Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/020,555

COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, NETWORK CONFIGURATION SYSTEM, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Priority
Apr 18, 2024 — JP 2024-067236
Examiner
SANDHU, AMRITBIR K
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
National University Corporation Tokai National Higher Education and Research System
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
594 granted / 716 resolved
+23.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
722
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
63.3%
+23.3% vs TC avg
§102
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 716 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement filed Statement filed on 01/14/2025 has been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 USC 103 as being unpatentable over Schmogrow et al; (US 12250501) in view of Graves (US 6882800). Regarding claim 1, Schmogrow discloses a communication apparatus comprising a node included in a network configuration in an optical network,(optical switching node 100, see figure 1B) wherein the node includes layers of two or more kinds of different switch granularities;(optical switching node 100 with first switched layer 120 is a wavelength switched domain or wavelength switched layer and the second switched layer 130 is a fiber switched domain or fiber switched layer, see column 5, lines 50-54 and figure 1B) and connects the layers with respect to a node;(each of the first and second switching layers 120, 130 are connected to the OCSs 102, 104 such that incoming optical signals can be routed from either OCS to either one of the first and second switching layers 120, 130 and outgoing optical signals can be routed from either one of the first and second switching layers 120, 130 to either OCS, see column 5, lines 55-60 and figure 1B). However, Schmogrow does not explicitly disclose of another adjacent communication apparatus. In a related field of endeavor, Graves discloses of another adjacent communication apparatus; (incoming DWDM optical signals are input to a multi-plane optical switching system in which they can be switched to other fibers, split into lambda groups and switched at that level, then switched by the lambda granularity layer 3 of the system 10, and later combined into lambda groups, and finally multiplexed, into outgoing DWDM optical signals, see column 6, lines 10-18 and figure 3). Thus, it would be obvious for one of the ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to combine the incoming and outgoing signals of Graves with Schmogrow to provide optical switching with multiple layers for switching optical signals and the motivation is increased efficiency and capacity of the optical switching system. Regarding claim 2, Schmogrow discloses the communication apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the node includes a wavelength cross-connect layer (parallel arrangement of a switching node 300 for arranging multiple types of switching layers in parallel to one another, see column 7, lines 6-8 and figure 3) including a wavelength cross-connect switch configured to perform switching in a wavelength unit, ( wavelength switched layer 310, see figure 3) and a fiber cross-connect layer including a fiber cross-connect switch configured to perform switching in a fiber unit,( fiber switched layer 330, see figure 3) and each of the wavelength cross-connect switch and the fiber cross-connect switch is connected to an optical path with respect to the node of the ;(switching operations at the OCS 340 may be used to control to which of the switching layers 310, 320, 330 an incoming optical signal is sent, see column 7, lines 16-19 and figure 3). However, Schmogrow does not explicitly disclose another adjacent communication apparatus. In a related field of endeavor, Graves discloses another adjacent communication apparatus; (incoming DWDM optical signals are input to a multi-plane optical switching system in which they can be switched to other fibers, split into lambda groups and switched at that level, then switched by the lambda granularity layer 3 of the system 10, and later combined into lambda groups, and finally multiplexed, into outgoing DWDM optical signals, see column 6, lines 10-18 and figure 3). Motivation same as claim 1. Regarding claim 3, Schmogrow discloses the communication apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the wavelength cross-connect switch switches (parallel arrangement of a switching node 300 for arranging multiple types of switching layers in parallel to one another, see column 7, lines 6-8 and figure 3) in such a way that the optical path is connected to the wavelength cross-connect switch; ( wavelength switched layer 310, see figure 3) or the fiber cross-connect switch (fiber switched layer 330, see figure 3) and the fiber cross-connect switch switches in such a way that the optical path is connected to the wavelength cross-connect switch or the fiber cross-connect switch in;( switching operations at the OCS 340 may be used to control to which of the switching layers 310, 320, 330 an incoming optical signal is sent, see column 7, lines 16-19 and figure 3). However, Schmogrow does not explicitly disclose the another adjacent communication apparatus in another adjacent communication apparatus. In a related field of endeavor, Graves, discloses the another adjacent communication apparatus in another adjacent communication apparatus; (incoming DWDM optical signals are input to a multi-plane optical switching system in which they can be switched to other fibers, split into lambda groups and switched at that level, then switched by the lambda granularity layer 3 of the system 10, and later combined into lambda groups, and finally multiplexed, into outgoing DWDM optical signals, see column 6, lines 10-18 and figure 3). Motivation same as claim 1. Regarding claim 4, Schmogrow discloses the communication apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the wavelength cross-connect switch is configured in such a way that the fiber cross-connect switch and the optical path are not connected to each other; (the fiber switched layer 130 may include a WSS 132 to multiplex/demultiplex wavelength division multiplex (WDM) signals and may further include OCSs 134 at outputs of the fiber switched layer 130 to control the particular degree of the switching node 100 to which the combined or separated optical signals are routed, see column 6, lines 19-25 and figure 1B). Regarding claim 5, Schmogrow discloses the communication apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the node includes a wavelength cross-connect layer including a wavelength cross-connect switch configured to perform switching in a wavelength unit, (parallel arrangement of a switching node 300 for arranging multiple types of switching layers in parallel to one another, see column 7, lines 6-8 and figure 3) a wavelength band cross-connect layer including a wavelength band cross-connect switch configured to perform switching of a wavelength band being a bundle of a plurality of wavelengths,(the wavelength switched layer 120 includes a wavelength selective switch (WSS) 122 through which the incoming optical signal is routed. The WSS 122 may control whether the optical signal is passed based on the wavelength of the optical signal, see column 5, lines 62-65) and a fiber cross-connect layer including a fiber cross-connect switch configured to perform switching in a fiber unit, and each of the wavelength cross-connect switch,(the fiber switched layer 130 includes a switching architecture for controlling the routing of optical signals based on the optical fibers over which they are carried, see column 17, lines 16-18) the wavelength band cross-connect switch, and the fiber cross-connect switch is connected to an optical path with respect to the node;( switching operations at the OCS 340 may be used to control to which of the switching layers 310, 320, 330 an incoming optical signal is sent, see column 7, lines 16-19 and figure 3). However, Schmogrow does not explicitly disclose of the another adjacent communication apparatus. In a related field of endeavor, Graves discloses of the another adjacent communication apparatus (incoming DWDM optical signals are input to a multi-plane optical switching system in which they can be switched to other fibers, split into lambda groups and switched at that level, then switched by the lambda granularity layer 3 of the system 10, and later combined into lambda groups, and finally multiplexed, into outgoing DWDM optical signals, see column 6, lines 10-18 and figure 3). Motivation same as claim 1. Regarding claim 6, Schmogrow discloses the communication apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the wavelength cross-connect switch switches ;( cascaded arrangement of a switching node 400 for arranging multiple types of switching layers in a cascaded configuration, see column 7, lines 24-26 and figure 4) in such a way that the optical path is connected to any one of the wavelength cross-connect switch, the wavelength band cross-connect switch, and the fiber cross-connect switch ;( a respective first cascaded OCS 440 is provided at each degree of the switching node 400 to receive optical signals from the optical transport fibers at the degree, and to direct the incoming optical signals to either a switching layer of a coarsest granularity (fiber switched layer 430) or to a next cascaded path, see column 7, lines 24-26 and figure 4), the wavelength band cross-connect switch switches in such a way that the optical path is connected to any one of the wavelength cross-connect switch, the wavelength band cross-connect switch, and the fiber cross-connect switch in ;(the next cascaded path feeds the incoming optical signal to a next cascaded OCS 460 to direct the incoming optical signals to either a switching layer of a next-coarsest granularity or to a further cascaded path. In the example of FIG. 4, the switching layer having the next-coarsest granularity is the band switched layer 420, see column 7, lines 36-41 and figure 4) and the fiber cross-connect switch switches in such a way that the optical path is connected to any one of the wavelength cross-connect switch, the wavelength band cross-connect switch, and the fiber cross-connect switch; (the further cascaded path feeds the incoming optical signal to the switching layer having the finest granularity, which in this case is the wavelength switched layer 410, see column 7, lines 41-44 and figure 4). However, Schmogrow does not explicitly disclose in the another adjacent communication apparatus, the another adjacent communication apparatus. In a related field of endeavor, Graves disclose in the another adjacent communication apparatus, the another adjacent communication apparatus (incoming DWDM optical signals are input to a multi-plane optical switching system in which they can be switched to other fibers, split into lambda groups and switched at that level, then switched by the lambda granularity layer 3 of the system 10, and later combined into lambda groups, and finally multiplexed, into outgoing DWDM optical signals, see column 6, lines 10-18 and figure 3). Motivation same as claim 1. Regarding claim 7, Schmogrow discloses the communication apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the wavelength cross-connect switch; (parallel arrangement of a switching node 300 for arranging multiple types of switching layers in parallel to one another, see column 7, lines 6-8 and figure 3) is configured in such a way that the optical path is not connected to the wavelength band cross-connect switch and the fiber cross-connect switch, (the wavelength switched layer 120 includes a wavelength selective switch (WSS) 122 through which the incoming optical signal is routed. The WSS 122 may control whether the optical signal is passed based on the wavelength of the optical signal, see column 5, lines 62-65) and the wavelength band cross-connect switch is configured in such a way that the optical path is not connected to the fiber cross-connect switch ,(the fiber switched layer 130 includes a switching architecture for controlling the routing of optical signals based on the optical fibers over which they are carried, see column 17, lines 16-18). Regarding claim 8, Schmogrow discloses the communication apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the node includes a wavelength converter disposed at a preceding stage of the wavelength cross-connect switch ;( some or all of the degrees of the node can be connected to one another and route optical signals between one another without having to route the optical signals through a WSS. This may also be beneficial for nodes that include signal filtering or splitting components that do not require wavelength switching, see column 4, lines 6-11). Regarding claim 9, Schmogrow discloses the communication apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the node includes a wavelength filter disposed at a preceding stage of the wavelength converter ;( switching operations at the OCS 340 may be used to control to which of the switching layers 310, 320, 330 an incoming optical signal is sent. Additionally, each switching layer 310, 320, 330, may include its own respective OCS between the OCS 340 and the filtering and switching elements of the switching layer, see column 7, lines 16-21) Regarding claim 10, Schmogrow discloses the communication apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the node includes a controller configured to perform at least one of adding and dropping of the optical path ;(the WSS 122 may control whether the optical signal is passed based on the wavelength of the optical signal. If the optical signal is passed, then a multi-node mesh, such as a fiber shuffle module (FSM) 124, connected to an add-drop architecture, such as a multi-cast switch (MCS), may be used to combine or separate optical signals of different wavelengths with or from one another, see column 5, lines 63-67 and column 6, lines 1,2). Regarding claim 11, Schmogrow discloses a network configuration system,(optical switching node 100, see figure 1B) comprising a plurality of communication apparatuses including a node included in a network configuration in an optical network,( The switching node 100 is an N-degree node, whereby N is a positive integer greater than two. Optical signals may be received at the node 100 from one of the degrees and routed to one or more of the other degrees through the switching network of the switching node 100, see column 4, lines 62-67 and figure 1a) wherein the node of each communication apparatus includes layers of two or more kinds of different switch granularities ;(optical switching node 100 with first switched layer 120 is a wavelength switched domain or wavelength switched layer and the second switched layer 130 is a fiber switched domain or fiber switched layer, see column 5, lines 50-54 and figure 1B) and the node of a first communication apparatus connects the layers with respect to the node ;(each of the first and second switching layers 120, 130 are connected to the OCSs 102, 104 such that incoming optical signals can be routed from either OCS to either one of the first and second switching layers 120, 130 and outgoing optical signals can be routed from either one of the first and second switching layers 120, 130 to either OCS, see column 5, lines 55-60 and figure 1B). However, Schmogrow does not explicitly disclose of an adjacent second communication apparatus. In a related field of endeavor, Graves discloses of an adjacent second communication apparatus; (incoming DWDM optical signals are input to a multi-plane optical switching system in which they can be switched to other fibers, split into lambda groups and switched at that level, then switched by the lambda granularity layer 3 of the system 10, and later combined into lambda groups, and finally multiplexed, into outgoing DWDM optical signals, see column 6, lines 10-18 and figure 3). Thus, it would be obvious for one of the ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to combine the incoming and outgoing signals of Graves with Schmogrow to provide optical switching with multiple layers for switching optical signals and the motivation is increased efficiency and capacity of the optical switching system. Regarding claim 12, Schmogrow discloses the network configuration system according to claim 11, wherein the node of each communication apparatus includes a wavelength cross-connect layer (parallel arrangement of a switching node 300 for arranging multiple types of switching layers in parallel to one another, see column 7, lines 6-8 and figure 3) including a wavelength cross-connect switch configured to perform switching in a wavelength unit, ( wavelength switched layer 310, see figure 3) and a fiber cross-connect layer including a fiber cross-connect switch configured to perform switching in a fiber unit, (fiber switched layer 330, see figure 3) and each of the wavelength cross-connect switch and the fiber cross-connect switch of the first communication apparatus is connected to an optical path with respect to the node ;(switching operations at the OCS 340 may be used to control to which of the switching layers 310, 320, 330 an incoming optical signal is sent, see column 7, lines 16-19 and figure 3). However, Schmogrow does not explicitly disclose of the second communication apparatus. In a related field of endeavor, Graves discloses of the second communication apparatus; (incoming DWDM optical signals are input to a multi-plane optical switching system in which they can be switched to other fibers, split into lambda groups and switched at that level, then switched by the lambda granularity layer 3 of the system 10, and later combined into lambda groups, and finally multiplexed, into outgoing DWDM optical signals, see column 6, lines 10-18 and figure 3). Motivation same as claim 11. Regarding claim 13, Schmogrow discloses the network configuration system according to claim 12, wherein the wavelength cross-connect switch of the first communication apparatus switches (parallel arrangement of a switching node 300 for arranging multiple types of switching layers in parallel to one another, see column 7, lines 6-8 and figure 3) in such a way that the optical path is connected to the wavelength cross-connect switch ; (wavelength switched layer 310, see figure 3) or the fiber cross-connect switch (fiber switched layer 330, see figure 3) and the fiber cross-connect switch (fiber switched layer 330, see figure 3) of the first communication apparatus switches in such a way that the optical path is connected to the wavelength cross-connect switch or the fiber cross-connect switch ;( switching operations at the OCS 340 may be used to control to which of the switching layers 310, 320, 330 an incoming optical signal is sent, see column 7, lines 16-19 and figure 3). However, Schmogrow does not explicitly disclose in the second communication apparatus, in the second communication apparatus. In a related field of endeavor, Graves discloses in the second communication apparatus, in the second communication apparatus ; (incoming DWDM optical signals are input to a multi-plane optical switching system in which they can be switched to other fibers, split into lambda groups and switched at that level, then switched by the lambda granularity layer 3 of the system 10, and later combined into lambda groups, and finally multiplexed, into outgoing DWDM optical signals, see column 6, lines 10-18 and figure 3). Motivation same as claim 11. Regarding claim 14, Schmogrow discloses the network configuration system according to claim 12, wherein the wavelength cross-connect switch of the first communication apparatus is configured in such a way that the optical path is not connected to the fiber cross-connect switch of the first communication apparatus; (the fiber switched layer 130 may include a WSS 132 to multiplex/demultiplex wavelength division multiplex (WDM) signals and may further include OCSs 134 at outputs of the fiber switched layer 130 to control the particular degree of the switching node 100 to which the combined or separated optical signals are routed, see column 6, lines 19-25 and figure 1B). Regarding claim 15, Schmogrow discloses the network configuration system according to claim 11, wherein the node of each communication apparatus includes a wavelength cross-connect layer including a wavelength cross-connect switch configured to perform switching in a wavelength unit, (parallel arrangement of a switching node 300 for arranging multiple types of switching layers in parallel to one another, see column 7, lines 6-8 and figure 3) a wavelength band cross-connect layer including a wavelength band cross-connect switch configured to perform switching of a wavelength band being a bundle of a plurality of wavelengths, (the wavelength switched layer 120 includes a wavelength selective switch (WSS) 122 through which the incoming optical signal is routed. The WSS 122 may control whether the optical signal is passed based on the wavelength of the optical signal, see column 5, lines 62-65) and a fiber cross-connect layer including a fiber cross-connect switch configured to perform switching in a fiber unit, and each of the wavelength cross-connect switch, ,(the fiber switched layer 130 includes a switching architecture for controlling the routing of optical signals based on the optical fibers over which they are carried, see column 17, lines 16-18) the wavelength band cross-connect switch, and the fiber cross-connect switch of the first communication apparatus is connected to an optical path with respect to the node ;( switching operations at the OCS 340 may be used to control to which of the switching layers 310, 320, 330 an incoming optical signal is sent, see column 7, lines 16-19 and figure 3). However, Schmogrow does not explicitly disclose of the second communication apparatus. In a related field of endeavor, Graves discloses of the second communication apparatus ; (incoming DWDM optical signals are input to a multi-plane optical switching system in which they can be switched to other fibers, split into lambda groups and switched at that level, then switched by the lambda granularity layer 3 of the system 10, and later combined into lambda groups, and finally multiplexed, into outgoing DWDM optical signals, see column 6, lines 10-18 and figure 3). Motivation same as claim 11. Regarding claim 16, Schmogrow discloses the network configuration system according to claim 15, wherein the wavelength cross-connect switch of the first communication apparatus switches ;( cascaded arrangement of a switching node 400 for arranging multiple types of switching layers in a cascaded configuration, see column 7, lines 24-26 and figure 4) in such a way that the optical path is connected to any one of the wavelength cross-connect switch, the wavelength band cross-connect switch, and the fiber cross-connect switch in the wavelength band cross-connect switch of the first communication apparatus switches;( a respective first cascaded OCS 440 is provided at each degree of the switching node 400 to receive optical signals from the optical transport fibers at the degree, and to direct the incoming optical signals to either a switching layer of a coarsest granularity (fiber switched layer 430) or to a next cascaded path, see column 7, lines 24-26 and figure 4), in such a way that the optical path is connected to any one of the wavelength cross-connect switch, the wavelength band cross-connect switch, and the fiber cross-connect switch in the second communication apparatus;(the next cascaded path feeds the incoming optical signal to a next cascaded OCS 460 to direct the incoming optical signals to either a switching layer of a next-coarsest granularity or to a further cascaded path. In the example of FIG. 4, the switching layer having the next-coarsest granularity is the band switched layer 420, see column 7, lines 36-41 and figure 4) and the fiber cross-connect switch of the first communication apparatus switches in such a way that the optical path is connected to any one of the wavelength cross-connect switch, the wavelength band cross-connect switch, and the fiber cross-connect switch ; (the further cascaded path feeds the incoming optical signal to the switching layer having the finest granularity, which in this case is the wavelength switched layer 410, see column 7, lines 41-44 and figure 4). However, Schmogrow does not explicitly disclose the second communication apparatus, in the second communication apparatus. In a related field of endeavor, Graves disclose the second communication apparatus, in the second communication apparatus; (incoming DWDM optical signals are input to a multi-plane optical switching system in which they can be switched to other fibers, split into lambda groups and switched at that level, then switched by the lambda granularity layer 3 of the system 10, and later combined into lambda groups, and finally multiplexed, into outgoing DWDM optical signals, see column 6, lines 10-18 and figure 3). Motivation same as claim 11. Regarding claim 17, Schmogrow discloses the network configuration system according to claim 15, wherein the wavelength cross-connect switch ; (parallel arrangement of a switching node 300 for arranging multiple types of switching layers in parallel to one another, see column 7, lines 6-8 and figure 3) of the first communication apparatus is configured in such a way that the optical path is not connected to the wavelength band cross-connect switch and the fiber cross-connect switch of the first communication apparatus, (the wavelength switched layer 120 includes a wavelength selective switch (WSS) 122 through which the incoming optical signal is routed. The WSS 122 may control whether the optical signal is passed based on the wavelength of the optical signal, see column 5, lines 62-65) and the wavelength band cross-connect switch of the first communication apparatus is configured in such a way that the optical path is not connected to the fiber cross-connect switch of the first communication apparatus ,(the fiber switched layer 130 includes a switching architecture for controlling the routing of optical signals based on the optical fibers over which they are carried, see column 17, lines 16-18). Regarding claim 18, Schmogrow discloses the network configuration system according to claim 12, wherein the node of each communication apparatus includes a wavelength converter disposed at a preceding stage of the wavelength cross-connect switch ;( some or all of the degrees of the node can be connected to one another and route optical signals between one another without having to route the optical signals through a WSS. This may also be beneficial for nodes that include signal filtering or splitting components that do not require wavelength switching, see column 4, lines 6-11). Regarding claim 19, Schmogrow discloses the network configuration system according to claim 18, wherein the node of each communication apparatus includes a wavelength filter disposed at a preceding stage of the wavelength converter ;( switching operations at the OCS 340 may be used to control to which of the switching layers 310, 320, 330 an incoming optical signal is sent. Additionally, each switching layer 310, 320, 330, may include its own respective OCS between the OCS 340 and the filtering and switching elements of the switching layer, see column 7, lines 16-21) Regarding claim 20, Schmogrow discloses a communication method comprising a step of connecting layers between a node being included in a network configuration in an optical network and including the layers of two or more kinds of different switch granularities;(optical switching node 100 with first switched layer 120 is a wavelength switched domain or wavelength switched layer and the second switched layer 130 is a fiber switched domain or fiber switched layer, see column 5, lines 50-54 and figure 1B) and another adjacent node ;(each of the first and second switching layers 120, 130 are connected to the OCSs 102, 104 such that incoming optical signals can be routed from either OCS to either one of the first and second switching layers 120, 130 and outgoing optical signals can be routed from either one of the first and second switching layers 120, 130 to either OCS, see column 5, lines 55-60 and figure 1B). Conclusion 3. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure is reproduced below. a. Beshai (US 2004/0037558) discloses an optical network 100 with the optical core nodes 104 may have different levels of switching granularities, see figure 1. b. Ludovic et al; (EP 1193995A1) discloses an optical switch implementing a multi-granularity architecture and the number of granularity levels is three: the wavelength, the wavelength band and the fiber, see figure 1. c. Jenkins et al; (WO 2007/073382A1) discloses a network design that reduces the number of wavelengths needed to support communications in a Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) network, see figure 13. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMRITBIR K SANDHU whose telephone number is (571)270-1894. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am to 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Vanderpuye can be reached at 571-272-3078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMRITBIR K SANDHU/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2634
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 14, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750611
Auto-provisioning optical channels based on spectrum monitoring
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750149
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TWO-WAY DELAY ERROR COMPENSATION IN COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739034
METHOD AND APPARATUS TO INCREASE OPTIC LINE CAPACITY
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739031
RADIO FREQUENCY LINK TRANSMISSION OF UPLINK COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH VISIBLE LIGHT COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732297
WAVELENGTH CONVERSION DEVICE AND OPTICAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 716 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month