Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/017,333

BATTERY MANAGING APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jan 10, 2025
Priority
Jan 12, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0005648
Examiner
NGHIEM, MICHAEL P
Art Unit
2857
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
629 granted / 933 resolved
-0.6% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
987
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 933 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The amendment filed on February 26, 2026 have been considered. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on February 26, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-13, 15-18, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 18, and 20, “generating a distribution profile indicating a correspondence relationship between the plurality of calculated target values and a number of the plurality of batteries that correspond to each of the plurality of target values” is not described in the original disclosure. For instance, the original specification discloses “generate a distribution profile indicating a correspondence relationship between a plurality of calculated target values and the number of each of the plurality of target values” (paragraph 0008, lines 5-7). However, paragraph 0008 does not disclose generating a distribution profile indicating a correspondence relationship between the plurality of calculated target values and a number of the plurality of batteries that correspond to each of the plurality of target values The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-13, 15-18, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1, 18, and 20, “the plurality of target values” (claim 1, lines 10; claim 18, line 8; claim 20, line 10) lacks antecedent basis. Examiner interprets “the plurality of target values” to be -- the calculated plurality of target values --. Prior Art Note Claims 1-13, 15-18, and 20 do not have prior art rejections.: The combination as claimed wherein a battery managing apparatus and method comprising generating a distribution profile indicating a correspondence relationship between the plurality of calculated target values and a number of the plurality of batteries that correspond to each of the plurality of target values (claims 1, 18, 20) is not disclosed, suggested, or made obvious by the prior art of record. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on February 26, 2026 have been fully considered. Applicant’s arguments and amendments with respect to the rejections of under 35 USC 112(b) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejections under 35 USC 112(b) have been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection under 35 USC 112(b) has been issued, as discussed above. Applicant’s amendments with respect to the nonstatutory double rejections have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the nonstatutory double rejections have been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments and amendments with respect to the rejections of under 35 USC 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejections under 35 USC 103 have been withdrawn. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michael Nghiem whose telephone number is (571) 272-2277. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrew Schechter can be reached at (571) 272-2302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /MICHAEL P NGHIEM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2857 March 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Aug 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Nov 19, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 02, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Feb 04, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 04, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638507
AUTOMATIC DOOR MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SYSTEM, AUTOMATIC DOOR MAINTENANCE SUPPORT APPARATUS, AUTOMATIC DOOR APPARATUS, AUTOMATIC DOOR MAINTENANCE SUPPORT METHOD, AND PROGRAM
5y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638563
METHODS AND RELATED SYSTEMS FOR DETECTING MISCALIBRATION OF EXTRINSIC LIDAR PARAMETERS
4y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631977
METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN ALIGNMENT MODEL BASED ON AN OBLIQUE FITTING TECHNIQUE
4y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625016
CONTINUOUS CALIBRATION OF SENSORS IN A REMOTELY MONITORED COOLING SYSTEM
5y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12625290
METHOD AND SYSTEM OF IMAGING HYDROCARBON RESERVOIRS USING ADAPTIVE APERTURE TAPERING IN KIRCHHOFF DEPTH MIGRATION
3y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+24.1%)
3y 8m (~2y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 933 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month