Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 19/019,767

Queueing Storage Operations

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Priority
Sep 07, 2016 — provisional 62/384,691 +6 more
Examiner
DALEY, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY
Art Unit
2184
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Pure Storage Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
699 granted / 833 resolved
+28.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
839
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
58.2%
+18.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 833 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 21 – 40 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 – 23, 25 – 30, 32- 40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ghose (US20070067595). As to claim 21, Ghoose discloses a method comprising: selecting, from a range of latency values, a target latency for executing input/output (I/O) operations based on a queue depth of a queue that includes a plurality of I/O operations (Fig. 1, and steps 105, 110, and 115, where a latency in the form of a priority is chosen to enable the I/O operation, para. 0025); and performing one or more I/O operations of the plurality of I/O operations according to a throughput value that is determined based on the selected target latency (Fig. 1, and step 135 where operations occur, para. 0026). As to claims 22, 29, and 36, Ghoose discloses the method, wherein selecting the target latency comprises evaluating a latency function that scales between a maximum target latency and a minimum target latency based on a queue depth (Fig. 2, and step 215 where all requests are tested, (paras. 0070 – 0075). As to claims 23, 30, and 37, Ghoose discloses the method, wherein the latency function is a power function that intercepts the maximum target latency and the minimum target latency (Fig. 2, and step 245 where an appropriate level is found, (para. 0074) . As to claims 25, 32, and 39, Ghoose discloses the method, further comprising determining the target latency based on the latency function and a current queue depth (Fig.1, and para. 0024, where the target latency is chosen based on queue depth). As to claims 26, 33, and 40, Ghoose discloses the method, further comprising determining a throughput value corresponding to the target latency for writing to at least one storage device (Fig. 1, and step 135, para. 0068). As to claims 27, and 34, Ghoose discloses the method, wherein the throughput value is selected to ensure that write operations in the queue complete within the target latency (Fig. 1, and step 130, para. 0068). As to claim 28, Ghoose discloses an apparatus comprising a computer processor and a computer memory operatively coupled to the computer processor, the computer memory having disposed within it computer program instructions that, when executed by the computer processor, cause the apparatus (Fig. 1 operates on a system, comprising a computer, and related memory system, para. 0005) to: select, from a range of latency values, a target latency for executing input/output (I/O) operations based on a queue depth of a queue that includes a plurality of I/O operations (Fig. 1, and steps 105, 110, and 115, where a latency in the form of a priority is chosen to enable the I/O operation, para. 0025); and perform one or more I/O operations of the plurality of I/O operations according to a throughput value that is determined based on the selected target latency (Fig. 1, and step 135 where operations occur, para. 0026). As to claim 35, Ghoose discloses a computer program product disposed upon a non-transitory computer readable medium, the computer program product comprising computer program instructions (Fig. 1 operates on a system, comprising a computer, and related memory system, para. 0005) that, when executed, cause a computer to: select, from a range of latency values, a target latency for executing input/output (I/O) operations based on a queue depth of a queue that includes a plurality of I/O operations (Fig. 1, and steps 105, 110, and 115, where a latency in the form of a priority is chosen to enable the I/O operation, para. 0025); and perform one or more I/O operations of the plurality of I/O operations according to a throughput value that is determined based on the selected target latency (Fig. 1, and step 135 where operations occur, para. 0026). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 24, and 31 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US20160196231, US20170351437, and US20160119443, among others teach the management of latency in a computing system. . Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY DALEY whose telephone number is (571)272-3625. The examiner can normally be reached 7 - 3:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dr. Henry Tsai can be reached at 571 2724176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.A.D/Examiner, Art Unit 2184 /HENRY TSAI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2184
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706787
EQUALIZATION TRAINING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701092
TRANSMISSION DEVICE, RECEPTION DEVICE, TRANSMISSION METHOD, RECEPTION METHOD, AND MOVABLE ENTITY
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699673
MULTI-PROCESSOR DEVICE WITH EXTERNAL INTERFACE FAILOVER
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689167
INTERFACE APPARATUS FOR DRIVING OPEN PLUGGABLE SPECIFICATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12687888
NETWORK-CAPABLE DOCKING STATION
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+10.5%)
2y 7m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 833 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month