Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/020,639

LEARNING IN RAHT DOMAIN FOR POINT CLOUD ATTRIBUTE CODING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Examiner
TRUONG, NGUYEN T
Art Unit
2486
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
InterDigital Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
479 granted / 579 resolved
+24.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
592
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 579 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is sent in response to Applicant’s Communication received 26 May 2026 for application number 19/020,639. The Office hereby acknowledges receipt of the following and placed of record in file: Specification, Drawings, Abstract, Oath/Declaration, Claims. Claims 1-10 are presented for examination. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on the following dates are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and are being considered by the Examiner: 6/10/26; 7/7/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chou et al. (US 2017/0347100). Regarding claim 1, Chou discloses a method (figs. 7, 8) comprising: decoding (fig. 8, step 820) features representing Region-Adaptive Hierarchical Transform (RAHT) coefficients corresponding to a point cloud frame (fig. 7, step 720: transform coefficients for attributes of occupied points of point cloud data”) at a current resolution (implicitly disclosed); reconstructing the RAHT coefficients corresponding to the point cloud frame at the current resolution (fig. 8, step 830: inverse quantize transform coefficients); and performing a RAHT inverse transform based on the reconstructed RAHT coefficients (fig. 8, step 840: perform inverse region adaptive hierarchical transform on transform coefficients for attributes of occupied points). Regarding claim 2, see teachings of claim 1. Chou further discloses wherein performing the RAHT inverse transform comprises: performing a RAHT inverse transform along a z-direction; performing a RAHT inverse transform along a y-direction; and performing a RAHT inverse transform along an x-direction (fig. 13). Regarding claim 3, see teachings of claims 1 and 2. Chou further discloses wherein performing the RAHT inverse transform along the z-direction generates 2 intermediate DC coefficients ; wherein performing the RAHT inverse transform along the y-direction generates 4 intermediate DC coefficients; and wherein performing the RAHT inverse transform along then x-direction generates 8 intermediate DC coefficients (fig. 13, “g^”). Regarding claim 4, see teachings of claim 1. Chou further discloses wherein reconstructing the RAHT coefficients generates only a DC RAHT coefficient at the current resolution (par. 165, in the last stage). Regarding claim 5, see teachings of claim 1. Chou further discloses wherein reconstructing the RAHT coefficients generates only AC RAHT coefficients at the current resolution (par. 162, in the higher levels of hierarchy). Regarding claim 6, see teachings of claims 1 and 5. Chou further discloses further comprising obtaining a DC RAHT coefficient from a parent level RAHT inverse transform (par. 167). Regarding claim 7, see teachings of claim 1. Chou further discloses wherein performing the RAHT inverse transform comprises performing a bottom-up procedure to determine weights for the RAHT inverse transform (par. 167). Regarding claim 8, see teachings of claim 1. Chou further discloses wherein performing the RAHT inverse transform comprises combining the RAHT coefficients at the current resolution level to produce a RAHT DC coefficient for a child level (par. 167). Regarding claim 9, see teachings of claim 1. Chou further discloses further comprising obtaining an encoded bitstream corresponding to the point cloud frame (fig. 5, step 510). Regarding claim 10, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 1. Prior Art not relied upon: Please refer to the references listed in attached PTO-892, which are not relied upon for the claim rejections, since these references are pertinent to the disclosure. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NGUYEN T TRUONG whose telephone number is (571)272-5262. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon - Fri, 6AM - 2PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JAMIE ATALA can be reached on 571-272-7384. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NGUYEN T TRUONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2486
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707083
Intra-Prediction Using a Cross-Component Linear Model in Video Coding
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12684117
WIDE ANGULAR INTRA PREDICTION
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676969
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMAGE FILTERING
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671805
Hypothetical Reference Decoder For Gradual Decoding Refresh
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666072
METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING A DEPTH IMAGE FROM A MULTIVIEW VIDEO, METHOD FOR DECODING A DATA STREAM REPRESENTATIVE OF A MULTIVIEW VIDEO, ENCODING METHOD, DEVICES, SYSTEM, TERMINAL EQUIPMENT, SIGNAL AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS CORRESPONDING THERETO
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+8.5%)
2y 4m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 579 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month