Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/020,060

ADJUSTING STRUCTURE AND LOUVER WINDOW WITH ADJUSTABLE DIVIDING STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Priority
Oct 23, 2024 — TW 113211496
Examiner
AGUDELO, PAOLA
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
UNION WINNER INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
590 granted / 767 resolved
+24.9% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
784
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 767 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 8 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 is unclear because it recites a “third fastener”, however no first or second fasteners have been claimed in the preceding claim thus rendering the scope of the claim unascertainable. For examining purposes, the claim is examined as depending from claim 4 which claims the first and second fasteners and provides antecedent basis for the third fastener. Claim 18 is unclear because it recites a “third fastener”, however no first or second fasteners have been claimed in the preceding claim thus rendering the scope of the claim unascertainable. For examining purposes, the claim is examined as depending from claim 16 which claims the first and second fasteners and provides antecedent basis for the third fastener. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7, 9, 12-17, 20, 22-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chen et al. US 2018/0030736 A1 (hereinafter ‘Chen’). In regard to claim 1, Chen teaches a louver window (fig. 1) with an adjustable dividing structure, the louver window comprising: a plurality of jambs (10a/10b); at least one vertical pillar (14); and a connecting piece (20) disposed between one of the jams and an end of the vertical pillar (shown in fig. 3), the connecting piece having a first fastened portion (201) and a second fastened portion (202) formed on the first fastened portion; wherein the connecting piece is only combined with the vertical pillar (see fig. 5-6), the vertical pillar and the connecting piece are movable relative to the plurality of jambs together (Note that the connecting piece is combined only with the vertical pillar when the locking member 22 is loosened as noted in [0039]). In regard to claims 2, 4, 5 and 15, Chen teaches the claimed invention wherein the second fastened portion protrudes from a center of the first fastened portion (see fig. 7); at least one end of the first fastened portion is provided with a fastening groove (201d); the second fastened portion is provided with at least one fastening hole (201c). In regard to claims 3, 16 and 17, Chen teaches the claimed invention wherein a first fastener (22) is inserted through the fastening groove of the first fastened portion (fig. 6); and at least one second fastener (24) is inserted through the fastening hole of the second fastened portion (fig. 6); the connecting piece is combined to said one of the jambs with the first fastener; the connecting piece is combined to the vertical pillar with the second fastener (see fig. 11). In regard to claims 6, Chen teaches the claimed invention wherein the vertical pillar is formed on a bottom side thereof with a vertical pillar fastened portion (see fig. 6 and [0036]); at least one end of the first fastened portion is provided with a fastening groove (201d); the second fastened portion is provided with at least one fastening hole (201c). In regard to claim 7, Chen teaches the claimed invention wherein a first fastener (22) is inserted through the fastening groove of the first fastened portion (fig. 6); and at least one second fastener (24) is inserted through the fastening hole of the second fastened portion (fig. 6); the connecting piece is combined to said one of the jambs with the first fastener; the connecting piece is combined to the vertical pillar with the second fastener (see fig. 11). In regard to claim 9, Chen teaches the claimed invention wherein the plurality of jambs has a recess (10c, see [0032]) for accommodating the connecting piece; the connecting piece is movable in the recess (see [0038]). In regard to claims 12 and 22, Chen teaches the claimed invention wherein the louver window further comprises a covering piece (18) covering the connecting piece and forming an opening that corresponds to the second fastened portion of the connecting piece (see figs. 6, 7). In regard to claim 13 and 23, Chen teaches the claimed invention wherein the covering piece has two bending portions located adjacent to two sides of the opening respectively. Given that the bending portions lack any structure in the claim, per broadest reasonable interpretation the portions adjacent to the opening are capable of being bending portions since they are narrow portions of material which facilitate bending the piece. In regard to claim 14, Chen teaches an adjusting structure, which is disposed between a first element (10b) and a second element (14), the adjusting structure comprising: a connecting piece (20) having a first fastened portion (201) and a second fastened portion (202) formed on the first fastened portion; wherein when the connecting piece is only combined with the second element, the second element and the connecting piece are movable on the first element together (Note that the connecting piece is combined only with the vertical pillar when the locking member 22 is loosened as noted in [0039]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 10, 20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen. In regard to claims 10 and 20, Chen teaches the claimed invention wherein the louver window further comprises a covering piece (18) covering the connecting piece and forming an opening that corresponds to the second fastened portion of the connecting piece (see figs. 6, 7). Chen’s covering piece does not comprise two pieces. It would have been an obvious matter of design choice to provide the covering piece as two separate pieces so as to facilitate installation and because such modification would have yielded no more than the predictable result of providing cover. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8 and 18 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 11, 19 and 21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: For claims 8 and 18 (providing the claims depend from claims 4 and 16 respectively), the prior art of record does not teach or suggest an adjusting structure disposed between first and second elements comprising a connecting piece that when combined with the second element, both the connecting piece and the second element are movable. Wherein the connecting piece comprises a first fastener inserted through a fastening groove to combine the connecting piece to the first element and a second fastener inserted through a fastening hole to combine the connecting piece to the second element as recited within the context of the claim, and wherein a third fastener is inserted through a fastening hole provided on one end of a first fastened portion of the connecting piece to combine the connecting piece to the first element. For claims 11 and 21, the prior art of record does not teach or suggest an adjusting structure disposed between first and second elements comprising a connecting piece having two covering pieces covering the connecting piece wherein each end of the each of the two covering pieces is formed with a gradually narrowing portion and an open groove surrounded by the gradually narrowing portion such that when the two covering pieces are abutted against each other, the open grooves collectively form the opening as recited within the context of the claim. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAOLA AGUDELO whose telephone number is (571)270-7986. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM - 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian E Glessner can be reached at 571-272-6754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAOLA AGUDELO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 14, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750991
EMP PROTECTION FOR STRUCTURES HAVING COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUAL COMPONENTS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747576
Post Tension and Cantilever Connection Assembly for a Modular Construction
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12729533
CORNER TRACKS FOR PANELIZED WALL SYSTEMS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723410
MODULAR STAIRCASE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12703974
Premanufactured Wall Systems
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.2%)
1y 10m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 767 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month