Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/022,625

HEALTH CHECK SYSTEM FOR STORAGE CAPACITOR

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jan 15, 2025
Priority
Jan 16, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0006744
Examiner
POTHEN, FEBA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fadu Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
527 granted / 650 resolved
+21.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
673
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
56.6%
+16.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 650 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/15/25 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 3, the limitation of “the reference number of switchings” lacks antecedent basis since no reference is disclosed in the claim nor claim 1. The limitation of “Equation 1 below” and “Equation 1 above” also should be amended since the terms “below” and “above” are relative terms and the claim should be amended to recite the Equation at the first instance in the claim. For example the claim should be amended to: “the determination unit calculates…according to Equation 1: Scr = Cr x (Vh – Vl)/ Q1period, wherein Scr is a reference number of switchings…and Q1period is a charging amount period; and the determination unit determines the storage capacitor to be in a steady state when the counted number of switchings satisfies Inequation 1: Scr….wherein Scc is the counted…greater than 1”. Claims 4 and 6 are dependent on claim 3 and therefore inherits its deficiencies. Regarding claim 5, the limitation of “the capacitance of the storage capacitor” lacks antecedent basis. The limitation of “Equation 2 below” and “Equation 2 above” also should be amended since the terms “below” and “above” are relative terms and the claim should be amended to recite the Equation at the first instance in the claim. Regarding claim 6, the limitation of “Equation 3 below” and “Equation 3 above” and “Equation 4 below” and “Equation 4 above” and “Inequation 1 above” should be amended since the terms “below” and “above” are relative terms and the claim should be removed or amended to recite the Equation at the first instance in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jin et al., US 20230378787 Regarding claim 1, Jin discloses a health check system for a storage capacitor that checks a capacitance of a storage capacitor charged by being electrically connected to an output terminal of a switching converter (Fig. 3; capacitor 123 connected to output terminal of charging circuit 121 formed as a DC-DC converter) that, when a preset level of a charging voltage is a first voltage level, boosts the voltage level to a second voltage level by performing a switching operation according to a switching period (Fig. 4; converter 1211 shown as a boost converter ;¶[0038]), the health check system for a storage capacitor comprising: a switching counter that counts the number of switchings by which the switching operation is performed in a switching duration in which the switching operation is performed (Fig. 4-6; counter 1254; ¶[0098]; counts number of times M1 switches); a charging amount calculation unit that calculates an amount of charging per period that is charged in the storage capacitor during the switching period (¶[0043]; controller 1213 of charging circuit determines a Vout indicative of a charging voltage) and a determination unit that determines a status of the storage capacitor based on the first voltage level, the second voltage level, the counted number of switchings, and the calculated amount of charging per period (Fig. 3-6; ¶[0070]-[0077]; first and second determination circuit 1253, 1256 and mode setting circuit 1251 of heath monitoring circuit 125 determines charging health state based on counted switchings, Vout voltage and voltage levels). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jin et al., US 20230378787 in view of Yoshida, US 20160266189 Regarding claim 2, Jin teaches an inductor of a switching converter (Fig. 4; inductor L1 converter 1211). Jin is silent in wherein the charging amount calculation unit calculates the charging amount per period based on current flowing through the inductor of the switching converter and the switching period. Yoshida teaches wherein the charging amount calculation unit calculates the charging amount per period based on current flowing through an element coupled to the capacitor and the switching period (Fig. 1; ¶[0057]-[0062]; current sensor 11 used to measure current and determine charge). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Yoshida into Jin to provide an estimated capacitance of the capacitor and to make a determination of the quality of the capacitor. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FEBA POTHEN whose telephone number is (571)272-9219. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Judy Nguyen can be reached on 571.272.2258. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FEBA POTHEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 15, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748135
SYSTEME DE MESURE D'UN COURANT ELECTRIQUE ET DISPOSITIF DE DETECTION D'UN COURANT ELECTRIQUE POUR UN TEL SYSTEME
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742627
CAPACITATIVE SENSING DEVICE FOR IN-SITU MONITORING OF COATINGS
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745334
Self-Test Procedure for a Control Device
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738184
ELECTROLUMINESCENCE INSPECTION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736564
INTEGRATED OPTICAL SYSTEM-BASED OPTICAL CURRENT SENSOR SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+11.2%)
2y 7m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 650 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month