Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/019,591

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Priority
Jan 31, 2024 — JP 2024-012670
Examiner
SEVERSON, JEREMY R
Art Unit
1759
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
859 granted / 980 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
999
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
§102
42.5%
+2.5% vs TC avg
§112
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 980 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 22 July 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 16-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kasuga (JP 2021-050050). Regarding claim 16, Kasuga discloses an image forming apparatus, comprising: an image forming device 3a to form an image on a sheet; a sheet stacking portion 15 disposed above the image forming device to stack the sheet on which the image has been formed by the image forming device; a blower fan 20 to take in air; and a duct 25 through which the air taken in flows, wherein the blower fan has an inlet for taking in air and an outlet for blowing the air, and the inlet and the outlet are opposed to each other, the outlet of the blower fan and a wall of the duct are opposed to each other, the wall of the duct includes: a first wall opposed to the outlet of the blower fan; and a second wall located outside the first wall, the second wall not being opposed to the outlet of the blower fan, and the air blown out from the outlet of the blower fan collides with the wall of the duct and is exhausted from an exhaust port 21a via the second wall. See Fig. 6, shown below with annotations. PNG media_image1.png 429 697 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 17, Kasuga discloses the image forming apparatus according to claim 16, wherein the air taken in from the inlet of the blower fan and blown out from the outlet is exhausted in a direction intersecting the sheet ejection direction. See Fig. 5 – the direction (F1) of air blown out from the outlet intersects with the direction of sheets exiting sheet discharge port 11. Regarding claim 18, Kasuga discloses the image forming apparatus according to claim 16, wherein a distance from the outlet of the blower fan to the first wall of the duct is shorter than a distance from the second wall to the exhaust port 21a. See Fig. 6. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-15 are allowed. Claim 19 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the nearest prior art does not teach or suggest the claimed subject matter. For example, Sakagami (US 11,447,357) does not disclose everything claimed, including the first and second air-intake ports as claimed, in combination with the rest of the claimed elements. Response to Arguments Applicant argues that Kasuga does not disclose a wall of the duct that includes a first wall opposed to the outlet of the blower fan and a second wall located outside the first wall and not opposed to the outlet of the blower fan. Remarks, p. 9. The Examiner respectfully disagrees, as explained in the rejection of claim 16, above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jeremy R. Severson, whose telephone number is (571)272-2209. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes, can be reached at (571) 272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEREMY R SEVERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 14, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 12, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 22, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741842
PAPER SHEET STORAGE DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12729086
PAPER FEEDING DEVICE, PAPER FEEDING METHOD, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722922
PAPER FEED ROLL
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12711828
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TWO-WAY CASH RECYCLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12709507
SHEET CONVEYANCE APPARATUS, IMAGE READING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 980 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month