Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/021,773

CONVERTING USER INPUTS ON A LAWNMOWER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 15, 2025
Priority
Jan 16, 2024 — provisional 63/621,283
Examiner
BROWN, CLAUDE J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Techtronic Power Tools Technology Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
421 granted / 528 resolved
+19.7% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
538
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 528 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Introduction Claims 1-20 are currently pending in this application and are subject to examination herein. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/22/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, 6 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2022/0151141 to Nebel et al. (hereinafter Nebel) in view of U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2018/0002893 to Heinzmann et al. (hereinafter Heinzmann). Regarding claim 1, Nebel discloses a riding lawnmower (electric mower 10) (Figs. 1-3, 5; Paras. [0026]-[0033], [0035], [0038]-[0039], [0043]-[0045]) comprising: a frame (frame 12) (Fig. 1; Paras. [0026], [0028], [0030]); a seat (operator seat 16) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0026], [0028], [0035], [0039], [0041]-[0042], [0044]) supported by the frame; a cutting implement (implement 18) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0026], [0028], [0031], [0043]) supported by the frame (frame 12) (Fig. 1; Paras. [0026], [0028], [0030]), the cutting implement (implement 18) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0026], [0028], [0031], [0043]) driven by a cutting implement motor (left blade motor 44, right blade motor 46 and/or implement motor 114) (Figs. 3, 6; Paras. [0031], [0033], [0036], [0039], [0041], [0043]-[0044]); a wheel (left drive wheel 22 and/or right drive 24) (Figs. 1-3, 5; Paras. [0026], [0029]-[0030]) rotatably driven by a wheel motor (left traction motor 26 and/or right traction motor 28) (Figs. 5-6; Paras. [0026], [0033], [0035], [0041]-[0042]); and a controller (left traction controller 82 and/or right traction controller 84) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0033], [0035], [0037], [0040]-[0042], [0045]) in electrical communication with the wheel motor (left traction motor 26 and/or right traction motor 28) (Figs. 5-6; Paras. [0026], [0033], [0035], [0041]-[0042]) to control operation of the wheel motor (left traction motor 26 and/or right traction motor 28) (Figs. 5-6; Paras. [0026], [0033], [0035], [0041]-[0042]). However, Nebel does not expressly disclose: a wiring harness defining a user input connector, wherein the wiring harness is in electrical communication with the controller; a user input movable in at least one direction, wherein the user input receives input from a user to affect steering control of the lawnmower, wherein the user input receives input from a user to affect steering control wherein the user input is swappable between at least two different types of user inputs, and wherein the controller is configured to self-configure between the at least two different types of user inputs. Nevertheless, Heinzmann in an analogous art of controls for controlling a work machine teaches: a wiring harness defining a user input connector (e.g., standardized electrical connection for attachment to a work machine via a standardized base, such as electrical connection 92 and associated wiring to base electronic controller 94 and/or CAN bus wiring harness) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0038], [0042]), wherein the wiring harness (e.g., standardized electrical connection for attachment to a work machine via a standardized base, such as electrical connection 92 and associated wiring to base electronic controller 94 and/or CAN bus wiring harness) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0038], [0042]) is in electrical communication with the controller (e.g., base electrical controller 94 and/or CAN bus) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0037]-[0038]); a user input (joystick 40, 68, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) movable in at least one direction (joystick body 42 movable in at least one direction, button-style input devices 59 movable in at least one direction and/or variable wheel input device 61 movable in at least one direction) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]), wherein the user input (joystick 40, 68, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) receives input from a user to affect steering control (Paras. [0004], [0023]-[0024]), wherein the user input receives input (joystick 40, 68, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) from a user to affect steering control (Paras. [0004], [0023]-[0024]) wherein the user input (joystick 40, 68, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) is swappable (Paras. [0008], [0041]) between at least two different types of user inputs (compare Fig. 4 having joystick 40 with four button-style input devices 59 and one continuously variable wheel input device 61 and Fig. 5 having joystick 68 with five button-style input devices 59 and one variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-5; Para. [0028]), and wherein the controller is configured to self-configure between the at least two different types of user inputs (Abstract; Paras. [0007], [0009], [0024], [0026],[0030], [0039]-[0040], [0042]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the riding lawnmower disclosed in Nebel with the interchangeable user inputs taught in Heinzmann with a reasonable expectation of success in order to provide interchangeable controllers, each having different configurations optimized to the operator and/or the particular operating parameters and/or requirements of the selected work tool (e.g., riding lawnmower), as taught by Heinzmann (Abstract; Paras. [0006], [0024], [0042]) and to allow for easy replacement of a broken user input device (e.g., joystick). Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the riding lawnmower disclosed in Nebel with the interchangeable user inputs taught in Heinzmann with a reasonable expectation of success, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to combine prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is obvious. KSR International Co. v Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 416, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007). Regarding claim 4, Nebel in view of Heinzmann teaches the riding lawnmower of claim 1 (see above). Furthermore, Heinzmann teaches that the at least two different types (compare Fig. 4 having joystick with four button-style input devices 59 and one continuously variable wheel input device 61 and Fig. 5 having joystick with five button-style input devices 59 and one variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-5; Para. [0028]) of user inputs (joystick 40, 68, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) are installed on the lawnmower through different pathways (e.g., left hand side of operator with its associated pathway and right hand side of the operator location with its associated pathway) (Paras. [0024], [0030]). Regarding claim 6, Nebel in view of Heinzmann teaches the riding lawnmower of claim 1 (see above). Furthermore, Heinzmann teaches an opening (opening in top of threaded nut/toolless securing collar 56) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0027], [0033], [0039]) through which the user input (joystick 40, 68, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) is movable to install and remove the user input (joystick 40, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]), and wherein the opening (opening in top of threaded nut/toolless securing collar 56) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0027], [0033], [0039]) is covered by a removable faring (threaded nut/toolless securing collar 56) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0027], [0033], [0039]). Regarding claim 8, Nebel in view of Heinzmann teaches the riding lawnmower of claim 1 (see above). Furthermore, Heinzmann teaches that the controller is configured to self-configure based on a connector type of the user input (compare Fig. 4 having joystick 40 with four button-style input devices 59 and one continuously variable wheel input device 61 and Fig. 5 having joystick 68 with five button-style input devices 59 and one variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-5; Para. [0028]) received at the user input connector (e.g., standardized electrical connection for attachment to a work machine via a standardized base, such as electrical connection 92 and associated wiring to base electronic controller 94 and/or CAN bus wiring harness) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0038], [0042]). Claim(s) 9-10, 15 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Heinzmann in view of Nebel. Regarding claim 9, Heinzmann discloses a method of retrofitting a work device between a plurality of different user inputs (compare Fig. 4 having joystick 40 with four button-style input devices 59 and one continuously variable wheel input device 61 and Fig. 5 having joystick 68 with five button-style input devices 59 and one variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-5; Para. [0028]), the method comprising: removing a cover (threaded nut/toolless securing collar 56) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0027], [0033], [0039]) of the work device to expose an opening (opening in top of threaded nut/toolless securing collar 56) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0027], [0033], [0039]) such that an existing user input (first joystick 40, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) currently coupled to the work device is accessible through the opening (opening in top of threaded nut/toolless securing collar 56) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0027], [0033], [0039]); physically uncoupling (e.g., via uncoupling mechanical connection 46 of base 44 from joystick 40) (Fig. 6; Para. [0039]) the existing user input (first joystick 40, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) from the work device; electrically uncoupling a connector (first electrical connection 90) (Figs. 6-7; Paras. [0037]-[0038], [0040]-[0041]) of the existing user input (first joystick 40, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) from a user input connector (e.g., standardized electrical connection for attachment to a work machine via a standardized base, such as electrical connection 92 and associated wiring to base electronic controller 94 and/or CAN bus wiring harness) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0038], [0042]) associated with a wire harness of the work device (e.g., standardized electrical connection for attachment to a work machine via a standardized base, such as electrical connection 92 and associated wiring to base electronic controller 94 and/or CAN bus wiring harness) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0038], [0042]); physically coupling (e.g., via coupling mechanical connection 46 of base 44 to joystick 40) (Fig. 6; Para. [0039]) a new user input (second joystick 68, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) to the work device; and electrically coupling the new user input (second joystick 68, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) to the work device by connecting a connector (first electrical connection 90) (Figs. 6-7; Paras. [0037]-[0038], [0040]-[0041]) of the new user input (second joystick 68, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) to the user input connector (e.g., standardized electrical connection for attachment to a work machine via a standardized base, such as electrical connection 92 and associated wiring to base electronic controller 94 and/or CAN bus wiring harness) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0038], [0042]). However, Heinzmann does not expressly disclose that the work device is a lawnmower. Nevertheless, Nebel teaches a work device that is a lawnmower that uses joysticks, wheels, buttons, knobs or handles to send signals to a controller (left traction controller 82 and/or right traction controller 84) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0033], [0035], [0037], [0040]-[0042], [0045]) to direct any one of the systems therein (Para. [0024]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the interchangeable user inputs taught in Heinzmann with the lawnmower taught in Nebel with a reasonable expectation of success in order to allow for easy replacement of a broken user input device (e.g., joystick) on the lawnmower. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the interchangeable user inputs taught in Heinzmann with the lawnmower taught in Nebel with a reasonable expectation of success, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to combine prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is obvious. KSR International Co. v Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 416, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007). Regarding claim 10, Heinzmann in view of Nebel teaches the method of claim 9 (see above). Furthermore, Heinzmann discloses a method wherein a controller (left traction controller 82 and/or right traction controller 84) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0033], [0035], [0037], [0040]-[0042], [0045]) is configured to self-configure (Abstract; Paras. [0007], [0009], [0024], [0026],[0030], [0039]-[0040], [0042]) from a configuration associated with the existing user input (first joystick 40, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61, such as the one depicted in Fig. 4) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) to a configuration associated with the new user input (second joystick 68, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61, such as the one depicted in Fig. 5) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) in response to electrically coupling the new user input (second joystick 68, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61, such as the one depicted in Fig. 5) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) to the work device. Regarding claim 15, Heinzmann discloses a plurality of swappable user inputs (compare Fig. 4 having joystick 40 with four button-style input devices 59 and one continuously variable wheel input device 61 and Fig. 5 having joystick 68 with five button-style input devices 59 and one variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-5; Para. [0028]) each configured to be separately coupled to a work device to affect steering control (Paras. [0004], [0023]-[0024]) of the work device, wherein the plurality of swappable user inputs (compare Fig. 4 having joystick 40 with four button-style input devices 59 and one continuously variable wheel input device 61 and Fig. 5 having joystick 68 with five button-style input devices 59 and one variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-5; Para. [0028]) comprises at least two different types of user inputs (compare Fig. 4 having joystick 40 with four button-style input devices 59 and one continuously variable wheel input device 61 and Fig. 5 having joystick 68 with five button-style input devices 59 and one variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-5; Para. [0028]), and wherein each of the plurality of swappable user inputs (compare Fig. 4 having joystick 40 with four button-style input devices 59 and one continuously variable wheel input device 61 and Fig. 5 having joystick 68 with five button-style input devices 59 and one variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-5; Para. [0028]) comprises: an engagement feature (e.g., mechanical connection 46 of base 44 from joystick 40) (Fig. 6; Para. [0039]) to removably secure the user input (joystick 40, 68, button-style input devices 59 and/or variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) to the work device; a control implement (joystick body 42, 70 movable in at least one direction, button-style input devices 59 movable in at least one direction and/or variable wheel input device 61 movable in at least one direction) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) which receives an input from a user riding on the work device; a sensor (e.g., sensor in switches, linear sliders, toggles, dials, rotary knobs, thumbwheels, triggers, or other manually operated actuators, or any suitable combination of different types of control input devices) (Figs. 4-6; Paras. [0026], [0031]) that detects a state of the control implement (joystick body 42, 70 movable in at least one direction, button-style input devices 59 movable in at least one direction and/or variable wheel input device 61 movable in at least one direction) (Figs. 4-7; Paras. [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]); and a connector (first electrical connection 90) (Figs. 6-7; Paras. [0037]-[0038], [0040]-[0041]) in electrical communication with the sensor (e.g., sensor in switches, linear sliders, toggles, dials, rotary knobs, thumbwheels, triggers, or other manually operated actuators, or any suitable combination of different types of control input devices) (Figs. 4-6; Paras. [0026], [0031]) to transmit detected information from the sensor (e.g., sensor in switches, linear sliders, toggles, dials, rotary knobs, thumbwheels, triggers, or other manually operated actuators, or any suitable combination of different types of control input devices) (Figs. 4-6; Paras. [0026], [0031]) to a wiring harness of the work device (e.g., standardized electrical connection for attachment to a work machine via a standardized base, such as electrical connection 92 and associated wiring to base electronic controller 94 and/or CAN bus wiring harness) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0038], [0042]), wherein the connector (first electrical connection 90) (Figs. 6-7; Paras. [0037]-[0038], [0040]-[0041]) is configured to be removably installable at the wiring harness (e.g., standardized electrical connection for attachment to a work machine via a standardized base, such as electrical connection 92 and associated wiring to base electronic controller 94 and/or CAN bus wiring harness) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0038], [0042]), and wherein each of the different types of user inputs (compare Fig. 4 having joystick 40 with four button-style input devices 59 and one continuously variable wheel input device 61 and Fig. 5 having joystick 68 with five button-style input devices 59 and one variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-5; Para. [0028]) has a different type of connector (first electrical connection 90) (Figs. 6-7; Paras. [0037]-[0038], [0040]-[0041]) such that a controller (e.g., base electrical controller 94 and/or CAN bus) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0037]-[0038]) of the work device is able to self-configure (Abstract; Paras. [0007], [0009], [0024], [0026],[0030], [0039]-[0040], [0042]) to control the work device based on the connector type installed at the wiring harness (e.g., standardized electrical connection for attachment to a work machine via a standardized base, such as electrical connection 92 and associated wiring to base electronic controller 94 and/or CAN bus wiring harness) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0038], [0042]). However, Heinzmann does not expressly disclose that the work device is a lawnmower. Nevertheless, Nebel teaches a work device that is a lawnmower that uses joysticks, wheels, buttons, knobs or handles to send signals to a controller (left traction controller 82 and/or right traction controller 84) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0033], [0035], [0037], [0040]-[0042], [0045]) to direct any one of the systems therein (Para. [0024]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the interchangeable user inputs taught in Heinzmann with the lawnmower taught in Nebel with a reasonable expectation of success in order to allow for easy replacement of a broken user input device (e.g., joystick) on the lawnmower. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the interchangeable user inputs taught in Heinzmann with the lawnmower taught in Nebel with a reasonable expectation of success, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to combine prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is obvious. KSR International Co. v Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 416, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007). Regarding claim 17, Heinzmann in view of Nebel teaches the plurality of swappable user inputs of claim 15 (see above). Furthermore, Heinzman teaches that the connectors (first electrical connection 90) (Figs. 6-7; Paras. [0037]-[0038], [0040]-[0041]) of each of the different types of user inputs is compatible with a single user input connector (e.g., standardized electrical connection for attachment to a work machine via a standardized base, such as electrical connection 92 and associated wiring to base electronic controller 94 and/or CAN bus wiring harness) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0038], [0042]) associated with the wiring harness (e.g., standardized electrical connection for attachment to a work machine via a standardized base, such as electrical connection 92 and associated wiring to base electronic controller 94 and/or CAN bus wiring harness) (Fig. 6; Paras. [0038], [0042]). Regarding claim 18, Heinzmann in view of Nebel teaches the plurality of swappable user inputs of claim 15 (see above). Furthermore, Heinzman teaches that at least one of the swappable user inputs comprises a single control implement (e.g., handle body 42) (Fig. 4, 6-7; Paras. [0024], [0026]-[0028], [0030], [0036]-[0037], [0039], [0041]) (for example, “If two joysticks are employed, the functions of each may be distributed between the two joysticks according to any suitable arrangement . . . one joystick . . . may be configured to operate the basic functions of the work machine, such as locomotion of the machine itself . . . .” (Para. [0024])), wherein at least one of the swappable user inputs (compare Fig. 4 having joystick 40 with four button-style input devices 59 and one continuously variable wheel input device 61 and Fig. 5 having joystick 68 with five button-style input devices 59 and one variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-5; Para. [0028]) comprises a plurality of control implements (compare Fig. 4 having joystick 40 with four button-style input devices 59 and one continuously variable wheel input device 61 and Fig. 5 having joystick 68 with five button-style input devices 59 and one variable wheel input device 61) (Figs. 4-5; Para. [0028]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3, 5, 7, 11-14, 16 and 19-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Pat. No. 6,341,821 to Rousseau (cited by Applicant in IDS filed on 10/22/2025) relates to an ergonomic armrest and joystick assembly that allows swapping between left and right sides. U.S. Pat. No. 4,702,520 to Whisler et al. relates to an adjustable armrest with integral vehicle controls. U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,090 to Ruhter et al. relates to an auxiliary input arrangement for a construction vehicle. U.S. Pat. No. 5,326,063 to Stevens relates to a swing-away joystick assembly for an armrest. European Pat. Pub. No. EP 2 832 583 A2 to Dubiez (cited by Applicant in IDS filed on 10/22/2025) relates to a joystick controller that is releasably secured to an armrest. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CLAUDE J BROWN whose telephone number is (571)270-5924. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph M. Rocca can be reached at (571) 272-8971. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CLAUDE J BROWN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 15, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745698
Self-Driving Work Apparatus
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745702
Residue Spread Monitoring
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12733577
GARDEN TOOL WITH TOOLLESSLY INTERCHANGEABLE WHEEL
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727530
ENVIRONMENT MAINTENANCE SYSTEM AND WEEDER ROBOT
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727546
Adjustment and Release Unit for a Concave of a Threshing System of a Combine Harvester
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+17.2%)
2y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 528 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month