Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/020,231

RECONSTRUCTION OF FLANGE ELLIPSES TO DETECT MISALIGNMENT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Examiner
SETH, MANAV
Art Unit
2672
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Saudi Arabian Oil Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
728 granted / 803 resolved
+28.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
809
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§103
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 803 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement 1. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 01/24/2025 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 3. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1, 8 and 15 recites the limitation "wherein a size of the downscaled images is iteratively increased". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim(s). The claim(s) before this limitation only talks about one single downscaled image, and claim(s) nowhere cites multiple downscaled images, and makes the claim(s) 1, 8 and 15 indefinite. Therefore claims 1, 8 and 15 are rejected as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. All other claims depending on claims 1, 8 and 15 are rejected at least for being dependent on claims 1, 18 and 15. For examining purposes, a single downloaded image is considered rather than multiple downscaled images. With respect to prior art analysis of claims 1, 8 and 15, the closest prior art(s) of record (e.g. Sun et al., 2021, “A Coaxial Alignment Method for Large Flange Parts Assembly Using Multiple Local Images” (pp. 16716-16727)) teaches analyzing flange joint using flange edges in binary images using circle extraction (see figures 6 and 10); but does not teach “applying a transformation to extract a first ellipse and a second ellipse corresponding to the at least two detected edges identified in the binary image, wherein a size of the downscaled image is iteratively increased, edges detected at each iteration, and ellipses extracted based on the detected edges until ellipses are extracted from an original size image; estimating a position and an orientation of the first ellipse and the second ellipse extracted from the original size image; and quantifying an alignment of the flanges based on a position and an orientation of the first ellipse and the second ellipse”. Conclusion 4. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. Penaluna et al., 2019, “Imaging of flange bore internal defects using phased array ultrasonic testing” (pp. 528-535), discloses flange bore inspection. Ohtani et al, U.S. Patent No. 11,933,742, discloses binarized image data for flange portion inspection (col. 20, lines 1-6). Xu et al., Chinese Patent Application No. CN 201521132593 U, discloses flange joint inspection. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Manav Seth whose telephone number is (571) 272-7456. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday from 8:30 am to 5:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Sumati Lefkowitz, can be reached on (571) 272-3638. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Manav Seth/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2672 August 7, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 14, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749216
TECHNIQUES FOR TRACKING ONE OR MORE OBJECTS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749169
MODEL TRAINING METHOD, VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND DEVICE AND MEDIUM
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12725224
FREQUENCY BASED COLOR MOIRÉ PATTERN DETECTION
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12718320
X-RAY SUPER-RESOLUTION ASSESSMENT VIA SPATIAL FILTERING
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12718569
DETECTION METHOD AND DETECTION DEVICE FOR DETECTING FAULT OF INSULATOR DISCHARGE BASED ON IMAGE RECOGNITION
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+8.0%)
2y 9m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 803 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month