Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 19/019,308

SYSTEM HAVING AUTOMATED LIFT ASSEMBLY AND PROCESS FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING CARGO FROM DELIVERY VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 13, 2025
Priority
May 03, 2019 — provisional 62/842,899 +2 more
Examiner
MATTHEWS, TERRELL HOWARD
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Masterhaul LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
892 granted / 1062 resolved
+32.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1084
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
68.0%
+28.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1062 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cho (KR1019990030497) in view of Tenfelde (DE102017003815). Referring to claim 1. Cho discloses a “Car Transporter”. See Figs. 1-7 and respective portions of the specification. Cho further discloses a cargo loading or unloading system for a vehicle, the system comprising: a storage compartment comprising a two-stage frame (11) supported by fixtures (12), the frame partitioned into a plurality of compartment portions arranged for individually loading and unloading cargo at different positions, including at least a front-upper position and a rear position on each stage of the frame. Thus, Cho discloses a storage compartment comprising at least a two high by two wide array of compartment portions. Cho further discloses a loading conveyor (50) driven by a loading motor (51) rotating a loading rotary shaft (5), installed separately at each compartment portion, configured to move cargo (via a vehicle) into and out of the respective portion. Thus, Cho discloses a compartment portion conveyor located in each compartment portion configured to move the associated cargo into and out of the respective compartment portion. Cho discloses a lift assembly located adjacent the storage compartment, comprising a lifting plate (30) including a platform (31) and a moving conveyor (34), wherein the moving conveyor cooperates with the loading conveyor (50) of compartment portion to receive cargo from and deliver cargo to, that compartment portion. Thus, Cho discloses a lift assembly comprising a platform including a lift assembly conveyor that at least one of receives the associated cargo from, and delivers the associated cargo to, the compartment portions. Likewise, Cho discloses a mounting assembly movably securing the lift assembly to the storage compartment, comprising: a vertical drive mechanism, a lifting motor (22), winding drums (23) and wire (24) coupled to the lifting platform (31), which travels within a guide groove (21) to raise and lower the lifting plate; and a lateral drive mechanism including a moving motor (40), chain connecting rods (41) and mobile chain (42) coupled to a transfer table (20) having feed rollers that ride in a groove (17) formed in a transverse section (16) of the frame (11), moving the transfer table (and lift assembly carried on it) left and right among the compartment portions. As such, Cho teaches a mounting assembly that movably secure the lift assembly adjacent the storage compartment such that the lift assembly is movable both vertically and laterally among the array of compartment portions, whereby the platform can be positioned adjacent any one or more of the compartment portions to receive the associated cargo onto the lift assembly conveyor from an adjacent compartment portion conveyor, or deliver the associated cargo to the adjacent compartment portion conveyor from the lift assembly conveyor. Further, Cho discloses that the lifting plate (30), while carried on the transfer table is selectively moved vertically downward until it contacts the ground surface on which the vehicle is supported, at which point cargo is delivered onto, or received from the lifting plate/platform (30). Thus, Cho discloses a lift assembly is selectively movable vertically downward to a location adjacent a ground surface located vertically below the compartment portions on which the delivery vehicle is supported, to deliver the associated cargo from or receive the associated cargo onto, the lifting assembly conveyor. Cho doesn’t explicitly disclose a compartment portion “opening” through which the cargo passes into and out of each compartment portion. Tenfelde discloses a “Motor Vehicle Shelf and Appropriately Equipped Motor Vehicle“. See Figs. 1-9 and respective portions of the specification. Tenfelde further discloses a motor vehicle rack having a plurality of rack compartments for storing cargo, wherein a rack compartment (compartment portion) is suitable for receiving and supporting cargo that can be opened (See Sect. 0008). Thus, Tenfelde teaches a vehicle cargo compartment portion that includes an opening through which cargo is received and supported. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to ensure that the compartment portions included an opening as taught by Tenfelde, such that the lifting assembly and loading conveyor could pass cargo into and out of each compartment portion, which is the function of the lifting assembly and loading conveyor, which would allow cargo to be moved/slotted into compartments. /TERRELL H MATTHEWS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 13, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735252
METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUS FOR A STRUCTURE FOR QUICK INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL OF SHUTTLE CAR HOUSING
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733432
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING SYSTEM AND MAINTENANCE METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728784
CARGO DECKING ELEVATION SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12708929
DRIVE MEMBER ASSEMBLY FOR A VIBRATORY SCREEN
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12703291
IN-VEHICLE MECHANIZED PACKAGE RETRIEVAL
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1062 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month