Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/025,498

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMICALLY ADJUSTING DISPLAY CONTENT AND PARAMETERS ON A DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Examiner
LEE, MICHAEL
Art Unit
2422
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Dk Crown Holdings Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
1038 granted / 1310 resolved
+21.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1348
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1310 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 21-40 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cannon et al. (2013/0344950). Regarding claim 21, Cannon discloses a system, comprising: one or more processors coupled to non-transitory memory, the one or more processors configured to: present content on a plurality of display regions of a display system, a subset of the plurality of display regions presenting broadcast content (note game windows 88 in Fig. 2 and 4a-4f); receive (par. 23, 40), from a client device, a wager identifying a live event (par. 68, 69, 70); determine, based on the wager, that a number of wagers identifying the live event within a predetermined time period has satisfies a threshold (par. 124, 127, 130); determine, based on the determination that the number of wagers identifying the live event within the predetermined time period satisfies the threshold, that at least one display region of the subset is presenting a broadcast of the live event (par. 68, 69, 70); and adjust, responsive to determining that the at least one display region is presenting the broadcast of the live event and based on the number of wagers, a display parameter of the at least one display region of the display system (par. 103, 114). Regarding claim 22, Cannon discloses the one or more processors are further configured to adjust a number of pixels assigned to the at least one display region (note par. 114). Regarding claim 23, Cannon discloses the one or more processors are further configured to determine the number of pixels based on a total number of wagers identifying the live event (note par. 127-129, 103). That is a “complimentary games” window 88 is displayed when a predetermined high level of wagering is placed at a predetermined time period. The player must continue to wager on and play at least one other game of chance in order to take advantage of the complimentary games. A particular individual gaming window 88 may flash, blink, become intensely illuminated, or grow in size, for example, as a prompt for a player to change or enter a wager. The size of the gaming window 88 is determined by the number of pixels. Regarding claim 24, Cannon discloses the one or more processors are further configured to select a position of the at least one display region (note par. 102). Regarding claim 25, Cannon discloses the one or more processors are further configured to determine that the wager causes a display region modification condition to be satisfied (note par. 127-129, 103). That is a “complimentary games” window 88 is displayed when a predetermined high level of wagering is placed at a predetermined time period. The player must continue to wager on and play at least one other game of chance in order to take advantage of the complimentary games. A particular individual gaming window 88 may flash, blink, become intensely illuminated, or grow in size, for example, as a prompt for a player to change or enter a wager. Regarding claim 26, Cannon discloses the one or more processors are further configured to adjust the at least one display region further based on the determination that the wager causes the display region modification condition to be satisfied (note par. 127-129, 103). That is a “complimentary games” window 88 is displayed when a predetermined high level of wagering is placed at a predetermined time period. The player must continue to wager on and play at least one other game of chance in order to take advantage of the complimentary games. A particular individual gaming window 88 may flash, blink, become intensely illuminated, or grow in size, for example, as a prompt for a player to change or enter a wager. Regarding claim 27, Cannon discloses the one or more processors are further configured to adjust a second display region of the plurality of display regions allocated to a second content item responsive to determining that the at least one display region is presenting the live event (note par. 103, 114-125). Regarding claim 28, Cannon discloses the one or more processors are further configured to decrease a number of pixels assigned to the second display region (note contracting in size feature in par. 114). Regarding claim 29, Cannon discloses the one or more processors are further configured to replace a second content item presented by the display system with the at least one display region (note par. 127-129). Regarding claim 30, Cannon discloses the one or more processors are further configured to cause the at least one display region to present the broadcast of the live event (note par. 68-70). Regarding claims 31-40, see similar rejections as set forth above. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL LEE whose telephone number 571-272-7349. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Thursday from 9:00 am to 6:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, John Miller, can be reached on 571-272-7353. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /MICHAEL LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2422
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 03, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599295
CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597276
DRIVING ASSISTANCE APPARATUS AND DRIVING ASSISTANCE METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581215
DARK CURRENT PATTERN ESTIMATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574472
Information Processing System And Information Processing Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573195
METHOD FOR EVALUATING PERFORMANCE OF IMAGE SIGNAL PROCESSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1310 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month