Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/020,979

FIELDER'S MASK WITH FLEXIBLE RETENTION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Examiner
PATEL, TAJASH D
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Rawlings Sporting Goods Company Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
1266 granted / 1567 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1602
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1567 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 9-11, 13, 23 and 25-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jurga et al.(US 2017/0246525) in view of Schmidt (US 9,027,163). Jurga et al. (hereinafter Jurga) discloses a field mask including a headband (110) configured to be positioned along at least a front part and encircles the head, subparagraph 33 attached to a plurality of bars forming at least part of a faceguard/facemask (200), the plurality of bars comprising two first bars and at least one second bar, wherein the at least one second bar (230) forms a lower part of the faceguard being positioned below each of a laterally extending portion (220), wherein each first bar of the two first bars includes the laterally- extending portion (220) and a transverse portion (245, 265) projecting downwardly from the laterally- extending portion (220), wherein the transverse portions positioned over the laterally-extending portions to the at least one second bar as shown in figures 6 and 10. Also, an elastic strap system with one of a plurality of straps (131-133), subparagraph 35 configured to secure the mask to the wearer being secured through opening (172) at a first portion of the headband (110) and extending rearwardly, subparagraph 35 and as shown in figure 7. A plate (150) is connected to a lower portion of the faceguard distal from the headband (110) and configured to support a chin guard/pad (140), subparagraph 32. Furthermore, each of the transverse portion (245, 265) attached at points (242, 262) extends laterally outwardly and downwardly between the at least one second bar (230) and the laterally extending portions of the two first bars as shown in figure 10. However, Jurga does not show the transverse portions connected to the laterally- extending portions to the at least one second bar. Schmidt discloses a facemask having transverse portions integrally connected (60) to the laterally-extending portions to the at least one second bar, col. 4, lines 46-64 and as shown in figure 6. It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention that each of the transverse portion projecting downwardly of the first two bars of Jurga defining bars (245, 265) being integrally connected to the laterally-extending portions as taught by Schmidt to the at least one second bar (230) on left and rights sides of the faceguard in order to make the connection smooth and reliable or as required for a particular application thereof. With regard to claims 9 and 13, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention that the headband of Jurga when viewed with Schmidt having a plate connected to a lower portion of the faceguard distal from the headband (110) encircling the head and configured to support a chin guard/pad (140) when viewed with Schmidt will substantially protect the chin and side portions of the face when the device is worn. With regard to claim 11, subparagraph 33 of Jurga discloses the headband (110) having an inner cushioning layer (112). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention that the headband (110) with the inner cushioning layer (112) of Jurga when viewed with Schmidt includes flexible portions configured to engage sides of the head to absorb force of impact or depending on end use thereof. Furthermore, with regard to claim 23, the limitation therein are met by Jurga ‘ 525 when viewed with Schmidt ‘163 as discussed above in paragraph 2. With regard to claim 25, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention that the elastic strap system of Jurga when viewed with Schmid having a harness (120) on a rear part of the head opposite the front part of the head connected to the headband can include but not limited to one or straps connected to the headband and extending rearwardly so that the device is adjustably worn about different sized head or depending on end use thereof. With regard to claim 26, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention that the headband of Jurga when viewed with Schmidt substantially encircles the head when the device is worn. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8, 12 and 24 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 2 and 12 with its respective dependents are allowable because the prior art does not teach or suggest the recitation therein including a mask with a faceguard having each of the first bar of two bars with a laterally extending portion and a transverse portion projecting downwardly form the laterally extending portion and the transverse portions connect the laterally extending portions to a second bar in combination two arms projected from a headband that extends behind the ears. Claim 14 with is respective dependents are allowable because the prior art does not teach or suggest the recitation therein including a mask including a faceguard attached to a headband with the faceguard having a pair of laterally- opposed first bars, wherein each first bar comprises a laterally-extending portion and a transverse portion extending transversely relative to the laterally-extending portion; and a laterally and downwardly extending second bar positioned at least partially below each laterally- extending portion; and one or more straps connected to the first portion of the headband or the flexible portion in combination two flexible portions projecting from the first portion to extending behind the ears. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Each of the prior art references cited on PTO-892 discloses a headgear having a facemask attached thereto. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TEJASH PATEL whose telephone number is (571)272-4993. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9am -5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Clinton Ostrup can be reached at (571) 272-5559. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. January 13, 2026 /TAJASH D PATEL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593885
SHOCK-ABSORBING ASSEMBLY AND BODY PROTECTION DEVICE INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593881
MOLLE RETENTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595606
TUFTING MACHINE AND METHOD OF TUFTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595607
TUFTING MACHINE AND METHOD OF TUFTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594894
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR STITCHING A THREE DIMENSIONAL FORMED COMPONENT AND COMPONENTS FORMED FROM THE METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+6.9%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1567 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month