Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/024,693

OPERATION METHOD OF RADIATION IMAGING APPARATUS AND RADIATION IMAGING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Priority
Jan 25, 2024 — JP 2024-009602
Examiner
MAUPIN, HUGH H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
868 granted / 993 resolved
+27.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1005
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
67.1%
+27.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 993 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-7, 9-17 and 19-20is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tajima et al. (US 2015/0131784) hereinafter known as “Tajima”, and further in view of Weisfield et al. (US 2020/0341156) hereinafter known as “Weisfield”. With regards to claim 1 and 11, Tajima discloses a radiation imaging system (FIG. 5) and an operation method [0003] that includes a plurality of pixels ([0082]; “ The pixels 40 include normal pixels 40a and measurement pixels 40b.”), with each pixel of the plurality of pixels including a conversion element configured to convert radiation or light ([0080]; The image detector 30 is.. an indirect conversion type having a scintillator…made of a phosphor.”) into an electric charge ([0081]; “…the pixel 40 is provided with a photoelectric converter for producing the electric charge (electron and positive hole pairs) upon entry of the visible light,…”) and to accumulate the electric charge ([0082]; “The normal pixels 40a are used to detect the X-ray image, and the electric charge accumulated in the normal pixels 40a is read out after completion of X-ray imaging.”)[0099]; “During the accumulation operation of the image detector 30, the TFTs are in an off state, and thus each of the normal pixels 40a accumulates the produced electric charge in the photoelectric converter.”), and a switching element configured to read an electrical signal corresponding to the electric charge ([0006]; “…the electric charge accumulated in each pixel is read out to a signal processing circuit through a switching element such as a TFT (thin film transistor).”)([0079][0081]; “…the pixel 40 is provided with a photoelectric converter for producing the electric charge…upon entry of the visible light, and the TFT being a switching element…”)[0083]. a bias power supply configured to supply a bias potential to the conversion element via a bias line ([0083]; “These bias lines are connected to a bias power source through one bus. Since application of a bias voltage by the bias power source produces an electric field in the semiconducting layer,…”); a drive circuit configured to supply a control signal to a control electrode of the switching element via a drive line and to control the switching element; ([0085]; “The gate driver 44 performs an accumulation operation for accumulating the signal charge in the normal pixels 40a in accordance with the received X-ray dose, … by driving the TFTs under control by a controller 52…the gate driver 44 sequentially issues gate pulses P1 to Pn at predetermined intervals to activate the scan lines 42 one by one in a sequential manner. Thus, the TFTs of one row connected to the activated scan line 42 are turned into an on state.”); a readout circuit ([0088]; integrating amplifiers 46, CDS 47, MUX 48, A/D 49) configured to read an electrical signal from the switching element via a signal line ([0085]; “…a readout (actual reading) operation for reading out the accumulated signal charge from the normal pixels 40a,… Upon turning on the TFTs, the electric charge accumulated in the normal pixels 40a is read out to the signal lines 43…”); and a controller ([0085]; controller 52), the system and method comprising: measuring an amount of electric charge based on a current flowing through one of the signal line ([0086] “The measurement pixel 40b is used for measuring the X-ray dose, and has the same fundamental structure including the photoelectric converter and the like as the normal pixel 40a. …the electric charge produced by the photoelectric converter of the measurement pixel 40b flows into the signal line 43, ...”) [0089][0100]; the bias line [0083][0181], and the drive line [0085] while the switching element transitions from a non-conductive state to a conductive state or from a conductive state to a non-conductive state ([0086]; turn-on and -off of the TFT)[0100]. Tajima teaches that the controller reads out position data and a specific gate driver turns on the TFTs for measurement of the measurement pixels 40b [0180]. Tajima further teaches of a controller that performs control in accordance with a judgment result of said judging section (claim 2). The reference teaches that the controller controls and drives the TFTs [0085]. Finally, the reference teaches “… controller 52 applies various types of image processing including the offset correction, the sensitivity correction, and the defect correction to the X-ray image written to the memory 51. The offset correction eliminates fixed pattern noise caused by the individual difference of the signal processing circuit 45 or an imaging environment. The sensitivity correction corrects sensitivity variations among the photoelectric converters of the normal pixels 40a, variations in the output properties of the signal processing circuit 45, and the like. The defect correction performs linear interpolation of defect pixels identified beforehand, the measurement pixels 40b, and the normal pixels 40a arranged in the same column as the measurement pixel 40b, with the use of the pixel values in the vicinity thereof.” [0109] Tajima do not disclose determining, by the controller, a characteristic of the switching element based on the measured amount of electric charge. In the same field of endeavor, Weisfield discloses systems and methods for stabilizing the threshold voltages [0011] in TFTs [0012]. Weisfield teaches of utilizing a variety of circuits used to generate the threshold voltage in a transistor, wherein such circuits includes voltage sources, current sources, switches, voltmeters, ammeters, or the like to apply one or more voltages and/or currents to measure the threshold voltage [0029][0030]. Weisfield discloses a detector array 211 that includes a probe pixel [0037; 202]. The probe pixel is coupled to a control circuit 106 which is configured to generate control signals for the pixels 212, the probe pixel 202 and the transistors 216 of the said pixels 212 [0039]. Further, the switches SW (see FIG. 2C) may be used to place the probe pixel 202 into a diagnostic mode for the measurement of threshold voltage of the transistor 204 [0040]. Finally, the reference [0001] teaches “Some transistors have threshold voltages that shift over time when turned on. The shift of the threshold voltage may reduce the performance of the device and eventually render the device inoperable.” In view of Weisfield, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill within the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method and system of Tajima to measure a characteristic (such as threshold voltage shift) of the switching element based on the measured amount of electric charge (such as measurements from a ammeter which can measures current from the transistors/switches). With regards to claim 2 and 12, Tajima, in view of Weisfield, discloses the system and method according to claim 1 and 12, wherein the amount of electric charge is measured while the switching element provided in each pixel of the plurality of pixels transitions from the non- conductive state to the conductive state or from the conductive state to the non- conductive state (Tajima; [0085][0096]), and the characteristic of the switching element is determined based on the measured amount of electric charge in each pixel of the plurality of pixels (see the rejection of claim 1). With regards to claim 3 and 13, Tajima, in view of Weisfield, discloses the system and method according to claim 1 and 11, wherein the amount of electric charge is measured after reset of the conversion element. (Tajima; [0089][0100][0103]) With regards to claim 4 and 14, Tajima, in view of Weisfield, discloses the system and method according to claim 1 and 11, further comprising: measuring, in a case where the switching element is in the non-conductive state, a first amount of electric charge (Tajima; [0090][0096]; In the standby mode, the dark charge is produced in each pixel 40 of the image detector 30…”); measuring, in a case where the switching element is in the conductive state, a second amount of electric charge (Tajima; [0096]; “Upon turning on the TFTs of the normal pixels 40a of one row, the dark charge accumulated in these normal pixels 40a is readout…”)(Weisfield; [0050][0051]; “When a predetermined level of a test voltage is applied to the transistors of the pixels 302, the measured “dark level” would be based on the threshold voltage of the transistors…”); and obtaining a difference between the first amount of electric charge and the second amount of electric charge (Weisfield; [0055]; “…. when the transistors of the pixels 302 are in a state with a known threshold voltage or threshold voltage range, the dark level of the detector 300 may be generated ... Later, during operation, the prior dark level may be compared with a current dark level measured…”). With regards to claim 5 and 15, Tajima, in view of Weisfield, discloses the system and method according to claim 1 and 11, wherein the switching element includes a channel layer that comprises an oxide semiconductor. (Weisfield; [0013][0018]) With regards to claim 6 and 16, Tajima, in view of Weisfield, discloses the system and method according to claim 1 and 11, wherein the characteristic of the switching element is determined by comparing the measured amount of electric charge with a predetermined reference value. (Tajima; [0030])(Weisfield; [0024]; reference threshold voltage) With regards to claim 7 and 17, Tajima, in view of Weisfield, discloses the system and method according to claim 1 and 11, wherein the characteristic of the switching element includes information concerning a threshold voltage of the switching element. (Westfield; [0024][0025]) With regards to claim 9 and 19, Tajima, in view of Weisfield, discloses the system and method according to claim 1, wherein the amount of electric charge is measured by amount of electric charge measurement unit. (Weisfield; [0029][0041]; ammeter) With regards to claim 10 and 20, Tajima, in view of Weisfield, discloses the system and method according to claim 9 and 19, wherein the amount of electric charge measurement unit includes an integral amplifier. (Tajima; [0087]; integrating amplifiers 46) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8 and 18 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: With regards to claim 8 and 18, Tajima, in view of Weisfield, discloses the system and method according to claim 7 and 17, further comprising determining, by the controller, a state of the radiation imaging apparatus by comparing an allowable value with a number of switching elements whose information concerning the threshold voltage falls outside a predetermined range. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sekine et al. (US 2017/0250214) Nathan et al. (US 2010/0140455) Rowland et al. (US 2006/0054835) Tredwell et al. (US 2013/0001426) Fish et al. (US 2022/0155248) Lee (US 5,652,430) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUGH H MAUPIN whose telephone number is (571)270-1495. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uzma Alam can be reached at 571-272-3995. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HUGH MAUPIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746412
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TREATMENT PLANNING
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749582
APPARATUS AND PROCESS FOR MEDICAL SENSING
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748046
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING A FORCE APPLIED TO A SAMPLE DURING AN OPTICAL INTERROGATION TECHNIQUE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746082
SURGERY ROBOT SYSTEM AND USE METHOD THEREFOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747942
EPOXY MOLDING COMPOUND THICKNESS MEASUREMENT METHOD AND MEASUREMENT DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 0m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 993 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month