Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/023,702

TRANSSCLERAL ILLUMINATOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Priority
Feb 22, 2024 — provisional 63/556,499
Examiner
GREEN, MICHELLE CHRISTINE
Art Unit
3773
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Alcon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
735 granted / 886 resolved
+13.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
926
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 886 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Singh et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2020/0163737 A1, hereinafter “Singh”). Singh discloses, regarding claim 1, a device (10, see Figs. 2-4) comprising: a base (16) having an inferior surface (22) and a superior surface (see annotated Fig. 2 below), the inferior surface configured to interface with an external portion (31) of a human eye (30, see Fig. 3), the base having a geometry that is based on at least two cannulas (e.g. cannulas can be inserted through 66, ) configured to be inserted in a pars plana of the human eye (see Fig. 3); and an optical fiber (14, see para. [0056]) disposed in the base (see Fig. 3), the optical fiber configured to transmit light through the base and the external portion of the human eye to illuminate an internal portion of the human eye (see para. [0060]). PNG media_image1.png 359 565 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, wherein the geometry includes an aperture (66) configured to enclose at least one of the at least two cannulas (see Fig. 2, see para. [0060]). Regarding claim 3, wherein the geometry includes an inner diameter (see annotated Fig. 2 above) configured to enclose at least one of the at least two cannulas (see Fig. 2, see para. [0060]). Regarding claim 4, wherein the geometry includes an outer diameter (see annotated Fig. 2 above) configured to be disposed between the at least two cannulas (note that cannulas can be placed around e.g. outside of the outer diameter so that the outer diameter is disposed between the cannulas). Regarding claim 5, further comprising an additional optical fiber disposed in the base, the additional optical fiber configured to transmit additional light through the base and the external portion of the human eye to illuminate the internal portion of the human eye. Regarding claim 6, further comprising a reflective portion of the superior surface configured to reflect the light to illuminate the internal portion of the human eye (see paras. [0054]-[0055], note use of cladding to propagate light to the light emitting end 52 via total internal reflection). Regarding claim 7, further comprising a masked portion of the superior surface configured to prevent transmission of the light through the superior surface (see paras. [0054]-[0055], note use of cladding). Regarding claim 8, wherein the external portion of the human eye includes at least one of the pars plana of the human eye or a fornix of the human eye (see Fig. 3). Regarding claim 9, wherein the geometry is adjustable to increase or decrease an outer diameter of the base (see para. [0058] “flexible” and “low durometer material”, e.g. would be capable of being adjusted either compressed to decrease the outer diameter and then allowed to regain the uncompressed diameter e.g. increase). Singh discloses, regarding 10, a transscleral illuminator (10, see Figs. 2-4) comprising: a base (16) having a first surface (22) and a second surface (see annotated Fig. 2 above), the first surface configured to contact a sclera of a human eye (see Fig. 3), the base having an adjustable geometry (see para. [0058] “flexible” and “low durometer material”, e.g. would be capable of being adjusted either compressed to decrease the outer diameter and then allowed to regain the uncompressed diameter e.g. increase); and at least one optical fiber (14) partially disposed within the base (see Fig. 3), the at least one optical fiber configured to transmit light from a light source through the first surface and the sclera to illuminate an inner portion of the human eye (see para. [0063]). Regarding claim 11, further comprising a recess (66) of the adjustable geometry configured to interface with a cannula (see Fig. 3, see para. [0060]). Regarding claim 12, further comprising an aperture of the adjustable geometry configured to enclose a cannula (e.g. cannula inserted through 66, see Fig. 3, see para. [0060]). Regarding claim 13, further comprising a masked portion of the second surface configured to prevent transmission of the light from the light source through the second surface (see paras. [0054]-[0055], note use of cladding). Regarding claim 14, further comprising a reflective portion of the second surface configured to reflect the light from the light source (see paras. [0054]-[0055], note use of cladding to propagate light to the light emitting end 52 via total internal reflection). Regarding claim 15, wherein the first surface is configured to maintain a relative orientation between the base and the sclera (see para. [0060]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michelle C. Green whose telephone number is (571)270-7051. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday between 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo C. Robert, at (571) 272-4719. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.C.G/ Examiner, Art Unit 3773 /JACQUELINE T JOHANAS/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765919
SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH DEFORMITY CORRECTION
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12758266
TENSEGRITY EXTERNAL FIXATION SYSTEM TO DISTRACT BONES
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758275
ADAPTER DEVICE AND SYSTEM INCLUDING AN ADAPTER DEVICE AND A BONE ANCHOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12746042
BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLY WITH BONE DEBRIS SWEEP RING IN RECEIVER SUB-ASSEMBLY
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746043
PIVOTAL BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A RESTRAINED PRE-LOADED OPEN RING RETAINER
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 7m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 886 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month