Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/025,601

MICROGRID STARTUP METHOD AND STARTUP PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Examiner
FIN, MICHAEL RUTLAND
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
495 granted / 621 resolved
+11.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
646
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
46.6%
+6.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
§112
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 621 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 13-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 13 and 15 recite “the command value” there is no command value present in this claim set. It appears typographical error resulting from parent the application’s claim set. Therefore Claims 13 and 14 are unclear. Applicant should cancel claim 13 and 15. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Carralero (US 20210175955) in view of Matsumoto et al. (US 20240297505) in view of Schurch et al. (US 2020034825). With respect to claims 11 Carralero teaches a startup method of microgrid configured by a plurality of inverter power supplies independently sharing a load (for example 112) and divided into a master (paragraph 0031) that starts up first and a slave (paragraph 0031) that starts up secondly and later, the startup method comprising: a master initial startup step of initially starting up the master in a CVCF mode (see CV paragraph 0031, 36, see constant frequency output from VCO/sine wave generator outputs 60 Hz output frequency); a slave startup (connected to master or grid paragraph 0031-32). Carralero does not teach the starting in VSG. Matsumoto teaches the known advantages of starting (see turn on) an inverter in a VSG mode (paragraph 0029-32). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify Carralero to start the slave in a VSG mode for the benefit of preventing cross currents. Carralero does not teach controlling the VSG mode to a CVCF mode. It is known to transition inverters from a start up to a steady state mode of operations. Schurch teaches the known transition to a VSG mode (paragraph 0030). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify Carralero to include the transitioning to VSG for the benefit of reducing instabilities (paragraph 0014). With respect to claims 12 Carralero teaches the voltage produced by the slave and grid voltage are matched (see matched to 110). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kustanovich et al. Virtual Synchronous machines with fast current loops and secondary control. With respect to claim 16 Kustanovich teaches a startup method of microgrid (page 1 col. 2 paragraph 4 see “MG”) configured by a plurality of inverter (see inverters page 1 col. 2 paragraph 5, further see VSMs VSM-1 and VSM-2) power supplies independently sharing a load (loads connected to grid) and divided into a master that starts up first and a slave that starts up secondly and later, the startup (see for example black start page 2 col. 1 paragraph 1) method comprising: a master (VSM-1 is started first and therefore the master) initial startup step of initially starting up the master in a VSG mode (see page 8 VSM-1 start at t=0); a phase detection step of detecting a phase (see theta.sub.g page 3 see use of gird measurements v from grid in Fig. 2 ) of grid voltage; and a slave (VSM-2 is started up second and therefore the slave) startup step (VSM-2 start t=20) of starting up the slave in a VSG mode based on (each inverter inputs grid phase measurements, VSM-2 occurs after the start of VMS-1 and there the measurements at VSM-2 are based on the phase detected from 1) the phase detected in the phase detection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michael Fin whose telephone number is (571)272-5921. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at 571-272-7429. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MICHAEL FIN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2836 /MICHAEL R. FIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592580
Power Module And Power Distribution System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12573872
CONTROL OF STATIC TRANSFER SWITCH SYSTEM FOR VOLT-SECOND BALANCE TRANSFER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12562587
SMART METER SOCKET ADAPTER FOR CONNECTING BATTER ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556028
UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12556033
QUICK AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+6.6%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 621 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month