §0031 and Fig. 2) including a heater (80, §0031 and Fig. 2) arranged opposite the conveyance portion, the drying portion heating and drying the sheet by using the heater; a heater voltage power supply (43, §0043 and Fig. 3) that applies an alternating-current voltage to the heater (§0142); and a control portion (70, §0045 and Fig. 4) that controls the heater voltage power supply, wherein the control portion is operable to change a duty of the alternating-current voltage applied to the heater from an initial set value to an adjusted set value (§0111-00143 and Figs. 10-12; the disclosure that “the heating temperature is changed according to the degree of curling” is regarded as reading on this limitation). Regarding Claim 2, the control portion changes the duty from the initial set value to the adjusted set value automatically based on output information on a property of the sheet (§0129, 0142-00143 and Figs. 10-12). Regarding Claim 3, wherein the output information on the property of the sheet includes at least one of a type, a size, a thickness, a print ratio of the sheet (§0129). Regarding Claim 5, an input portion (e.g. 51, §0045 and Fig. 4) that selects as the adjusted set value one of a plurality of duties (the disclosure of selecting the heater duty based on input parameters, §§0111-00143, is regarded as reading on this limitation), wherein when the input portion selects as the adjusted set value one of the plurality of duties, the control portion changes the duty of the alternating-current voltage applied to the heater to the adjusted set value (§§0111-0143 and Figs. 10-12). Regarding Claim 6, wherein when the input portion selects as the adjusted set value one of the plurality of duties and a drying process for the sheet is performed with the alternating-current voltage applied to the heater by use of the selected adjusted set value, the control portion changes the duty from the adjusted set value back to the initial set value after the drying process is performed 0111-0143 and Figs. 10-12). Regarding Claim 7, wherein the input portion is operable to select as the initial set value one of the plurality of duties (e.g. 0 for “off” setting, §0111-0143 and Figs. 10-12). Regarding Claim 8, wherein the control portion is operable to perform, before the drying process for the sheet is performed, preliminary heating to apply the alternating-current voltage to the heater to heat the drying portion to or above a predetermined temperature (§§0142-00143), and when the duty is changed from the initial set value to the adjusted set value, the control portion performs the preliminary heating by applying the alternating-current voltage to the heater by use of the adjusted set value (§§0142-00143 and Figs. 8-9). Regarding Claim 9, wherein if the adjusted set value is 0%, the control portion performs the drying process without performing the preliminary heating (§§0142-00143 and Figs. 10-12). Regarding Claim 12, an image forming system (1, §0019 and Fig. 1) comprising: an image forming apparatus (40, §§0019, 0024-0025 and Fig. 1) that forms an image on a sheet by using ink containing moisture; and the sheet drying apparatus according to claim coupled to the image forming apparatus at a downstream side thereof with respect to a conveyance direction of the sheet, the sheet drying apparatus drying the sheet having the image formed by the image forming apparatus (0025-0026 and Fig. 1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Watanabe et al. (U.S. 2019/0004468 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Yamamoto et al. (U.S. 2011/0267410 A1). Watanabe et al. disclose the following claimed limitations: Regarding Claim 4, all limitations of Claim s (from which this Claim depends); a temperature sensor (H1-HM, §0042 and Fig. 3) that senses temperature outside or inside the sheet drying apparatus, wherein the control portion changes the duty from the initial set value to the adjusted set value automatically based on the temperature sensed by the temperature sensor (§§0141-0143). Watanabe et al. do not disclose the following claimed limitations: Regarding Claim 4, the sensor being a temperature-humidity sensor that senses temperature and humidity, and the control portion changes the duty from the initial set value to the adjusted set value automatically based on the humidity sensed by the humidity sensor. Yamamoto et al. disclose the following claimed limitations: Regarding Claim 4, the sensor being a temperature-humidity sensor (145, 215, §§0042, 0049-0051 and Figs. 7A, 10) that senses temperature and humidity, and the control portion changes the duty from the initial set value to the adjusted set value automatically based on the humidity sensed by the humidity sensor (§0059 and Fig. 12A). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to apply the temperature-humidity sensor of Yamamoto et al. to the sheet drying apparatus of Watanabe et al. to correct the amount of applied heat for ambient humidity and hence obtain optimal drying. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the primary reason for indicating allowable subject matter of claim 10 is the inclusion of the limitations of a sheet drying apparatus including when the duty is changed to the adjusted set value, the control portion changes an amount of air blown by the hot air fan according to the adjusted set value. Similarly, the primary reason for indicating allowable subject matter of claim 10 is the inclusion of the limitations of a sheet drying apparatus including wherein when the duty is changed to the adjusted set value, the control portion changes an amount of air blown by the belt cooling fan according to the adjusted set value. It is these limitations found in the claims, as it is claimed in the combination of that has not been found, taught or suggested by prior art of record, which makes these claims allowable over the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER D SHENDEROV whose telephone number is (571)270-7049. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas X Rodrigues can be reached at (571) 431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDER D SHENDEROV/Examiner, Art Unit 2853 /JASON S UHLENHAKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 10, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679109
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING PRIMER TO DIFFERENT SIZES OF MEDIA IN INKJET PRINTERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12661919
LIQUID EJECTING METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661908
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING PRIMER TO MEDIA IN INKJET PRINTERS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661899
CARTRIDGE, SYSTEM, AND CARTRIDGE SET
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654459
INK CONTAINER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.2%)
1y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 887 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month