Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 19/025,413

BOOM DEPLOYER FOR IN ORBIT DEPLOYMENT OF SATELLITE STRUCTURES, ANTENNAS, AND SENSORS

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Priority
Jan 16, 2024 — provisional 63/621,340
Examiner
XAVIER, VALENTINA
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Flexitech LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
560 granted / 749 resolved
+22.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
772
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 749 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. Claim 19 recites that the predetermined current value is relayed to ground-based personnel. The specification mentions real-time digital telemetry of the operational status of the boom deployment but does not adequately provide structural support for relaying this information to ground-based personnel. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 2 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 2 recites the function of the deployer but fails to structurally limit the claim upon which it depends. Claim 3 recites an inherent result of the structure in claim 1 but does not further limit claim 1. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 – 5 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hensley et al. (US 11,292,616). Regarding claim 1, Hensley et al. discloses a deployer for storing and deploying a boom (110-a and Abstract), the deployer comprising: a motor (290); a drum (112) having a circular cross section, the boom stowed in a stowed cross sectional configuration and wrapped around the drum (Fig. 2A), a first end of the boom attached to the drum (Fig. 2A); the motor attached to the drum for rotating the drum; and a tensioning mechanism (900 and 920) for applying radially inward directed forces on the folded and wrapped boom while the motor rotates the drum for deploying the boom from the deployer (col. 5, lines 19 – 28). Regarding claim 2, Hensley et al. discloses the deployer for mounting on a satellite, the boom for extending from the satellite and for supporting sensors or antennas (col. 4, lines 41 – 51). Regarding claim 3, Hensley et al. discloses that the radially inward forces limit blooming of the boom during deployment from the deployer (col. 5, lines 19 – 28). Regarding claim 4, Hensley et al. discloses a transition guide (static contoured support device 910) disposed at a location after the boom leaves the drum, wherein the transition guide defines an opening therein through which the boom passes, and wherein a shape of the opening transitions the boom from the stowed cross-sectional shape to a deployed cross-sectional shape. Regarding claim 5, Hensley et al. discloses that the deployed cross-sectional shape comprises one of a C-shaped cross-section (Fig. 3A), a rectangular cross-section, and an oblong cross-section. Regarding claim 9, Hensley et al. discloses a sensor (830-a) for determining a status of boom deployment and wherein boom deployment is controlled responsive to the sensor. Claim(s) 1, 3 – 8, 14, 16, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Murphey et al. (US 2020/0267029). Regarding claim 1, Murphey et al. discloses a deployer (120) for storing and deploying a boom (Abstract), the deployer comprising: a motor (601); a drum (121) having a circular cross section, the boom stowed in a stowed cross sectional configuration and wrapped around the drum, a first end of the boom attached to the drum (Fig. 2); the motor attached to the drum for rotating the drum; and a tensioning mechanism (103) for applying radially inward directed forces on the folded and wrapped boom while the motor rotates the drum for deploying the boom from the deployer (claim 13, Murphey et al.). Regarding claim 3, Murphy et al. discloses that the radially inward forces limit blooming of the boom during deployment from the deployer (inherent). Regarding claim 4, Murphey et al. discloses a transition guide (root end guide, Fig. 8A) disposed at a location after the boom leaves the drum, wherein the transition guide defines an opening therein through which the boom passes, and wherein a shape of the opening transitions the boom from the stowed cross-sectional shape to a deployed cross-sectional shape (paragraph [0127]). Regarding claim 5, Murphey et al. discloses that the deployed cross-sectional shape comprises one of a C-shaped cross-section, a rectangular cross-section, and an oblong cross-section (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 6, Murphey et al. discloses that the motor (601) is disposed within the drum (121), and wherein a motor shaft (613) extension extends into a hollow protrusion (hollow protrusion is shown in Fig. 6B, within which the motor shaft resides) extending from the drum, and wherein the motor shaft is received within and coupled to the hollow protrusion, such that the motor shaft and the hollow protrusion are concentric and rotation of the motor shaft extension rotates the drum. Regarding claim 7, Murphey et al. discloses a sleeve (603) encircling the motor, the drum encircling the sleeve (Fig. 6A), further comprising bearings (661) disposed between the sleeve and the drum such that the drum rotates around the sleeve. Regarding claim 8, Murphey et al. discloses that the sleeve is rigidly attached to a deployer structural member (631a, 631b) and the motor is rigidly attached to the sleeve. Regarding 14, Murphey et al. discloses that the drum further comprises a primary drum component (121), a secondary drum component (603), and a first (631a) and a second (631b) drum cheek, the secondary component for attaching to the primary component such that the drum presents the circular cross section, the first and second drum cheeks disposed on opposing circular faces of the drum for retaining the boom on the drum between the first and second drum cheeks (Figs. 6B and 2), and wherein fasteners (671) secure the secondary drum component to the primary drum component with the first end of the boom disposed between the primary drum component and the secondary drum component. Regarding claim 16, Murphey et al. discloses a microprocessor for controlling boom deployment responsive to a plurality of sensors (paragraph [0138] teaches a computer code, which comprises a microprocessor, controlling the boom deployer; the computer code would inherently comprise a sensor for boom deployment since it is able to control the deployer). Regarding claim 20, Murphey et al. discloses a deployer (120) for storing and deploying a boom, the deployer comprising: a motor (601); a drum (121) having a circular cross section, the boom stowed in a stowed cross-sectional configuration and wrapped around the drum (Fig. 2), a first end of the boom attached to the drum such that the boom enjoys limited movement relative to the drum; a motor shaft (613) coupled to the drum for rotating the drum; a sleeve (603) encircling the motor, the drum encircling the sleeve (Fig. 6A), the sleeve rigidly attached to a deployer structural member (631a, 631b), the motor rigidly attached to the sleeve; bearings (661) disposed between the sleeve and the drum such that the drum rotates around the sleeve; a transition guide (root end guide, Fig. 8A) disposed at a location after the boom leaves the drum, wherein the transition guide defines an opening therein through which the boom passes, and wherein a shape of the opening transitions the boom from the stowed cross-sectional shape to a deployed cross-sectional shape (paragraph [0127]); a tensioning mechanism (103) for applying radially inward directed forces on the folded and wrapped boom (claim 13, Murphey et al.) while the motor rotates the drum for deploying the boom from the deployer; sensors for tracking drum deployment, motor rotation, and motor current; and a microprocessor for controlling boom deployment responsive to the sensors (paragraph [0138] teaches a computer code, which comprises a microprocessor, controlling the boom deployer; the computer code would inherently comprise a sensor for boom deployment since it is able to control the deployer). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 17 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Murphey et al. in view of Menard et al. (CA 3070985). Regarding claim 17, Murphey et al. fails to teach that the plurality of sensors comprises an infrared sensor for monitoring boom deployment by tracking drum rotation, a motor sensor for tracking motor rotation, and a power supply current sensor for measuring motor current. However, Menard et al. discloses a motor for an actuator having an infrared sensor for monitoring and tracking motor rotation and a current sensor for measuring motor current (paragraph [00119]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed, with reasonable expectation of success, to use the sensors taught by Menard et al. in the boom deployment system of Murphey et al. in order to limit or prevent damage to the system caused by failure of the motor. Regarding claim 18, Murphey et al. as modified by Menard et al. discloses that motor rotation is halted responsive to a measured motor current value reaching or exceeding a predetermined maximum motor current value (paragraph [00119], Menard et al.). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10 – 13 and 15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. McGinnis (US 4,866893) – Extensible mast Daton-Lovett (US 2019/0103650) – Antenna assembly and related methods Turse et al. (US 2022/0042309) – Boom deployer devices, systems, and methods Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VALENTINA XAVIER whose telephone number is (571)272-9853. The examiner can normally be reached 10 am - 6:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Huson can be reached at (571) 270-5301. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VALENTINA XAVIER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12606315
AIRCRAFT
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12600496
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A SPACECRAFT DOCKING STATION
1y 11m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600463
AIRCRAFT RUDDER PEDAL WITH MECHANICAL KINEMATIC CHAIN
1y 6m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595039
AIR DIRECTING ARRANGEMENT FOR CONTROLLING AIRFLOW AT AN OUTLET
1y 9m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583629
Solar Sail for Orbital Maneuvers
2y 2m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+9.2%)
3y 2m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 749 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month