Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/025,152

WAFER SENSOR AND WAFER ALIGNMENT SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Priority
Jan 16, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0006758
Examiner
TABA, MONICA TERESA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
196 granted / 221 resolved
+28.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
238
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
57.1%
+17.1% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 221 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 12,130,507 ("Chow"). Regarding claim 1, Chow discloses a wafer sensor comprising: a wafer substrate (36, Fig. 3 or 36’, Fig. 6); and a plurality of pixels (PCM pixels, Fig. 2B, also, see Figs. 3-6, showing at least 3 pixels corresponding to PCM 14, 16, 18, as an example, and/or see unit-cells 76, 78, 80, 82, Fig. 7A, as a second example) on the wafer substrate (36, Fig. 3 or 36’, Fig. 6), wherein each pixel of the plurality of pixels comprises: a blocking layer (34, Figs. 3, 5 or 34’, Fig. 6), a reflective layer (30, Figs. 3, 5-6, col. 8, lines 6-8) on the blocking layer (34, Fig. 3 or 34’, Fig. 6), a phase change material layer (22, 24, 26, Fig. 3 or 22’, 24’, 26’, Fig. 6) on the reflective layer (30, Figs. 3, 6), and a plurality of metal antennas (14, 16, 18, Fig. 3, or 14’, 16’, 18’, Fig. 6, and see two antennas 64/68 in unit cell 76, Fig. 7A, col. 10, lines 4-17) on the phase change material layer (22, 24, 25, Fig. 3 or 22’, 24’, 26’, Fig. 6, and see 62/69, Fig. 7A). Regarding claim 2, Chow discloses the wafer sensor of claim 1, further comprising a trench (9, Fig. 3, 5-6, col. 8, line 5, or see the space between PCM pixels within unit-cells in Fig. 7A for a second example of a trench) between two adjacent pixels of the plurality of pixels (between adjacent pixels corresponding to PCM 14, 16, 18, see col. 8, lines 10-11 and 14-21, the cavities maintain separation between the pixels so that they are individually addressed/heated, therefore functionally, they are a trench, similarly in Fig. 7A, the spaces between the PCM pixels are trenches). Regarding claim 3, Chow discloses the wafer sensor of claim 1, wherein the phase change material layer of each pixel of the plurality of pixels comprises Sb2Se3, Sb2S3, GeSbTe (col. 8, line 2), or GeSbSeTe (col. 7, line 56). Regarding claim 4, Chow discloses the wafer sensor of claim 1, wherein the reflective layer (30, Figs. 3, 6) of each pixel of the plurality of pixels (Fig. 7A) comprises aluminum, tungsten, or copper (col. 8, line 7). Regarding claim 5, Chow discloses the wafer sensor of claim 1, wherein each metal antenna of the plurality of metal antennas (14, 16, 18, Fig. 3, or 14’, 16’, 18’, Fig. 6, and see 64/68 in unit cell 76, Fig. 7A) of each pixel of the plurality of pixels (PCM pixels, Fig. 2B, and see unit-cells 76, 78, 80, 82, Fig. 7A) comprises aluminum, tungsten, or copper (col. 7, lines 22-23). Regarding claim 6, Chow discloses the wafer sensor of claim 1, wherein each pixel of the plurality of pixels further comprises: a first spacer (40, Fig. 5) between the reflective layer (30, Fig. 5) and the phase change material layer (22, 24, 26, Fig. 5); a second spacer (28, Fig. 5) between the phase change material layer (22, 24, 26, Fig. 5)and at least one metal antenna of the plurality of metal antennas (any one of 14, 16, 18, Fig. 5, the layer 28 is between antenna/PCM mesa laterally). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chow in view of U.S. Patent No. 11,187,891 ("Moon"). Regarding claim 8, Chow discloses the wafer sensor of claim 1, but does not disclose that each pixel of the plurality of pixels further comprises a passivation layer covering the plurality of metal antennas. However, Moon discloses a passivation layer (col. 6, lines 63-67) covering the plurality of metal antennas (140, Figs. 1-2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to include a passivation layer covering the metal antennas as disclosed by Moon in the device of Chow in order to protect the pixel from oxidation, moisture, and contamination. Claims 9-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chow in view of U.S. Patent Publication No. 2010/0038614 ("Hampton"). Regarding claim 9, Chow discloses a wafer alignment system comprising: a wafer sensor (Figs. 3, 5-6); wherein the wafer sensor comprises: a wafer substrate (36, Fig. 3,5 or 36’, Fig. 6); and a plurality of pixels (PCM pixels, Fig. 2B, also, see Figs. 3-6, showing at least 3 pixels corresponding to PCM 14, 16, 18, as an example, and/or see unit-cells 76, 78, 80, 82, Fig. 7A, as a second example) on the wafer substrate (36, Fig. 3 or 36’, Fig. 6), wherein each pixel of the plurality of pixels comprises: a blocking layer (34, Figs. 3, 5 or 34’, Fig. 6), a reflective layer (30, Figs. 3, 5-6, col. 8, lines 6-8) on the blocking layer (34, Fig. 3, 5 or 34’, Fig. 6), a phase change material layer (22, 24, 26, Fig. 3 or 22’, 24’, 26’, Fig. 6) on the reflective layer (30, Figs. 3, 6), and a plurality of metal antennas (14, 16, 18, Fig. 3, or 14’, 16’, 18’, Fig. 6, and see two antennas 64/68 in unit cell 76, Fig. 7A, col. 10, lines 4-17) on the phase change material layer (22, 24, 25, Fig. 3 or 22’, 24’, 26’, Fig. 6, and see 62/69, Fig. 7A). Chow does not disclose a chuck configured to support the wafer sensor and heat the wafer sensor; and a transfer device configured to transfer the wafer sensor to the chuck. However, Hampton discloses a chuck configured to support the wafer sensor (paragraph [0017], chuck not explicitly shown) and heat the wafer sensor (paragraph [0020]); and a transfer device configured to transfer the wafer sensor to the chuck (implied, see paragraphs [0017], [0019], substrate is positioned on the chuck). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to use a chuck for supporting and heating the wafer sensor and a transfer devce to place the wafer on the chuck as disclosed by Hampton in the device of Chow in order to provide stable and precise controlled surface during processing as well as maintain orientation/alignment. Regarding claim 10, Chow in view of Hampton discloses the wafer alignment system of claim 9, and Chow further discloses that the wafer sensor comprises a trench (9, Fig. 3, 5-6, col. 8, line 5, or see the space between PCM pixels within unit-cells in Fig. 7A for a second example of a trench) between two adjacent pixels of the plurality of pixels (between adjacent pixels corresponding to PCM 14, 16, 18, see col. 8, lines 10-11 and 14-21, the cavities maintain separation between the pixels so that they are individually addressed/heated, therefore functionally, they are a trench, similarly in Fig. 7A, the spaces between the PCM pixels are trenches). Regarding claim 11, Chow in view of Hampton discloses the wafer alignment system of claim 9, and Chow further discloses that the phase change material layer of each pixel of the plurality of pixels comprises Sb2Se3, Sb2S3, GeSbTe (col. 8, line 2), or GeSbSeTe (col. 7, line 56). Regarding claim 12, Chow in view of Hampton discloses the wafer alignment system of claim 9, and Chow further discloses that the reflective layer (30, Figs. 3, 6) of each pixel of the plurality of pixels (Fig. 7A) comprises aluminum, tungsten, or copper (col. 8, line 7). Regarding claim 13, Chow in view of Hampton discloses the wafer alignment system of claim 9, and Chow further discloses that each metal antenna of the plurality of metal antennas (14, 16, 18, Fig. 3, or 14’, 16’, 18’, Fig. 6, and see 64/68 in unit cell 76, Fig. 7A) of each pixel of the plurality of pixels (PCM pixels, Fig. 2B, and see unit-cells 76, 78, 80, 82, Fig. 7A) comprises aluminum, tungsten, or copper (col. 7, lines 22-23). Regarding claim 14, Chow discloses the wafer alignment system of claim 9, wherein each pixel of the plurality of pixels further comprises: a first spacer (40, Fig. 5) between the reflective layer (30, Fig. 5) and the phase change material layer (22, 24, 26, Fig. 5); a second spacer (28, Fig. 5) between the phase change material layer (22, 24, 26, Fig. 5)and at least one metal antenna of the plurality of metal antennas (any one of 14, 16, 18, Fig. 5, the layer 28 is between antenna/PCM mesa laterally). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7 and 15-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 7, the invention as claimed, specifically in combination with: the first and second spacers comprise silicon oxide, is not taught or made obvious by the prior art of record. Regarding claims 15-17, the invention as claimed, specifically in combination with: control the transfer device to adjust alignment based on the measured change in the phase change material layer, is not taught or made obvious by the prior art of record. Claims 18-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The invention as claimed, specifically in combination with: controlling, by the measurement station, the transfer device to adjust alignment of the wafer sensor based on the analyzed change in the phase change material layer, is not taught or made obvious by the prior art of record. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONICA T. TABA whose telephone number is (571)272-1583. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9 am - 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Georgia Epps can be reached at 571-272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MONICA T TABA/Examiner, Art Unit 2878
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751096
SOLAR BLIND SOLID STATE GALLIUM CONTAINING PHOTODIODE DEVICE AND RELATED METHOD
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742640
PHOTODETECTION DEVICE AND PHOTODETECTION SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736479
SEMICONDUCTOR MEASUREMENT APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736399
EMERGENCY LIGHT TESTING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736320
GROOVE SHAPE MEASURING METHOD AND GROOVE SHAPE MEASURING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+2.8%)
2y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 221 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month