Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/026,206

Integrated Coordination Of Care

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Examiner
COBANOGLU, DILEK B
Art Unit
3687
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Cerner Innovation Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
33%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 9m
To Grant
61%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 33% of cases
33%
Career Allow Rate
163 granted / 492 resolved
-18.9% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 9m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
549
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
35.3%
-4.7% vs TC avg
§103
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 492 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A preliminary amendment has been received on 07/01/2025. Claims 1-20 remain pending in this application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. Step 1: Claims 1-7 are drawn to a non-transitory media which is within the four statutory categories (i.e. manufacture). Claims 8-14 are drawn to a system which is within the four statutory categories (i.e. machine). Claims 15-20 are drawn to a method which is within the four statutory categories (i.e. process). Step 2A, Prong 1: The independent claims, 1, 8 and 15 recite: “selecting, via at least one processor of a set of hardware processors associated with one or both of a user device and an interface for a longitudinal plan system, a plan template from a plurality of plan templates associated with the longitudinal plan system, the plurality of plan templates searchable via the interface at the user device for a particular health concept that corresponds to a health concern, a social concern, a goal, and/or an activity associated with a patient, wherein a patient identifier corresponding to the patient is attached to or included in the plan template; determining, via the set of hardware processors, that a code corresponding to a problem documented in an electronic medical record (EMR) of the patient is contained in a concept code for a health concern identified by the particular health concept, wherein: based on the code being contained in the concept code: (a) a health concern data item corresponding to the health concern is created for the patient; (b) information corresponding to the health concern is written in the EMR of the patient; and (c) at least a portion of a clinician workflow, associated with the health concern, is embedded in the EMR of the patient, and wherein an electronic access, by a patient device via a patient application programmable interface (API), is created to enable modifying by the patient device of one or several information elements selected from a group comprising the EMR of the patient and the clinician workflow of the clinician; and initiating, via the set of hardware processors, a modification of the one or several information elements based at least partially on data associated with the patient identifier”. The limitations of “selecting, via at least one processor of a set of hardware processors associated with one or both of a user device and an interface for a longitudinal plan system, a plan template from a plurality of plan templates associated with the longitudinal plan system…”, “determining, via the set of hardware processors, that a code corresponding to a problem documented in an electronic medical record (EMR) of the patient is contained in a concept code for a health concern identified by the particular health concept”, and “based on the code being contained in the concept code: (a) a health concern data item corresponding to the health concern is created for the patient; (b) information corresponding to the health concern is written in the EMR of the patient; and (c) at least a portion of a clinician workflow, associated with the health concern, is embedded in the EMR of the patient” correspond to an abstract idea of “certain methods of organizing human activity” with a recitation of generic hardware processors. This is a method of managing interactions between people, such as user following rules and instructions. The mere nominal recitation of a generic processor and generic network devices does not take the claim out of the methods of organizing human interactions grouping. Thus, the claims recite an abstract idea. The current specification recites “The system comprises: a processor; and a computer storage medium storing computer-usable instructions that, when used by the processor, cause the processor to: enable a clinician to select a plan template from a plurality of plan templates; attach the plan template to a patient identifier corresponding to the patient; integrate the plan template with a wellness plan of the patient; and enable the patient to update the wellness plan via a portal.” in [0028] and “The remote computers 108 might be personal computers, servers, routers, network PCs, peer devices, other common network nodes, or the like and might comprise some or all of the elements described above in relation to the control server 102. The devices can be personal digital assistants or other like devices.” in [0034]. Therefore, the processor recited in the claims is directed to a generic computing component. Claims 2-7, 9-14 and 16-20 are ultimately dependent from claims 1, 8, 15 and include all the limitations of claims 1, 8, 15. Therefore, claims 2-7, 9-14 and 16-20 recite the same abstract idea. Claims 2-7, 9-14 and 16-20 describe a further limitation regarding the basis for determining a code corresponding to a problem is contained in the medical record of the patient. These are all just further describing the abstract idea recited in claims 1, 8, 15, without adding significantly more. Step 2A, Prong 2: This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application. In particular, claims recite the additional elements that are shown in bolded style below: Claim 1. One or more non-transitory media having instructions that, when executed by one or more hardware processors, cause the one or more hardware processors to facilitate a plurality of operations, the operations comprising: selecting, via at least one processor of the one or more hardware processors associated with one or both of a user device and an interface for a longitudinal plan system, a plan template from a plurality of plan templates associated with the longitudinal plan system, the plurality of plan templates searchable via the interface at the user device for a particular health concept that corresponds to a health concern, a social concern, a goal, and/or an activity associated with a patient, wherein a patient identifier corresponding to the patient is attached to or included in the plan template; determining, via the one or more hardware processors, that a code corresponding to a problemdocumented in an electronic medical record (EMR) of the patient is contained in a concept code for a health concern identified by the particular health concept wherein: based on the code being contained in the concept code: health concern data item corresponding to the health concern is created for the patient information corresponding to the health concern is written in the EMR of the patient; and at least a portion of a clinician workflow, associated with the health concern, is embedded in the EMR of the patient, and wherein an electronic access, by a patient device via a patient application programmable interface is created to enable modifying by the patient device of one or several information elements selected from a group comprising the EMR of the patient and the clinician workflow of the clinician; and initiating, via the one or more hardware processors, a modification of the one or several information elements is based at least partially on data associated with the patient identifier. 2. (New) The one or more non-transitory media of claim 1, wherein the modification is initiated by the at least one processor at the user device. 3. (New) The one or more non-transitory media of claim 1, wherein an additional electronic access, by a set of provider care-team devices, is created to enable modifying of the EMR of the patient. 4. (New) The one or more non-transitory media of claim 3, wherein the set of provider care- team devices includes the user device. 5. (New) The one or more non-transitory media of claim 3, wherein the additional electronic access further enables modifying of the clinician workflow of the clinician. 6. (New) The one or more non-transitory media of claim 1, wherein the electronic access comprises a second electronic access, and wherein a first electronic access is created to enable modifying by provider care-team devices of one or more information elements selected from the group comprising the EMR of the patient and the clinician workflow of the clinician. 7. (New) The one or more non-transitory media of claim 6, wherein the first electronic access enables modifying, by the provider care-team devices and via at least one of the interface and a personnel API, of the one or more information elements. 8. (New) A system having one or more hardware processors configured to facilitate a plurality of operations, the operations comprising: selecting, via at least one processor of the one or more hardware processors associated with one or both of a user device and an interface for a longitudinal plan system, a plan template from a plurality of plan templates associated with the longitudinal plan system, the plurality of plan templates searchable via the interface at the user device for a particular health concept that corresponds to a health concern, a social concern, a goal, and/or an activity associated with a patient, wherein a patient identifier corresponding to the patient is attached to or included in the plan template; determining, via the one or more hardware processors, that a code corresponding to a problem documented in an electronic medical record (EMR) of the patient is contained in a concept code for a health concern identified by the particular health concept, wherein: based on the code being contained in the concept code: (a) a health concern data item corresponding to the health concern is created for the patient; (b) information corresponding to the health concern is written in the EMR of the patient; and (c) at least a portion of a clinician workflow, associated with the health concern, is embedded in the EMR of the patient, and wherein an electronic access, by a patient device via a patient application programmable interface (API), is created to enable modifying by the patient device of one or several information elements selected from a group comprising the EMR of the patient and the clinician workflow of the clinician; and initiating, via the one or more hardware processors, a modification of the one or several information elements based at least partially on data associated with the patient identifier. 9. (New) The system of claim 8, wherein the modification is initiated by the at least one processor at the user device. 10. (New) The system of claim 8, wherein an additional electronic access, by a set of provider care-team devices, is created to enable modifying of the EMR of the patient. 11. (New) The system of claim 10, wherein the set of provider care-team devices includes the user device. 12. (New) The system of claim 10, wherein the additional electronic access further enables modifying of the clinician workflow of the clinician. 13. (New) The system of claim 8, wherein the electronic access comprises a second electronic access, and wherein a first electronic access is created to enable modifying by provider care- team devices of one or more information elements selected from the group comprising the EMR of the patient and the clinician workflow of the clinician. 14. (New) The system of claim 13, wherein the first electronic access enables modifying, by the provider care-team devices and via at least one of the interface and a personnel API, of the one or more information elements. 15. (New) A computer-implemented method, comprising: selecting, via at least one processor of a set of hardware processors associated with one or both of a user device and an interface for a longitudinal plan system, a plan template from a plurality of plan templates associated with the longitudinal plan system, the plurality of plan templates searchable via the interface at the user device for a particular health concept that corresponds to a health concern, a social concern, a goal, and/or an activity associated with a patient, wherein a patient identifier corresponding to the patient is attached to or included in the plan template; determining, via the set of hardware processors, that a code corresponding to a problem documented in an electronic medical record (EMR) of the patient is contained in a concept code for a health concern identified by the particular health concept, wherein: based on the code being contained in the concept code: (a) a health concern data item corresponding to the health concern is created for the patient; (b) information corresponding to the health concern is written in the EMR of the patient; and (c) at least a portion of a clinician workflow, associated with the health concern, is embedded in the EMR of the patient, and wherein an electronic access, by a patient device via a patient application programmable interface (API), is created to enable modifying by the patient device of one or several information elements selected from a group comprising the EMR of the patient and the clinician workflow of the clinician; and initiating, via the set of hardware processors, a modification of the one or several information elements based at least partially on data associated with the patient identifier. 16. (New) The computer-implemented method of claim 15, wherein the modification is initiated by the at least one processor at the user device. 17. (New) The computer-implemented method of claim 15, wherein an additional electronic access, by a set of provider care-team devices, is created to enable modifying of the EMR of the patient, and wherein the set of provider care-team devices includes the user device. 18. (New) The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the additional electronic access further enables modifying of the clinician workflow of the clinician. 19. (New) The computer-implemented method of claim 15, wherein the electronic access comprises a second electronic access, and wherein a first electronic access is created to enable modifying by provider care-team devices of one or more information elements selected from the group comprising the EMR of the patient and the clinician workflow of the clinician. 20. (New) The computer-implemented method of claim 19, wherein the first electronic access enables modifying, by the provider care-team devices and via at least one of the interface and a personnel API, of the one or more information elements. Thes additional elements are directed to are hardware and software elements, these limitations are not enough to qualify as “practical application” being recited in the claims along with the abstract idea since these elements are merely invoked as a tool to apply instructions of the abstract idea in a particular technological environment, and mere instructions to apply/implement/automate an abstract idea in a particular technological environment and merely limiting the use of an abstract idea to a particular field or technological environment do not provide practical application for an abstract idea (MPEP 2106.05(f) & (h)). The processor in the claim steps is recited at a high-level of generality (i.e., as a generic processor performing a generic computer function of determining a code corresponding to a problem, creating, writing and modifying data in the EMR) such that it amounts no more than mere instructions to apply the exception using a generic computer component. Accordingly, these additional elements do not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application because it does not impose any meaningful limits on practicing the abstract idea. Accordingly, these additional elements do not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application because they do not impose any meaningful limits on practicing the abstract idea. The claims are directed to an abstract idea. Step 2B: The claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception. As discussed above with respect to integration of the abstract idea into a practical application, the additional element of using a processor to perform determining, creating, accessing, embedding, modifying steps amounts to no more than mere instructions to apply the exception using a generic computer component. Mere instructions to apply an exception using a generic computer component cannot provide an inventive concept. The claims are not patent eligible. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DILEK B COBANOGLU whose telephone number is (571)272-8295. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Obeid Mamon can be reached at (571) 270-1813. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DILEK B COBANOGLU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3687
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12574434
METHOD OF HUB COMMUNICATION, PROCESSING, DISPLAY, AND CLOUD ANALYTICS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12500948
METHOD OF HUB COMMUNICATION, PROCESSING, DISPLAY, AND CLOUD ANALYTICS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12482562
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AND DISPLAYING PATIENT DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12380972
DATA COMMAND CENTER VISUAL DISPLAY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 05, 2025
Patent 12334223
LEARNING APPARATUS, MENTAL STATE SEQUENCE PREDICTION APPARATUS, LEARNING METHOD, MENTAL STATE SEQUENCE PREDICTION METHOD AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 17, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
33%
Grant Probability
61%
With Interview (+27.9%)
4y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 492 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month