Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/026,155

TERMINATION CIRCUIT WITH AMPLITUDE AND PHASE IMBALANCE-TUNING TECHNIQUE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Priority
Feb 01, 2024 — provisional 63/627,811
Examiner
YALDO, ABIGAIL AMIR
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
53 granted / 57 resolved
+33.0% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
72
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§102
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 57 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 2-5, 10-13 and 15-19 depend upon rejected claims 1 and 14 and inherit the deficiency thereby. Claims 1, Line 1; and Claim 14, Line 1, “a termination circuit” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to what attributes or aspects make this circuit as claimed function as a “termination circuit”, especially since the claimed features do not appear to establish any nexus with the “termination circuit”, thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim difficult to ascertain. Claim 6, Line 4, “an amplitude tuning circuit or a phase tuning circuit” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to how the “reconfigurable tuning circuit” can act as an “amplitude tuning circuit” or “phase tuning circuit” when claim 1, from which this claim depends, defines each plurality of “first tuning circuit” and “second tuning circuit” to comprise both the “amplitude tuning circuit” and the “phase tuning circuit”, thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim unclear. Claims 7, Lines 1-2 and all further recitations; Claim 8, Lines 1-2; and Claim 9, Lines 1-2, “the reconfigurable tuning circuit” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to which of the “reconfigurable tuning circuit”, as previously defined in claim 6, from which these claims depend, is intended to reference to (i.e. from the first tuning circuit, from the second tuning circuit, etc.), thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim unclear. Claim 8, Line 3, “the amplitude tuning circuit” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to which recitation of “amplitude tuning circuit” from claim 1 or from claim 6, from which this claim depends, this “the amplitude tuning circuit” is intended reference to, thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim unclear. Claim 9, Line 3, “the phase tuning circuit” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to which recitation of “phase tuning circuit” from claim 1 or from claim 6, from which this claim depends, this “the phase tuning circuit” is intended reference to, thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim unclear. Appropriate correction is required. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The most pertinent prior art is Patel (US 11569555), which teaches an antenna tuning circuit, phase shifters, and a system-on-chip. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABIGAIL YALDO whose telephone number is (703)756-1784. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7 AM - 4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren Baltzell can be reached at (571) 272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABIGAIL AMIR YALDO/Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676600
TWO-STAGE SOLID-STATE MATCH
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671162
BRANCH-LINE COUPLER
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12657501
Precision Ferrite-Based Electromagnetic Signal Circulators for Quantum Computing Systems
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660083
VERTICAL CONDUCTIVE STRUCTURE TRANSITION IMPEDANCE OPTIMIZATION
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12627281
MULTI-LEVEL DIGITAL STEP ATTENUATOR AND DIGITAL STEP ATTENUATION DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.0%)
2y 4m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 57 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month