Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/025,727

LOAD CONTROL DEVICE HAVING A REDUCED LEAKAGE THROUGH GROUND

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Examiner
BARNETT, JOEL
Art Unit
2849
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lutron Technology Company LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
346 granted / 431 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
467
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
50.0%
+10.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 431 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 16 January 2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 6 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2012/0253535 by Newman et al. (Newman hereinafter) in view of US 2013/0307586 by O’Connell et al. (O’Connell hereinafter). Regarding claim 6, Newman discloses a method to control an electric load device [see at least Figure 4, (408)], comprising: maintaining, by electric load control circuitry [see at least Figure 4, (414)], a controllably conductive device [see at least Figure 4, (410)] in a non-conductive state [see at least paragraph 0057]; wherein the controllably conductive device reversibly transitions between a conductive state and the non-conductive state [see at least paragraphs 0026 and 0041], the controllably conductive device electrically coupled between a first terminal [see at least Figure 4, (402)] and a second terminal [see at least Figure 4, (406)] causing, by the electric load control circuitry, a first zero-cross detect circuit [see at least Figure 4, (420)]; receiving, by the electric load control circuitry, from the first zero-cross detect circuit an input signal indicative of a presence or an absence of an AC voltage [see at least paragraph 0053]; and responsive to the receipt, from the first zero-cross detect circuit, of the input signal indicative of the presence of the AC voltage at the first zero-cross detect circuit: causing, by the electric load control circuitry, the first controllable switch to remain in the conductive state [see at least paragraph 0050]; and receiving, by the electric load control circuitry, an AC source voltage zero crossing input signal from the first zero-cross detect circuit [see at least paragraph 0053]. Newman fails to explicitly disclose the zero-cross detect circuit. However, O’Connell discloses a zero-cross detect circuit with reversible switches [see at least Figure 4, (90), (92) or (82)] connected to ground [see at least Figure 4, (62)]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to utilize a zero-cross detect circuit with the above configuration as it is a known circuit structure. Thus, allowing for using a produced and available part. Regarding claim 11, Newman discloses a non-transitory, machine readable, storage device [see at least paragraph 0041] that includes instructions that, when executed by electric load control circuitry [see at least Figure 4, (400)], causes the electric load control circuitry to: maintain a controllably conductive device [see at least Figure 4, (410)] in a non-conductive state [see at least paragraph 0057]; wherein the controllably conductive device reversibly transitions between a conductive state and the non-conductive state [see at least paragraphs 0026 and 0041], the controllably conductive device electrically coupled between a first terminal [see at least Figure 4, (402)] and a second terminal [see at least Figure 4, (406)] a first zero-cross detect circuit [see at least Figure 4, (420)]; receive from the first zero-cross detect circuit an input signal indicative of a presence or an absence of an AC voltage [see at least paragraph 0053]; and responsive to the receipt, from the first zero-cross detect circuit, of the input signal indicative of the presence of the AC voltage at the first zero-cross detect circuit: remain in the conductive state [see at least paragraph 0050]; and receive an AC source voltage zero crossing input signal from the first zero- cross detect circuit [see at least paragraph 0053]. Newman fails to explicitly disclose the zero-cross detect circuit. However, O’Connell discloses a zero-cross detect circuit with reversible switches [see at least Figure 4, (90), (92) or (82)] connected to ground [see at least Figure 4, (62)]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to utilize a zero-cross detect circuit with the above configuration as it is a known circuit structure. Thus, allowing for using a produced and available part. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2012/0253535 by Newman et al. (Newman hereinafter) in view of US 2013/0307586 by O’Connell et al. (O’Connell hereinafter) in further view of US 2007/0188025 by Keagy et al. (Keagy hereinafter). Regarding claim 1, Newman discloses a two-wire electric load control device [see at least Figure 4, (400)], comprising: a controllably conductive device [see at least Figure 4, (410)] reversibly transitionable between a conductive state and a non-conductive state [see at least paragraphs 0026 and 0041], the controllably conductive device electrically coupled between a first terminal [see at least Figure 4, (402)] and a second terminal [see at least Figure 4, (406)]; a first detect circuit [see at least Figure 4, (420)]; control circuitry operatively coupled to the controllably conductive device [see at least Figure 4, (414)], the first detect circuit, the control circuitry to: maintain the controllably conductive device in the non-conductive state [see at least Figure 4, (410)]; receive, from the first detect circuit an input signal indicative of a presence or an absence of an AC voltage [see at least paragraph 0053]; and responsive to the receipt, from the first detect circuit, of an input signal indicative of the presence of the AC voltage at the first detect circuit: remain in the conductive state [see at least paragraph 0050]; and receive, from the first detect circuit, an AC source voltage zero crossing input signal [see at least paragraph 0053]. Newman fails to explicitly disclose the zero-cross detect circuit. However, O’Connell discloses a zero-cross detect circuit with reversible switches [see at least Figure 4, (90), (92) or (82)] connected to ground [see at least Figure 4, (62)]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to utilize a zero-cross detect circuit with the above configuration as it is a known circuit structure. Thus, allowing for using a produced and available part. Newman in view of O’Connell fails to teach a second detect circuit. However, Keagy discloses further detect circuits [see at least Figure 6A, (636) or (638)] after a zero-crossing detector [see at least Figure 6A, (526)]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to include a second detect circuit in order to further control aspects of the circuit. Thus, allowing for more refinement in dimming of a light and allowing for better control. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5, 7-10 and 12-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: claims 2, 7 and 12 contain the limitation of a second zero-cross detection circuit with the first zero-cross detection circuit being on the input side of the controllably conductive device and the second zero-cross detection circuit being on the output side of the controllably conductive device. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Chau et al. (US 2015/0295505) discloses an AC load detection circuit. Salvestrini (US 2014/0239842) discloses a load control device with a similar construction. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOEL BARNETT whose telephone number is (571)272-2879. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at (571) 272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOEL BARNETT/Examiner, Art Unit 2836 /DANIEL CAVALLARI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603527
ENERGY COLLECTION DEVICE AND RECTIFIER CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597798
REDUNDANT POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589675
FUEL CELL VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586935
METHODS OF DELIVERING POWER TO COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK EQUIPMENT AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND COAXIAL CABLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583363
ELECTRIC VEHICLE EMPLOYING FUEL CELLS AND RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.5%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 431 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month