Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/020,545

ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR REDUCING POWER CONSUMPTION THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Priority
Sep 22, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0119966 +1 more
Examiner
ALVAREZ, RAQUEL
Art Unit
3622
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
Est. Remaining
57%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allowance Rate
306 granted / 617 resolved
-2.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
646
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§103
38.1%
-1.9% vs TC avg
§102
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 617 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to communication filed on 7/7/2026. Claims 1, 3-4, 6, 8-11, 13-15, 17-18 and 20 are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the first UI" in line 14. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 11 recites the limitation "the first UI" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 15 recites the limitation "the first UI" in line 6. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3-4, 6, 8-11, 13-15, 17-18 and 20 are allowable over prior art of record. The closest prior art of record, Raveendran (KR 20100137007) teaches electronic device with a display configured to operate at one of a plurality of low-power modes. The display assess available power, selects a mode from a plurality of modes, and adjusts image quality to achieve a specific power savings amount tied to that level. Raveendran fail to disclose or suggest “identify a final power consumption reduction amount corresponding to the selected level by combining the power consumption amounts corresponding of each of the plurality of image quality processing elements” where the plurality of image quality elements include “driving processing, contrast ratio processing, motion processing, noise processing, sharpness processing and color processing”. Kim (KR 20160109487) teaches incentive information based on the actual power reduction amount, due to the power saving operation of the electrical product and the power reduction amount. The combination of Raveendran and Kim fail to teach “based on a viewing time being equal or greater than a predetermined reference viewing time, control the display to display information about the identified user reward and the identified final consumption reduction amount” Response to Arguments The 101 rejections have been withdrawn. The claim pertains to an abstract idea of providing a reward based on viewing times. The Examiner wants to point out that the concept of providing a reward based on viewing times, which is an abstract idea under advertising, marketing or sales activities or behaviors, the additional elements are implementing specific controls that improve the operation of the display. The feedback UI does not merely display information; it receives user input that directly controls execution of a power consumption reduction mode, which changes how the display operates through the six image quality processing operations. Point of contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAQUEL ALVAREZ whose telephone number is (571)272-6715. The examiner can normally be reached Mondays thru Thursdays 8:30-6:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ilana Spar can be reached at 571-270-7537. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAQUEL ALVAREZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 03, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 03, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 04, 2026
Response Filed
May 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 07, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12711521
System and Method for Tracking and Rewarding Users and Providing Targeted Advertising
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12682998
HEALTH PASS SYSTEMS AND METHODS
5y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12657605
DYNAMICALLY ARRANGED DIGITAL CIRCULARS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12632883
RECOMMENDATION MODEL TRAINING METHOD, RECOMMENDATION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12554788
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING MEDIA CONTENT OVER AN ELECTRONIC NETWORK
2y 6m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
57%
With Interview (+7.2%)
4y 5m (~2y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 617 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month