Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/021,261

HINGE ASSEMBLY OF SCISSOR DOOR AND VEHICLE HAVING SAME

Final Rejection §102§103§112
Filed
Jan 15, 2025
Priority
Aug 05, 2022 — continuation of PCTCN2022110588
Examiner
STRIMBU, GREGORY J
Art Unit
3634
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Geely Automobile Research Institute (Ningbo) Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
520 granted / 926 resolved
+4.2% vs TC avg
Strong +80% interview lift
Without
With
+80.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
964
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
69.3%
+29.3% vs TC avg
§102
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 926 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following final office action is in response to the reply filed April 13, 2026. Drawings The drawing correction filed April 13, 2026 has been approved. Claim Objections Claim 12 is objected to because “at” on lines 8 and 9 brings the clarity of the claim into question because it is unclear what spatial relationship the applicant is attempting to set forth. Does “at” mean adjacent to or mounted on? Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 4-14 and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Recitations such as “applied to a scissor door” on line 1 of claim 1 render the claims indefinite because it is unclear what the applicant is attempting to set forth. How is a hinge assembly “applied” to a scissor door? Is the applicant attempting to positively recite the scissor door as an element of the invention. Recitations such as “a second axis” on line 2 of claim 6 render the claims indefinite because it is unclear if the applicant is referring to the second axis set forth above or is attempting to set forth another second axis in addition to the one set forth above. Recitations such as “a first axis” on line 6 of claim 7 render the claims indefinite because it is unclear if the applicant is referring to the first axis set forth above or is attempting to set forth another first axis in addition to the one set forth above. Recitations such as “a second axis” on line 2 of claim 10 render the claims indefinite because it is unclear if the applicant is referring to the second axis set forth above or is attempting to set forth another second axis in addition to the one set forth above. Recitations such as “a second axis” on line 2 of claim 19 render the claims indefinite because it is unclear if the applicant is referring to the second axis set forth above or is attempting to set forth another second axis in addition to the one set forth above. Recitations such as “a first axis” on lines 5-6 of claim 20 render the claims indefinite because it is unclear if the applicant is referring to the first axis set forth above or is attempting to set forth another first axis in addition to the one set forth above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4-7, 11-14 and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CN 113107294. With respect to claim 1, CN 113107294 discloses a hinge assembly 100 (fig. 9) of a scissor door, the hinge assembly comprising: a mounting base 1 (fig. 2) provided with a first mounting portion 12 (fig. 3) and a second mounting portion 13 (fig. 3) spaced apart from each other; a connection base 2 provided with a first connection portion (labeled below) and a second connection portion (labeled below) spaced apart from each other; a first rotation member 4 (fig. 2) rotatably connected to the first mounting portion 12 and provided with a first hinge portion (labeled below); a second rotation member 6 (figs. 2 and 5) rotatably connected to the second mounting portion 13 and provided with a second hinge portion 62 (fig. 5), the second hinge portion 62 being rotatably connected to the second connection portion, and a first hinge arm 3 having a first end (labeled below) and a second end (labeled below), the first end being rotatably connected to the first hinge portion, and the second end being rotatably connected to the first connection portion, wherein: the first rotation member 4 is rotatable relative to the first mounting portion 12 about a first axis; and the first hinge arm 3 is rotatable relative to the first rotation member 4 about a second axis, the first axis intersecting with the second axis (note that the first and second axes are perpendicular to one another) at a first intersection, wherein the hinge assembly further comprises a second hinge arm 5 having a third end (labeled below) and a fourth end (labeled below), the third end being rotatably connected to the second hinge portion 62, and the fourth end being rotatably connected to the second connection portion. With respect to claim 4, the second rotation member 6 is rotatable about a third axis (labeled below) relative to the second mounting portion 13; and the second hinge arm 5 is rotatable about a fourth axis (labeled below) relative to the second rotation member 6, the first axis, the third axis, and the fourth axis intersecting at a second intersection (labeled below), and the first intersection being non-coincident with the second intersection. With respect to claim 5, the second hinge arm 5 is rotatable about a fourth axis (labeled below) relative to the second rotation member 6; and the second hinge arm 5 is rotatable about a fifth axis (labeled below) relative to the second connection portion, the fourth axis intersecting with the fifth axis at a third intersection (labeled below). With respect to claim 6, the first hinge arm 3 is rotatable about a second axis (labeled below) relative to the first rotation member 4; the second hinge arm 5 is rotatable about a fifth axis (labeled below) relative to the second connection portion; and the first hinge arm 3 is rotatable about a sixth axis (labeled below) relative to the first connection portion, the second axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis being parallel to each other as shown below. With respect to claim 7, the mounting base 1 is arranged vertically as shown in figure 2; the second mounting portion 13 is located below the first mounting portion 12 and faces towards the connection base 2; the first rotation member 4 is rotatably disposed on the first mounting portion 12 about a first axis (labeled below), the first axis extending vertically; and the second rotation member 6 is rotatably disposed on the second mounting portion 13 about a third axis (labeled below), the third axis extending obliquely downwards from front to rear in a front-rear direction of the scissor door as illustrated below. With respect to claim 11, the second rotation member 6 is rotatable between a first position, as shown in figure 1, and a second position, as shown in figure 2, relative to the second mounting portion 13 about a third axis (labeled below), the third axis extending in a front-rear direction of the scissor door, wherein when the second rotation member 6 is in the first position (fig. 1), the second hinge portion 62 is located below the third axis; and wherein when the second rotation member 6 is in the second position, as shown in figure 2, the second hinge portion 62 is located above the third axis. With respect to claim 12, the second rotation member 6 comprises a first segment (labeled below) and a second segment (labeled below) that are sequentially connected, wherein: each of the first segment and the second segment extends along a straight line as shown in figure 5; the first segment is obliquely arranged relative to the second segment, an obtuse angle (labeled below) being formed between the first segment and the second segment; the first segment is connected to the second mounting portion 13; the second hinge portion 62 is formed at the second segment; and the second mounting portion 13 is located at a side of the second rotation member 6 corresponding to an interior angle of the second rotation member 6. With respect to claim 13, a support rod 7 having two ends respectively hinged to the mounting base 1 and the connection base 2 for driving the connection base 2 to move relative to the mounting base 1. With respect to claim 14, CN 113107294 further discloses a vehicle, comprising: the hinge assembly as set forth in the rejection of claim 1 above, a vehicle body 200 (fig. 9); the scissor door 300; wherein the mounting base 1 is fixed to the vehicle body 200; and wherein the connection base 2 is fixed to the scissor door 300 (fig. 9). With respect to claim 17, the second rotation member 6 is rotatable about a third axis (labeled below) relative to the second mounting portion 13; and the second hinge arm 5 is rotatable about a fourth axis (labeled below) relative to the second rotation member 6, the first axis, the third axis, and the fourth axis intersecting at a second intersection (labeled below), and the first intersection being non-coincident with the second intersection. With respect to claim 18, the second hinge arm 5 is rotatable about a fourth axis (labeled below) relative to the second rotation member 6; and the second hinge arm 5 is rotatable about a fifth axis (labeled below) relative to the second connection portion, the fourth axis intersecting with the fifth axis at a third intersection (labeled below). With respect to claim 19, the first hinge arm 3 is rotatable about a second axis (labeled below) relative to the first rotation member 4; the second hinge arm 5 is rotatable about a fifth axis (labeled below) relative to the second connection portion; and the first hinge arm 3 is rotatable about a sixth axis (labeled below) relative to the first connection portion, the second axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis being parallel to each other as shown in figure 1 below. With respect claim 20, the mounting base 1 is arranged vertically as shown in figure 1; the second mounting portion 13 is located below the first mounting portion 12, as shown in figure 3, and faces towards the connection base 2; the first rotation member 4 is rotatably disposed on the first mounting portion 12 about a first axis (labeled below), the first axis extending vertically; and the second rotation member 6 is rotatably disposed on the second mounting portion 13 about a third axis (labeled below), the third axis extending obliquely downwards from front to rear in a front-rear direction of the scissor door 300 as shown in annotated figure 1 below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 8 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 113107294 as applied to claims 1, 4-7, 11-14 and 17-20 above, and further in view of CN 114233126. With respect to claim 8, CN 114233126 discloses a connection base 20 comprising a first connection plate (labeled below) and a second connection plate (labeled below); the first connection plate extends in a left-right direction and is connected to a scissor door 300 (fig. 16); the second connection plate is connected to a front side surface of the first connection plate and extends forward in a front-rear direction of the scissor door 300; and a first connection portion (labeled below) and the second connection portion (labeled below) are both disposed on the second connection plate. With respect to claim 9, CN 114233126 further discloses that the second connection plate which is arranged vertically and extends in a front-rear direction of the scissor door 300; the second connection plate comprises a first plate segment (labeled below), a bent segment (labeled below), and a second plate segment (labeled below) that are sequentially connected from top to bottom, the first plate segment and the second plate segment being offset from each other in the left-right direction as shown in figure 1, and the first plate segment being connected to the second plate segment by the bent segment as shown in figure 1. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide CN 113107294 with a second connection plate, as taught by CN 114233126, with a reasonable expectation of success to increase the strength of the connection base. It should be noted that the second end of the first hinge arm 3 would be connected to the first plate segment and located at a side of the first plate segment facing towards the bent segment in the left-right direction, and the fourth end of the second hinge arm 5 would be connected to the second plate segment and located at a side of the second plate segment facing towards the bent segment in the left-right direction. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 113107294 as applied to claims 1, 4-7, 11-14 and 17-20 above, and further in view of CN 114059874. CN 113107294 disclose that the first hinge arm 3 is rotatably connected to the first rotation member 4 about a second axis (labeled below). CN 113107294 is silent concerning the first end and the second end of the first hinge arm being offset from each other in a direction parallel to the second axis; and the first hinge arm further comprises a connection segment, wherein the connection segment has an end connected to the first end and another end extending obliquely towards the second end. However, CN 114059874 discloses a first hinge arm 30 (fig. 1) comprising a first end (labeled below) and a second end (labeled below) being offset from each other in a direction parallel to a second axis 65 (fig. 1); and the first hinge arm further comprises a connection segment (labeled below), wherein the connection segment has an end connected to the first end and another end extending obliquely towards the second end. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide the first hinge arm of CN 113107294 with offset ends and a connection segment, as taught by CN 114059874, with a reasonable expectation of success to position the connection base further away from a center of the vehicle so as to accommodate doors with larger thicknesses. PNG media_image1.png 1636 1100 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 1640 1096 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 1636 1102 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 1638 1094 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 1660 1116 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 1660 1118 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 1658 1118 media_image7.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed April 13, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. With respect to the applicant’s argument that CN 113107294 fails to disclose a second hinge arm having a third end being rotatably connected to the second hinge portion, and a fourth end being rotatably connected to the second connection portion, the examiner respectfully disagrees. As shown in figures 1, 5 and 6, the second hinge arm 5 has multiple ends (labeled below) one of which is a third end (labeled above) which is directly rotatably connected to the second hinge portion 62. The fourth end (labeled above) of the second hinge arm 5 is also rotatably connected to the second connection portion (labeled above as element 21 in figure 7 and figures 1 and 2). This interpretation of the ends of the second hinge arm 5 is analogous to the ends of a trident fork. There is one end at one side of the fork and three ends at the opposite side of the fork. PNG media_image8.png 1656 1116 media_image8.png Greyscale Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY J STRIMBU whose telephone number is (571)272-6836. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00-4:30 Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Cahn can be reached at 571-270-5616. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY J STRIMBU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3634
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 15, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Apr 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679180
VEHICLE SASH DOOR STRUCTURE
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674332
TRAPDOOR-INSERT ASSEMBLY COMPRISING AN INSERT HOOKED TO THE TRAPDOOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12654524
VEHICLE DOOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF VEHICLE DOOR
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12644326
LEADING CLOSING EDGE SAFETY ARRANGEMENT FOR A DOOR DEVICE AND DOOR DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12631062
WASHING MACHINE
1y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+80.4%)
3y 2m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 926 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month