Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/022,002

TECHNIQUES FOR ANONYMIZED SEARCHING OF MEDICAL PROVIDERS

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jan 15, 2025
Priority
Sep 29, 2017 — provisional 62/566,051 +7 more
Examiner
LEROUX, ETIENNE PIERRE
Art Unit
2161
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
988 granted / 1116 resolved
+33.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
1131
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
§103
52.9%
+12.9% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1116 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/28/2026 has been entered. Claim Status Claims 2, 4-9, 11-16 and 18-24 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 2, 4-9, 11-16 and 18-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 2 recites: wherein the provider subscription server is operated by a first entity and the first electronic health record system is operated by a second entity that is distinct from the first entity, wherein the first persistent data connection excludes a connection with the provider subscription server and In Remarks submitted 8/28/2026, applicant fails to point to the specification for support for above amendment to claim 2. Particularly for: provider subscription server connection sequence first electron health record system is operated by a second entity that is distinct from the first entity wherein the first persistent data connection excludes a connection with the provider subscription server Claim 22 recites: wherein the first persistent data connection enables the application to download the first health record data from the first electronic health record system and receive the first updates to the first health record data without sharing the first health record data or the first updates with the provider subscription server. Claim 23 and 24 recites similar language. Independent claims 9 and 16 recite similar language and are rejected. Dependent claims 4-8, 11-15 and 18-24 are rejected for at least being dependent from a rejected based claim. Specification The specification is objected to as failing to provide proper antecedent basis for the claimed subject matter. See 37 CFR 1.75(d)(1) and MPEP § 608.01(o). Correction of the following is required: Claim 2 recites "establishing a first persistent data connection between the application of the user device and a first health record system of the first provider." Claim 2 recites "second user input received within the application." Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lash (US 2005/0010446) in view of Marshall (US 2008/0133273) Examiner Notes: Hereafter, above references will be entered combination A. responsive to a first user input, providing, for presentation within an application at a user device, a first user interface view comprising a first user interface element for connecting the application with a plurality of electronic health record systems associated with a plurality of providers to enable downloading of health record data of the user from the plurality of electronic health record systems Lash [abstract] End-user software for monitoring health care benefits and maintaining individual personal health histories is disclosed. The software provides the ability for a user to monitor health care services delivered by a plurality of different health care providers, such as doctors, clinics, dentists, pharmacies, etc. under a plurality of different health benefit plans to a plurality of different individuals, such as members of an immediate or extended family. Specific medical events are logged and tracked, and payment information associated with the events can be reconciled, kept open and/or marked for follow-up action. Various planning tools are available to assist the user in making health care decisions, such as which plan to choose and when to make discretionary purchases of health care related goods and services. The software is able to download information from health care providers, health benefit plans, etc. Lash [0075] It is anticipated that health care providers will make medical history information available online to their patients for secure downloading. Such information may include text information, e.g., a medical specialist's report, and image information, e.g., a set of x-rays. It is foreseeable that such information will be made available in standardized formats. For example, text information may be made available in XML format (including its common derivatives, such as RTF and HTML), and image information may be made available in any standard digital image format including, for example, JPEG or TIFF format. determining a set of providers that provide medical care, wherein individual providers of the set of providers are associated with individual electronic health record systems; Lash discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose above limitation. However, Marshall discloses: Marshall [0028] The described embodiment, a medical information system, allows users to control their medical information and to share their medical information across disparate health care provider systems. The user's medical information is gathered into personal health records. Medical information can be exchanged over the Internet through an interface. The exchange can involve uploading information from the health provider's system to the personal health records, or can involve downloading information from the personal health records to the health care provider's system. Uploading and downloading is facilitated by a health record access ID. The user may control uploading and downloading by user selected health care professionals or providers. The downloading permits a user to provide a new health care provider, and specifically a health care professional, with relevant medical information. The exchange can reach across disparate systems by converting medical information from one standard or format used by a health care provider to one used to store personal health records. Further, the medical information system facilitates exchange of both clinical data and secure messages from a user to a selected health care professional, and vice versa. In describing this medical information system an example of equipment involved in creating the system is explained, then various aspects of a personal health record are described. Finally, interfaces to the personal health record and data exchange including secure messaging are detailed. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lash to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Mardhall for the purpose of allowing user to control their medical information and to share their medical information across disparate health care provider systems providing, for presentation within the application at the user device, a second user interface view comprising a search bar for searching for a subset of providers of the set of providers Lash [0065] The opening or "home" screen of FIG. 1 presents a high level overview of the basic data that has been entered into the system. Thus, this screen presents the user with listings of individuals, providers and plans that have been entered, a listing of upcoming appointments and reminders, and expense summaries and menus for entering new information, such as new records relating to a medical event, and for searching existing records for purposes of viewing or modifying them. responsive to a second user input, received within the application, that selects a first provider of the subset of providers, initiating using a provider subscription server, a connection sequence for establishing a first persistent data connection between the application of the user device and a first electronic health record system of the first provider, wherein the provider subscription server is operated by a first entity and the first electronic health record system is operated by a second entity that is distinct from the first entity, wherein the first persistent data connection excludes a connection with the provider subscription server, and wherein the first persistent data connection enables the application to download first health record data of the user from the first electronic health record system and receive first updates to the first health record data Marshall [0028] The described embodiment, a medical information system, allows users to control their medical information and to share their medical information across disparate health care provider systems. The user's medical information is gathered into personal health records. Medical information can be exchanged over the Internet through an interface. The exchange can involve uploading information from the health provider's system to the personal health records, or can involve downloading information from the personal health records to the health care Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Finkelstein (US 2017/0109570) Combination A discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose wherein the connection sequence comprises connecting to a gateway of the first electronic health record system. However, Finkelstein discloses: Finkelstein [0037] In certain preferred embodiments, the system may be configured to obtain at least an identity of a casualty that has not pre-registered by accessing images retained in a social network. In other embodiments, the invention may also provide interfaces or a gateway to the participants Electronic Health Record. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Finkelstein for the purpose of downloading health data via a gateway. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Finkelstein in view of Daub (US 2015/0088545) in view of Jung (US 9,747,579) Combination A in view of Finkelstein discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose wherein connecting to the gateway comprises receiving, via a third user interface view, user credentials associated with the first electronic health record system. However, Daub discloses: Daub [0048] Authentication database 135 may store information used in an authentication process, for example user identifiers, passwords, access privileges, user preferences, user statistics, and the like. User database 140 maintains user information and credentials for health records management system 115 users (e.g., user 105). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Daub for the purpose of storing information used in an authentication process, for example user identifiers, passwords, access privileges, user preferences, user statistics. Arguably, Daub discloses third user interface view. However, Jung discloses: Jung column 3 lines 57-62, Another embodiment provides a system. The system includes an electronic device having a plurality of user interfaces, an assistance file having a content related to the electronic device, and an assistance manager. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Jung for the purpose of providing assistance corresponding to the query through a second interface associated with the electronic device [abstract]. Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Finkelstein in view of Higgs (US 2017/0011174). Combination A in view of Finkelstein discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose downloading, to the user device, health record data from the gateway. However, Higgs discloses: Higgs claim 14, A method for transferring patient medical records comprising the steps of: inserting an initiator in a web enabling device, said initiator having a server-side application; executing a client-side application in the web enabling device's processor, accessing through the client-side application a cloud-based personal health records module, said client-side application for web access to a cloud device for connecting and communicating with said cloud-based personal health records module, and downloading a patient's patient data from said cloud-based personal health records Examiner Note: gateway = cloud-based personal health records module It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Higgs for the purpose of executing a client-side application in the web enabling device's processor and accessing through the client-side application a cloud- based personal health records module. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Finkelstein in view of Higgs in view of Sirleaf (US 2011/0071852) in view of Jung. Combination A in view of Finkelstein in view of Higgs discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose indexing the health record data according to a set of predefined categories; and providing, for presentation at the user device, a third user interface view that identifies the set of predefined categories. However, Sirleaf discloses: Sirleaf [0039] In some embodiments the first patient health record 140 is stored within the first local database using a first system identifier 150 corresponding to the first patient. For example, the database may index health records according to corresponding system identifiers, which may include an alphanumeric string representing a specific patient. In certain cases the system identifiers do not include personally identifiable information (e.g., they are random or otherwise arbitrary strings), SO that records can be accessed and retrieved without the need for personally identifiable information. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify combination A in view of Finkelstein in view of Higgs to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Sirleaf for the purpose of providing identifiers which do not include personally identifiable information (e.g., they are random or otherwise arbitrary strings), SO that records can be accessed and retrieved without the need for personally identifiable information. Arguably, Sirleaf discloses third user interface view. However, Jung discloses: Jung column 3 lines 57-62, Another embodiment provides a system. The system includes an electronic device having a plurality of user interfaces, an assistance file having a content related to the electronic device, and an assistance manager. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Jung for the purpose of providing assistance corresponding to the query through a second interface associated with the electronic device [abstract]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Jung for the purpose of providing assistance corresponding to the query through a second interface associated with the electronic device [abstract]. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Fowler (US 9,973,455) Combination A discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose wherein determining the set of providers that provide the medical care comprises determining the set of providers based on at least one of a location associated with the user device, an association between the set of providers and user information associated with the user device, or a feature of each provider of the set of providers. However, Fowler discloses: Fowler clam 9. A computer-implemented method, comprising: determining that a trigger event has been detected, the trigger event corresponding to a change in medical responsibility for a patient; evaluating aspects of the trigger event to identify a medical provider to receive (i) a notification about the trigger event and (ii) a first tailored version of a medical message corresponding to the patient; accessing an authorized medical provider list stored in a central database; evaluating the authorized medical provider list to determine that the medical provider is authorized to receive the first tailored version of the medical message corresponding to the patient, other authorized medical providers being authorized to receive other tailored versions of the medical message; determining a medical provider feature associated with the medical provider and corresponding to a medical provider parameter included in a set of messaging rules It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify combination A to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Fowler for the purpose of evaluating the authorized medical provider list to Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lash (US 2005/0010446) in view of Marshall (US 2008/0133273) Examiner Notes: Hereafter, above references will be entered combination A. responsive to a first user input, providing, for presentation within an application at a user device, a first user interface view comprising a first user interface element for connecting the application with a plurality of electronic health record systems associated with a plurality of providers to enable downloading of health record data of the user from the plurality of electronic health record systems Lash [abstract] End-user software for monitoring health care benefits and maintaining individual personal health histories is disclosed. The software provides the ability for a user to monitor health care services delivered by a plurality of different health care providers, such as doctors, clinics, dentists, pharmacies, etc. under a plurality of different health benefit plans to a plurality of different individuals, such as members of an immediate or extended family. Specific medical events are logged and tracked, and payment information associated with the events can be reconciled, kept open and/or marked for follow-up action. Various planning tools are available to assist the user in making health care decisions, such as which plan to choose and when to make discretionary purchases of health care related goods and services. The software is able to download information from health care providers, health benefit plans, etc. Lash [0075] It is anticipated that health care providers will make medical history information available online to their patients for secure downloading. Such information may include text information, e.g., a medical specialist's report, and image information, e.g., a set of x-rays. It is foreseeable that such information will be made available in standardized formats. For example, text information may be made available in XML format (including its common derivatives, such as RTF and HTML), and image information may be made available in any standard digital image format including, for example, JPEG or TIFF format. determining a set of providers that provide medical care, wherein individual providers of the set of providers are associated with individual electronic health record systems; Lash discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose above limitation. However, Marshall discloses: Marshall [0028] The described embodiment, a medical information system, allows users to control their medical information and to share their medical information across disparate health care provider systems. The user's medical information is gathered into personal health records. Medical information can be exchanged over the Internet through an interface. The exchange can involve uploading information from the health provider's system to the personal health records, or can involve downloading information from the personal health records to the health care provider's system. Uploading and downloading is facilitated by a health record access ID. The user may control uploading and downloading by user selected health care professionals or providers. The downloading permits a user to provide a new health care provider, and specifically a health care professional, with relevant medical information. The exchange can reach across disparate systems by converting medical information from one standard or format used by a health care provider to one used to store personal health records. Further, the medical information system facilitates exchange of both clinical data and secure messages from a user to a selected health care professional, and vice versa. In describing this medical information system an example of equipment involved in creating the system is explained, then various aspects of a personal health record are described. Finally, interfaces to the personal health record and data exchange including secure messaging are detailed. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lash to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Mardhall for the purpose of allowing user to control their medical information and to share their medical information across disparate health care provider systems providing, for presentation within the application at the user device, a second user interface view comprising a search bar for searching for a subset of providers of the set of providers Lash [0065] The opening or "home" screen of FIG. 1 presents a high level overview of the basic data that has been entered into the system. Thus, this screen presents the user with listings of individuals, providers and plans that have been entered, a listing of upcoming appointments and reminders, and expense summaries and menus for entering new information, such as new records relating to a medical event, and for searching existing records for purposes of viewing or modifying them. responsive to a second user input, received within the application, that selects a first provider of the subset of providers, initiating using a provide subscription server, a connection sequence for establishing a first persistent data connection between the application of the user device and a first electronic health record system of the first provider, wherein the provider subscription server is operated by a first entity and the first electronic health record system is operated by a second entity that is distinct from the first entity, wherein the first persistent data connection excludes a connection with the provider subscription server, and wherein the first persistent data connection enables the application to download first health record data of the user from the first electronic health record system and receive first updates to the first health record data Marshall [0028] The described embodiment, a medical information system, allows users to control their medical information and to share their medical information across disparate health care provider systems. The user's medical information is gathered into personal health records. Medical information can be exchanged over the Internet through an interface. The exchange can involve uploading information from the health provider's system to the personal health records, or can involve downloading information from the personal health records to the health care Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Finkelstein (US 2017/0109570) Combination A discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose wherein the connection sequence comprises connecting to a gateway of the first electronic health record system. However, Finkelstein discloses: Finkelstein [0037] In certain preferred embodiments, the system may be configured to obtain at least an identity of a casualty that has not pre-registered by accessing images retained in a social network. In other embodiments, the invention may also provide interfaces or a gateway to the participants Electronic Health Record. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Finkelstein for the purpose of downloading health data via a gateway. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Finkelstein in view of Daub (US 2015/0088545) in view of Jung (US 9,747,579) Combination A in view of Finkelstein discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose wherein connecting to the gateway comprises receiving, via a third user interface view, user credentials associated with the first electronic health record system. However, Daub discloses: Daub [0048] Authentication database 135 may store information used in an authentication process, for example user identifiers, passwords, access privileges, user preferences, user statistics, and the like. User database 140 maintains user information and credentials for health records management system 115 users (e.g., user 105). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Daub for the purpose of storing information used in an authentication process, for example user identifiers, passwords, access privileges, user preferences, user statistics. Arguably, Daub discloses third user interface view. However, Jung discloses: Jung column 3 lines 57-62, Another embodiment provides a system. The system includes an electronic device having a plurality of user interfaces, an assistance file having a content related to the electronic device, and an assistance manager. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Jung for the purpose of providing assistance corresponding to the query through a second interface associated with the electronic device [abstract]. Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Finkelstein in view of Higgs (US 2017/0011174). Combination A in view of Finkelstein discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose downloading, to the user device, health record data from the gateway. However, Higgs discloses: Higgs claim 14, A method for transferring patient medical records comprising the steps of: inserting an initiator in a web enabling device, said initiator having a server-side application; executing a client-side application in the web enabling device's processor, accessing through the client-side application a cloud-based personal health records module, said client-side application for web access to a cloud device for connecting and communicating with said cloud-based personal health records module, and downloading a patient's patient data from said cloud-based personal health records Examiner Note: gateway = cloud-based personal health records module It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Higgs for the purpose of executing a client-side application in the web enabling device's processor and accessing through the client-side application a cloud- based personal health records module. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Finkelstein in view of Higgs in view of Sirleaf (US 2011/0071852) in view of Jung. Combination A in view of Finkelstein in view of Higgs discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose indexing the health record data according to a set of predefined categories; and providing, for presentation at the user device, a third user interface view that identifies the set of predefined categories. However, Sirleaf discloses: Sirleaf [0039] In some embodiments the first patient health record 140 is stored within the first local database using a first system identifier 150 corresponding to the first patient. For example, the database may index health records according to corresponding system identifiers, which may include an alphanumeric string representing a specific patient. In certain cases the system identifiers do not include personally identifiable information (e.g., they are random or otherwise arbitrary strings), SO that records can be accessed and retrieved without the need for personally identifiable information. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify combination A in view of Finkelstein in view of Higgs to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Sirleaf for the purpose of providing identifiers which do not include personally identifiable information (e.g., they are random or otherwise arbitrary strings), SO that records can be accessed and retrieved without the need for personally identifiable information. Arguably, Sirleaf discloses third user interface view. However, Jung discloses: Jung column 3 lines 57-62, Another embodiment provides a system. The system includes an electronic device having a plurality of user interfaces, an assistance file having a content related to the electronic device, and an assistance manager. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Jung for the purpose of providing assistance corresponding to the query through a second interface associated with the electronic device [abstract]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Jung for the purpose of providing assistance corresponding to the query through a second interface associated with the electronic device [abstract]. Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Fowler (US 9,973,455) Combination A discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose wherein determining the set of providers that provide the medical care comprises determining the set of providers based on at least one of a location associated with the user device, an association between the set of providers and user information associated with the user device, or a feature of each provider of the set of providers. However, Fowler discloses: Fowler clam 9. A computer-implemented method, comprising: determining that a trigger event has been detected, the trigger event corresponding to a change in medical responsibility for a patient; evaluating aspects of the trigger event to identify a medical provider to receive (i) a notification about the trigger event and (ii) a first tailored version of a medical message corresponding to the patient; accessing an authorized medical provider list stored in a central database; evaluating the authorized medical provider list to determine that the medical provider is authorized to receive the first tailored version of the medical message corresponding to the patient, other authorized medical providers being authorized to receive other tailored versions of the medical message; determining a medical provider feature associated with the medical provider and corresponding to a medical provider parameter included in a set of messaging rules It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify combination A to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Fowler for the purpose of evaluating the authorized medical provider list to Claim(s) 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lash (US 2005/0010446) in view of Marshall (US 2008/0133273) Examiner Notes: Hereafter, above references will be entered combination A. a memory configured to store computer-executable instructions; and a processor configured to access the memory and execute the computer- executable instructions to at least: Lash [0054] [0055] [0096] [0098] responsive to a first user input, providing, for presentation within an application at a user device, a first user interface view comprising a first user interface element for connecting the application with a plurality of electronic health record systems associated with a plurality of providers to enable downloading of health record data of the user from the plurality of electronic health record systems Lash [abstract] End-user software for monitoring health care benefits and maintaining individual personal health histories is disclosed. The software provides the ability for a user to monitor health care services delivered by a plurality of different health care providers, such as doctors, clinics, dentists, pharmacies, etc. under a plurality of different health benefit plans to a plurality of different individuals, such as members of an immediate or extended family. Specific medical events are logged and tracked, and payment information associated with the events can be reconciled, kept open and/or marked for follow-up action. Various planning tools are available to assist the user in making health care decisions, such as which plan to choose and when to make discretionary purchases of health care related goods and services. The software is able to download information from health care providers, health benefit plans, etc. Lash [0075] It is anticipated that health care providers will make medical history information available online to their patients for secure downloading. Such information may include text information, e.g., a medical specialist's report, and image information, e.g., a set of x-rays. It is foreseeable that such information will be made available in standardized formats. For example, text information may be made available in XML format (including its common derivatives, such as RTF and HTML), and image information may be made available in any standard digital image format including, for example, JPEG or TIFF format. determining a set of providers that provide medical care, wherein individual providers of the set of providers are associated with individual electronic health record systems; Lash discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose above limitation. However, Marshall discloses: Marshall [0028] The described embodiment, a medical information system, allows users to control their medical information and to share their medical information across disparate health care provider systems. The user's medical information is gathered into personal health records. Medical information can be exchanged over the Internet through an interface. The exchange can involve uploading information from the health provider's system to the personal health records, or can involve downloading information from the personal health records to the health care provider's system. Uploading and downloading is facilitated by a health record access ID. The user may control uploading and downloading by user selected health care professionals or providers. The downloading permits a user to provide a new health care provider, and specifically a health care professional, with relevant medical information. The exchange can reach across disparate systems by converting medical information from one standard or format used by a health care provider to one used to store personal health records. Further, the medical information system facilitates exchange of both clinical data and secure messages from a user to a selected health care professional, and vice versa. In describing this medical information system an example of equipment involved in creating the system is explained, then various aspects of a personal health record are described. Finally, interfaces to the personal health record and data exchange including secure messaging are detailed. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lash to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Mardhall for the purpose of allowing user to control their medical information and to share their medical information across disparate health care provider systems providing, for presentation within the application at the user device, a second user interface view comprising a search bar for searching for a subset of providers of the set of providers Lash [0065] The opening or "home" screen of FIG. 1 presents a high level overview of the basic data that has been entered into the system. Thus, this screen presents the user with listings of individuals, providers and plans that have been entered, a listing of upcoming appointments and reminders, and expense summaries and menus for entering new information, such as new records relating to a medical event, and for searching existing records for purposes of viewing or modifying them. responsive to a second user input, received within the application, that selects a first provider of the subset of providers, initiating using a provide subscription server, a connection sequence for establishing a first persistent data connection between the application of the user device and a first electronic health record system of the first provider, wherein the provider subscription server is operated by a first entity and the first electronic health record system is operated by a second entity that is distinct from the first entity, wherein the first persistent data connection excludes a connection with the provider subscription server, and wherein the first persistent data connection enables the application to download first health record data of the user from the first electronic health record system and receive first updates to the first health record data Marshall [0028] The described embodiment, a medical information system, allows users to control their medical information and to share their medical information across disparate health care provider systems. The user's medical information is gathered into personal health records. Medical information can be exchanged over the Internet through an interface. The exchange can involve uploading information from the health provider's system to the personal health records, or can involve downloading information from the personal health records to the health care Claim(s) 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Finkelstein (US 2017/0109570) Combination A discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose wherein the connection sequence comprises connecting to a gateway of the first electronic health record system. However, Finkelstein discloses: Finkelstein [0037] In certain preferred embodiments, the system may be configured to obtain at least an identity of a casualty that has not pre-registered by accessing images retained in a social network. In other embodiments, the invention may also provide interfaces or a gateway to the participants Electronic Health Record. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Finkelstein for the purpose of downloading health data via a gateway. Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Finkelstein in view of Daub (US 2015/0088545) in view of Jung (US 9,747,579) Combination A in view of Finkelstein discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose wherein connecting to the gateway comprises receiving, via a third user interface view, user credentials associated with the first electronic health record system. However, Daub discloses: Daub [0048] Authentication database 135 may store information used in an authentication process, for example user identifiers, passwords, access privileges, user preferences, user statistics, and the like. User database 140 maintains user information and credentials for health records management system 115 users (e.g., user 105). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Daub for the purpose of storing information used in an authentication process, for example user identifiers, passwords, access privileges, user preferences, user statistics. Arguably, Daub discloses third user interface view. However, Jung discloses: Jung column 3 lines 57-62, Another embodiment provides a system. The system includes an electronic device having a plurality of user interfaces, an assistance file having a content related to the electronic device, and an assistance manager. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify reference combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Jung for the purpose of providing assistance corresponding to the query through a second interface associated with the electronic device [abstract]. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Finkelstein in view of Higgs (US 2017/0011174). Combination A in view of Finkelstein discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose downloading, to the user device, health record data from the gateway. However, Higgs discloses: Higgs claim 14, A method for transferring patient medical records comprising the steps of: inserting an initiator in a web enabling device, said initiator having a server-side application; executing a client-side application in the web enabling device's processor, accessing through the client-side application a cloud-based personal health records module, said client-side application for web access to a cloud device for connecting and communicating with said cloud-based personal health records module, and downloading a patient's patient data from said cloud-based personal health records Examiner Note: gateway = cloud-based personal health records module It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify combination A in view of Finkelstein to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Higgs for the purpose of executing a client-side application in the web enabling device's processor and accessing through the client-side application a cloud- based personal health records module. Claim(s) 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Fowler (US 9,973,455) Combination A discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose wherein determining the set of providers that provide the medical care comprises determining the set of providers based on at least one of a location associated with the user device, an association between the set of providers and user information associated with the user device, or a feature of each provider of the set of providers. However, Fowler discloses: Fowler clam 9. A computer-implemented method, comprising: determining that a trigger event has been detected, the trigger event corresponding to a change in medical responsibility for a patient; evaluating aspects of the trigger event to identify a medical provider to receive (i) a notification about the trigger event and (ii) a first tailored version of a medical message corresponding to the patient; accessing an authorized medical provider list stored in a central database; evaluating the authorized medical provider list to determine that the medical provider is authorized to receive the first tailored version of the medical message corresponding to the patient, other authorized medical providers being authorized to receive other tailored versions of the medical message; determining a medical provider feature associated with the medical provider and corresponding to a medical provider parameter included in a set of messaging rules It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify combination A to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Fowler for the purpose of evaluating the authorized medical provider list to Claim(s) 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Caporal (US 2016/0072841). Combination A discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose wherein the first persistent data connection enables the application to download the first health record data from the first electronic health record system and receive the first updates to the first health record data without sharing the first health record data or the first updates with the provider subscription server. Caporal [0012]. Some examples of the tasks capable of being performed include causing a file to become accessible on a client device of a user specified in a communication, causing a file to be automatically downloaded to a client device, denying or removing access to a file on a client device, making a file required for a user or a group of users, or causing a file to become accessible on client devices associated with a user group. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify combination A to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Caporal for the purpose of a computing environment can parse communications to identify one or more substrings that are indicative of a task, see [0012]. Claim(s) 23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Caporal (US 2016/0072841). Combination A discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose wherein the first persistent data connection enables the application to download the first health record data from the first electronic health record system and receive the first updates to the first health record data without sharing the first health record data or the first updates with the provider subscription server. Caporal [0012]. Some examples of the tasks capable of being performed include causing a file to become accessible on a client device of a user specified in a communication, causing a file to be automatically downloaded to a client device, denying or removing access to a file on a client device, making a file required for a user or a group of users, or causing a file to become accessible on client devices associated with a user group. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify combination A to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Caporal for the purpose of a computing environment can parse communications to identify one or more substrings that are indicative of a task, see [0012]. Claim(s) 24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combination A in view of Caporal (US 2016/0072841). Combination A discloses elements of the claimed invention as noted but does not disclose wherein the first persistent data connection enables the application to download the first health record data from the first electronic health record system and receive the first updates to the first health record data without sharing the first health record data or the first updates with the provider subscription server. Caporal [0012]. Some examples of the tasks capable of being performed include causing a file to become accessible on a client device of a user specified in a communication, causing a file to be automatically downloaded to a client device, denying or removing access to a file on a client device, making a file required for a user or a group of users, or causing a file to become accessible on client devices associated with a user group. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify combination A to obtain above limitation based on the teachings of Caporal for the purpose of a computing environment can parse communications to identify one or more substrings that are indicative of a task, see [0012]. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 8/28/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant Argues: A. Independent Claims 2, 9, and 16 Applicant respectfully submits that the cited references fail to disclose or make obvious all features of claim 2. For example, the cited references fail to disclose or make obvious at least the following feature of claim 2: wherein the provider subscription server [which is used to initiate the connection sequence] is operated by a first entity and the first electronic health record system is operated by a second entity that is distinct from the first entity, wherein the first persistent data connection excludes a connection with the provider subscription server Independent claims 9 and 16 have been amended to recite similar subject matter. As discussed during the interview, Cifelli at 12:18-25 discusses that "From time to time, a user device may disconnect from the app provider system. For instance, the user device may bePage powered down or the user may sever the secure, persistent connection between the user app and the app provider system. FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate different embodiments for the app provider system's failback mechanisms for handling communications when a user device is not connected to the app provider system." Applicant submits, however, that this does not disclose "wherein the provider subscription server [which is used to initiate the connection sequence] is operated by a first entity and the first electronic health record system is operated by a second entity that is distinct from the first entity, wherein the first persistent data connection excludes a connection with the provider subscription server," as claim 2 recites. Cifelli fails to disclose anything relating to an architecture that includes a "user device," "a provider subscription server," and "a first electronic health record system," much less one that defines that the server and system are operated by distinct entities, as claim 2 recites. Thus, Applicant respectfully submits that claim 2 is allowable over Cifelli. The remaining references have not been cited for, and as cited do not, remedy the deficiencies of Cifelli. Thus, Applicant respectfully submits that independent claim 2, as amended, stands allowable at least over the cited references, and respectfully requests that the rejection of this claim be withdrawn. As an additional example discussed during the interview, this particular architecture enables creation of the "first persistent data connection between the . . . user device and [the] first electronic health record system of the provider" in a manner that "excludes a connection with the provider subscription service." Marshall, at 28, describes that "a medical information system, allows users to control their medical information and to share their medical information across disparate health care provider systems. The user's medical information is gathered into personal health records. Medical information can be exchanged over the Internet through an interface. The exchange can involve uploading information from the health provider's system to the personal health records, or can involve downloading information from the personal health records to the health care provider's system." As discussed during the interview, because the provider subscription server is not part of the persistent data connection, it cannot and will not receive "the first health record data of the user" or "first updates to the first health record data," which are shared by the first electronic health record system with the application of the user device. This arrangement was purposefully designed to put barriers between entities in the architecture to ensure that sensitive health data is not shared with the provider subscriptionPage 12 of 14 server. Thus, unlike Marshall that describes "downloading" to a health care provider's system, the amended claim provides unique persistent data connection. Thus, Applicant respectfully submits that claim 2 is allowable over Marshall. The remaining references have not been cited for, and as cited do not, remedy the deficiencies of Marshall. Thus, Applicant respectfully submits that independent claim 2, as amended, stands allowable at least over the cited references, and respectfully requests that the rejection of this claim be withdrawn. Applicant respectfully submits that independent claims 9 and 16 are allowable at least for reasons similar to those discussed above in connection with independent claim 2. Dependent claims 4-8 depend from independent claim 2, dependent claims 11-15 depend from independent claim 9, and dependent claims 18-21 depend from independent claim 16. As discussed above, claims 2, 9, and 16 are believed to be allowable. Thus, claims 4-8, 11- 15, and 18-21 are also believed to be allowable at least by virtue of their dependency from an allowable base claim. At least some of these claims may also be allowable for the additional features that each recites. B. Dependent Claims 4-8, 11-15, and 18-21 Dependent claims 4-8, 11-15, and 18-21 depend from one of independent claims 2, 9, and 16. Thus, claims 4-8, 11-15, and 18-21 are also believed to be allowable at least by virtue of their dependency from an allowable base claim. At least some of these claims may also be allowable for the additional features that each recites. II. New Claims As noted above, Applicant herein adds new claims 22-24 and. Applicant respectfully requests favorable consideration of these claims. III. Amendment To The Claims Unless otherwise specified or addressed in the remarks section, amendments to the claims are made for purposes of clarity, and are not intended to alter the scope of the claims or limit any equivalents thereof. The amendments are supported by the specification and do not add new matter. In addition, by focusing on specific claims and claim elements in the discussion above, Applicant does not imply that other claim elements are disclosed or suggested by the references. In addition, any characterizations of claims and/or cited art are being made to facilitate expeditious prosecution of this application. Applicant reserves the right to pursue at a later date any other broader or narrower claims that capture any subject matter supported by the present disclosure, including subject matter found to be specifically disclaimed herein or by another prosecution. Accordingly, reviewers of this or any child or related prosecution history shall not reasonably infer that Applicant have made any disclaimers or disavowals of any subject matter supported by the present disclosure. Examiner Responds: Examiner is not persuaded. Claims 2, 9 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement, see above. Particularly, one of ordinary skill in the art is not able to understand wherein the first persistent data connection excludes a connection with the provider subscription server. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ETIENNE PIERRE LEROUX whose telephone number is (571)272-4022. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 am to 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Apu Mofiz can be reached at 571 272 4080. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ETIENNE P LEROUX/Primary Examiner of Art Unit 2161
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Aug 12, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 26, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 26, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743434
SEARCH AND SEMANTIC SIMILARITY DOMAIN DETERMINATION
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730790
System and Method for Capturing, Preserving, and Representing Human Experiences and Personality Through a Digital Interface
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724759
System and Method for Capturing, Preserving, and Representing Human Experiences and Personality Through a Digital Interface.
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12705226
Refining Location Estimates and Reverse Geocoding Based on a User Profile
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699900
PATTERN-BASED CLASSIFICATION
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+5.3%)
2y 6m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1116 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month