Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/025,013

MICROPHONE SUSPENSION FOR MECHANICAL FEEDBACK REDUCTION IN HEARING DEVICES

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Priority
Jan 31, 2024 — provisional 63/627,462
Examiner
NI, SUHAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Starkey Laboratories Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
968 granted / 1118 resolved
+26.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1132
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
37.7%
-2.3% vs TC avg
§102
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1118 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The Art Unit location of your application in the PTO has changed. To aid in correlating any papers for this application, all further correspondence regarding this application should be directed to Group Art Unit 2691. This communication is responsive to the claims filed 01/16/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(b) or (pre-AIA ), Second Paragraph The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the limitation of “a microphone not connected to the housing” in line 4 is indefinite, since negative limitation has been involved in the claim. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Arndt et al. (U. S. Pat. No. - 5,204,917). Regarding claim 1, Arndt et al. disclose a hearing assistance device (10), comprising: a housing (Figs. 1A/1B); hearing assistance electronics (18) within the housing; a microphone (82) connected to a flex connector (98) and the housing; and flex connector configured to electrically and mechanically connect the microphone to the hearing assistance electronics (Figs. 8-11), wherein the flex connector has a length to thickness ratio configured to lower a resonant frequency of the flex connector and the microphone below an audible range of interest (col. 3, line 53 to col. 4, line 47). Regarding claim 2, Arndt et al. further disclose the hearing assistance device, wherein the microphone and the flex connector are oriented in a vertical plane with respect to a wearer of the hearing assistance device (Figs. 1A/1B). Regarding claim 3, Arndt et al. further disclose the hearing assistance device, comprising: mechanical dampers (88) configured to absorb vibration being transferred to the microphone. Regarding claim 4, Arndt et al. further disclose the hearing assistance device, wherein the mechanical dampers (88) are cylindrical, conical, rectangular or hemispherical in shape (Figs. 8-11). Regarding claim 5, Arndt et al. further disclose the hearing assistance device, wherein the mechanical dampers (104) are positioned above the microphone and the flex connector (Figs. 9-11). Regarding claim 6, Arndt et al. further disclose the hearing assistance device, wherein the mechanical dampers (104) are positioned below the microphone and the flex connector (Figs. 9-11). Regarding claim 7, Arndt et al. further disclose the hearing assistance device, wherein the mechanical dampers (88) are affixed to an interior surface of the housing (Figs 1A/1B and 9-11). Regarding claim 8, Arndt et al. further disclose the hearing assistance device, comprising: a layer of damping material on each side (90, 92, 94) of the flex connector configured to dampen mechanical vibration of the flex connector configured to absorb impact of the microphone (Figs. 9-11). Regarding claim 9, Arndt et al. further disclose the hearing assistance device, wherein the layer of damping material (88) includes a polymer or plastic material (col. 3, lines 54-64). Regarding claim 10, Arndt et al. further disclose the hearing assistance device, wherein the flex connector (88, 98, made by molded plastic) has a mass stiffness ratio configured to lower a resonant frequency of the flex connector and the microphone (16) below an audible range of interest (col. 3, lines 53 to col. 4, line 53). Method claims 11-20 are similar to claims 1-10 except for being couched in method terminology; such methods would be inherent when the structure is shown in the references. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUHAN NI whose telephone number is (571)272-7505. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday from 10:00 am to 6:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a PTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duc Nguyen can be reached on 571-272-7503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUHAN NI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745045
MICROPHONE DEVICE BASED ON TWO-DIMENSIONAL PIEZOELECTRIC MATERIAL LAYER HAVING PROTECTIVE LAYER FORMED THEREON, AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12732728
DISPLAY DEVICE AND AUDIO OUTPUT METHOD THEREOF
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726771
FABRIC MATERIAL INCLUDING WIRE DAMPER OF LOUDSPEAKER HAVING IMPROVED CENTER HOLE SHAPE BY WAVE CRESTS WITH UNEQUAL WIDTHS AND THE METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720266
BONE ANCHORED HEARING AID DEVICE UNIT
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713190
FITTING AGENT WITH USER MODEL INITIALIZATION FOR A HEARING DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.9%)
2y 4m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1118 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month