Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/021,467

SOLAR POWER DYNAMIC GLASS FOR HEATING AND COOLING BUILDINGS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 15, 2025
Priority
Feb 16, 2017 — provisional 62/459,991 +5 more
Examiner
DEBERADINIS, ROBERT L
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
View Operating Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
837 granted / 978 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
991
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§102
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 978 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2,3,5-8,10,11is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PODBELSKI et al. 20120194895 in view of MAIMON et al. AU2012100413A4 CLAIM 2 PODBELSKI et al. et al. discloses CLAIM 2 (New) A method for controlling a tint state of at least one of a plurality of optically switchable windows (Fig. 1), the method comprising: measuring solar irradiance (Fig. 3) (table 1) for the at least one of the plurality of optically switchable windows. PODBELSKI et al. does not disclose a photovoltaic spandrel glass comprising at least one photovoltaic array integrated with spandrels titles and/or spandrel glass. MAIMON et al. discloses CLAIM 1. A solar window glass panel which is formed by at least one sheet of glass, the solar window glass panel includes: a solar panel formed using thin-film amorphous silicon which is 5 carried by the at least one sheet of glass; the solar panel is configured, by providing varying tinting through adjustment of the amount of thin-film amorphous silicon present in the solar panel, to adjust transmittance of the solar panel in which a selected amount of visible light transmitted and total solar energy transmitted is 10 allowed to pass through the solar panel; wherein the transmittance is linked to the power output of the solar panel so that an increase in transmittance results in a decrease of power output. 15 Spandrel is well known to be the area around a glass façade on a building, spandrel glass is hiding the structural members that might be behind the spandrel glass. The spandrel glass, glass used to cover this area, has a tinted property that limits (transmittance) the visual site of what is behind the spandrel glass. MAIMON et al. teaches the transmittance is linked to the power output of the solar panel so that an increase in transmittance results in a decrease of power output. 15 It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to incorporate a photovoltaic array (solar panel) into a tinted glass to form the photovoltaic spandrel glass comprising at least one photovoltaic array integrated with spandrels titles and/or spandrel glass to take advantage of the increased power output of the solar panel due to the decreased transmittance of the spandrel glass. CLAIM 3 PODBELSKI et al. in view of MAIMON et al. disclose CLAIM 3 (New) The method of claim 2, wherein measuring the solar irradiance is based at least in part on real-time photovoltaic power generation data (PODBELSKI et al. Fig. 3). CLAIMS 5,10 PODBELSKI et al. in view of MAIMON et al. disclose CLAIM 5 (New) The method of claim 2. The references do not disclose forecasting weather based at least in part on the measured solar irradiance. It is obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art of forecasting weather would know that days with high solar irradiance are sunny days and a record of past sunny days could help in predicting future periods of the same season, to forecast the weather. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to forecasting weather based at least in part on the measured solar irradiance. CLAIMS 6,11 PODBELSKI et al. in view of MAIMON et al. disclose CLAIM 6 (New) The method of claim 2. The references do not disclose modeling climate based at least in part on the measured solar irradiance. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to model climate based on solar irradiance since it is well known in the art that modeling past weather predicts future weather and high solar irradiance is an indication of sunny weather, therefore modeling past high solar irradiance periods of weather provides information to forecast future weather periods. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to modeling climate based at least in part on the measured solar irradiance. CLAIM 7 PODBELSKI et al. et al. discloses 7 (New) A system for controlling a tint state of at least one of a plurality of optically switchable windows (Fig. 1), the system comprising: measuring solar irradiance (Fig. 3) (table 1) for the at least one of the plurality of optically switchable windows. PODBELSKI et al. does not disclose a photovoltaic spandrel glass comprising at least one photovoltaic array integrated with spandrels titles and/or spandrel glass. MAIMON et al. discloses CLAIM 1. A solar window glass panel which is formed by at least one sheet of glass, the solar window glass panel includes: a solar panel formed using thin-film amorphous silicon which is 5 carried by the at least one sheet of glass; the solar panel is configured, by providing varying tinting through adjustment of the amount of thin-film amorphous silicon present in the solar panel, to adjust transmittance of the solar panel in which a selected amount of visible light transmitted and total solar energy transmitted is 10 allowed to pass through the solar panel; wherein the transmittance is linked to the power output of the solar panel so that an increase in transmittance results in a decrease of power output. 15 Spandrel is well known to be the area around a glass façade on a building, spandrel glass is hiding the structural members that might be behind the spandrel glass. The spandrel glass, glass used to cover this area, has a tinted property that limits (transmittance) the visual site of what is behind the spandrel glass. The references do not disclose a photovoltaic monitor configured to gather solar irradiance data from the photovoltaic array; PODBELSKI et al. discloses measuring available energy from PV module (Fig. 3). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to gather solar irradiance data from the energy measurement (energy from the PV is a measurement of irradiance on the PV) to form a data base for modeling the weather since it is well known in the art that modeling past weather predicts future weather and high solar irradiance is an indication of sunny weather, therefore modeling past high solar irradiance periods of weather provides information to forecast future weather periods. CLAIM 8 PODBELSKI et al. in view of MAIMON et al. disclose CLAIM 8 (New) The system of claim 7. PODBELSKI et al. discloses wherein the solar irradiance data is based at least in part on real-time photovoltaic power generation data (Fig. 3). Claim(s) 4,9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PODBELSKI et al. 20120194895 in view of MAIMON et al. AU2012100413A4 in further view of BROEN et al. US20160154290 CLAIM 4 PODBELSKI et al. in view of MAIMON et al. disclose CLAIM 4 (New) The method of claim 2. The references do not disclose further determining incident solar heat gain based at least in part on the measured solar irradiance. BROWN et al. discloses [0195] Thermoelectric generators may be used in combination with other power sources. For instance, thermoelectric generators may be provided in combination with batteries, PV panels, piezoelectric generators, fuel cells, etc. In a particular embodiment, a window includes both a PV panel and a thermoelectric generator (with or without other power options such as batteries, etc.). Because solar panels typically use only the high frequency part of the solar radiation, they are especially useful in combination with a thermoelectric generator. Low frequency heat energy, which would otherwise be lost where a PV panel is used in isolation, is instead captured by the thermoelectric generator and converted to electricity. Such a combined power scheme can help optimize energy efficiency. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to determine incident solar heat gain based on solar irradiance because the heat gain is the low frequency heat energy dependent on the solar radiation and knowing the solar radiation the heat energy load can be predicted. CLAIM 9 PODBELSKI et al. in view of MAIMON et al. disclose CLAIM 9 (New) The system of claim 7. The references do not disclose wherein the one or more window controllers are configured to: determine incident solar heat gain based at least in part on the solar irradiance data. BROWN et al. discloses [0195] Thermoelectric generators may be used in combination with other power sources. For instance, thermoelectric generators may be provided in combination with batteries, PV panels, piezoelectric generators, fuel cells, etc. In a particular embodiment, a window includes both a PV panel and a thermoelectric generator (with or without other power options such as batteries, etc.). Because solar panels typically use only the high frequency part of the solar radiation, they are especially useful in combination with a thermoelectric generator. Low frequency heat energy, which would otherwise be lost where a PV panel is used in isolation, is instead captured by the thermoelectric generator and converted to electricity. Such a combined power scheme can help optimize energy efficiency. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to determine incident solar heat gain based on solar irradiance because the heat gain is the low frequency heat energy dependent on the solar radiation and knowing the solar radiation the heat energy load can be predicted. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT L DEBERADINIS whose telephone number is (571)272-2049. The examiner can normally be reached 9 am to 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barnie Rexford can be reached at 571 272 2391. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. May 15, 2026 /ROBERT L DEBERADINIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 15, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 04, 2026
Response Filed
May 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684635
POWER RECEIVING APPARATUS, POWER TRANSMISSION APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683436
FRIENDLY METAL LOSS ESTIMATION FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER
1y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676353
ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM AND ENERGY STORAGE POWER STATION
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671271
MAGNETIC SUBSTANCE DISPLACEMENT CONTROL MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671263
AUTONOMOUS BATTERY LIFESPAN BOOSTER
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.8%)
2y 3m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 978 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month