Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/026,923

SPORTS HELMET

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Examiner
ANNIS, KHALED
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Ruroc Ip Holdings Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
491 granted / 870 resolved
-13.6% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+50.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
894
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.2%
+0.2% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 870 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. DETAILED ACTION This is in response to an amendment filed on 2/17/2026 in which claims 1-19 were presented for examination. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/17/2025 was considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species A (Figs. 1-3 and 6) in the reply filed on 2/17/2026 is acknowledged. The applicant argument was found persuasive, therefore, the election requirement is hereby withdrawn. Claim Objections Claims 2-19 recite “A full-face helmet” change to –The full-face helmet-- objected. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 10-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claims 10-17 are indefinite because it is unclear if the helmet has the magnet system with the clip system at the same time or that is a separate system meaning the magnet system OR the clip system. The figures points to having only one system. If they are one or the other then the clip cannot depend from claim 1 which is directed to the magnet system only. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 6 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JWA (U.S. Pub. No. 2020/0178639 A1). Regarding claim 1, Jwa discloses a full-face helmet (See Fig. 1) (capable) for use in sport comprising a rigid outer shell (200) for fitting about a top, back and sides of a user's head (because as shown in Fig. 1 it is a full head helmet), a detachable chin guard (300) (capable) for partially covering the user's face (when worn), the detachable chin guard (300) being magnetically connected to sides of the rigid outer shell (see Figs.2-3 and para. 0061 describing the use of magnets 1300 and 1400), at least one magnet being mounted on each side of the rigid outer shell and chin guard (1300, 1400 as described in para. 0061 and shown in Figs. 2-3), in which the at least one magnet on each side of the rigid outer shell is provided on an outer surface of each side of the rigid outer shell (See para. 0061 and Fig. 3), and in which the at least one magnet on each side of the chin guard is provided on an inner surface of the chin guard (See para. 0061 and Fig. 3). Regarding claim 6, Jwa discloses a full-face helmet in which the at least one magnet of the chin guard is in a complementary position to a magnet on a corresponding side of the rigid outer shell (See Fig. 3 and para. 0061). Regarding claim 19, Jwa discloses a full-face helmet the recitation “in which a portion of edge surfaces of the chin guard and rigid outer shell abut to enable transfer of impact forces between them” is considered functional, the device of the prior art discloses substantially all the claimed structural elements of claim 1 and therefore it is fully capable to perform the claimed function. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5 and 7-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered (See PTO-892) pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHALED ANNIS whose telephone number is (571)270-1563. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8 am-5 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alissa Tompkins can be reached at 571-272-3425. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHALED ANNIS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593886
Energy Absorbing Protective Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575633
ROTATING BODY FIXING MEANS FOR HELMET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569052
ARTICLE HOLDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569023
ADJUSTABLE HELMET LINER SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566049
BODY ARMOR SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+50.5%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 870 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month