Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/027,151

INFORMATION INDICATION METHOD, REPEATER AND NETWORK DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Aug 10, 2022 — continuation of PCTCN2022111451
Examiner
FERGUSON, KEITH
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
1FINITY Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
660 granted / 765 resolved
+26.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
778
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 765 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 11, claim limitation “the repeater does not expect to be indicated a beam which is not the same as the first beam over the first time” is not disclosed in applicant’s specification disclosure. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4,6 and 11-14 are is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Liu (WO 2022082774 A1). The claimed invention reads on Liu as follows: Regarding claim 1, Liu discloses repeater (repeater and/or relay and/or wireless backhaul device) (fig. 1, fig. 2, page 16 lines 18-36, page 24 lines 16-30, fig. 8 and page 32, 3rd paragraph), comprising: a receiver (transceiver) (fig. number 820, fig. 2 S202, page 24 lines 23-24 and page 32, third paragraph) configured to receive first information from a network device (fig. 2 S202 and page 24 lines 23-24), the first information being used to indicate a first time and/or a first beam (i.e. The first indication information may directly or indirectly indicate the access beam to be used by the relay node to forward the signal in one or more time units, for example, an uplink access beam and/or a downlink access beam. The access beams corresponding to each time unit may be the same or different. In this embodiment of the present application, the time unit may be a time slot, a symbol, a frame, a subframe, or the like. For example, the first indication information indicates the downlink access beam of the relay node in the first time slot)(Page 25, 1st paragraph), the first beam being denoted by a first beam index (i.e. the access beam index may be used to identify different access beams, that is, the content included in the first indication information is the index of the access beam)(page 27, 4th paragraph), the first time comprising at least one time unit, the time unit being a slot and/or a symbol )(Page 25, 1st paragraph); and processor circuitry (fig. 8 number 810 and page 32, 3rd paragraph) configured to determine to apply the first beam for reception or transmission on an access link over the first time at least according to the first information (i.e. the first indication information indicates the downlink access beam of the relay node in the first time slot, and the relay node selects the downlink access beam for downlink reception in the first time slot according to the first indication information. For another example, the first indication information indicates the relay node's uplink access beam in the second time slot, (Page 25, 1st paragraph) and the relay node can determine whether each time unit or each time subunit should be used for uplink forwarding or downlink forwarding through the remaining information (page 25 lines 26-31). Regarding claim 2, Liu discloses the first information is carried by media access control (MAC) control element (CE), and/or radio resource control (RRC) signaling, and/or, physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) (i.e. the first indication information may be carried in RRC signaling or MAC CE or DCI. The above one or more fields may be fields already defined by RRC signaling or MAC CE, or may be newly defined RRC signaling or MAC CE)(page 27, 3rd paragraph). Regarding claims 3-4, Liu discloses the receiver is further configured to receive (via an indicate) second information (time unit for downlink transmission) (page 25, lines 18-32) from the network device (i.e. via the first indication information in S202, i.e. The network device sends first indication information to the relay node, and the relay node receives the first indication information, page 24, 5th paragraph, In implementation, the relay node can determine whether each time unit or each time subunit should be used for uplink forwarding or downlink forwarding through the remaining information. Exemplarily, the relay node may determine the uplink and downlink configuration of each time unit or each time subunit by using the TDD configuration information)( page 24, 5th paragraph and page 25, lines 18-32), the second information including TDD uplink/downlink configuration information and is carried by a radio resource control (RRC) signaling (i.e. the first indication information may be carried in RRC signaling,(i.e. first indication information sent from the network device) (page 27, 3rd paragraph). Regarding claim 6, Liu discloses a same beam is used by the repeater for transmissions and receptions on the access link (i.e. the first indication information may instruct the first node (relay/repeater) to use the same access beam for uplink reception of the access link and for downlink transmission of the access link) (abstract and page 3, 4th paragraph). Regarding claim 11, Liu discloses the repeater does not expect to be indicated a beam which is not the same as the first beam over the first time (i.e. the first indication information may instruct the first node (relay/repeater) to use the same access beam for uplink reception of the access link and for downlink transmission of the access link over a first time unit) (abstract and page 3, 4th paragraph). Regarding claim 12, Liu discloses an indication of the first beam is based on a beam index, the beam index is a serial number of beams of an AC link (a beam index, a beam group index, and a beam index within a beam group , sub-beam group index in beam group, beam index in sub-beam group in beam group, number of beams (page 5, last paragraph). Regarding claim 13, Liu discloses a method (fig. 2) by performing a repeater (repeater and/or relay) (fig. 2, page 24 lines 16-30), comprising: a receiver (transceiver) (fig. number 820, fig. 2 S202, page 24 lines 23-24 and page 32, third paragraph) configured to receive first information from a network device (fig. 2 S202 and page 24 lines 23-24), the first information being used to indicate a first time and/or a first beam (i.e. The first indication information may directly or indirectly indicate the access beam to be used by the relay node to forward the signal in one or more time units, for example, an uplink access beam and/or a downlink access beam. The access beams corresponding to each time unit may be the same or different. In this embodiment of the present application, the time unit may be a time slot, a symbol, a frame, a subframe, or the like. For example, the first indication information indicates the downlink access beam of the relay node in the first time slot)(Page 25, 1st paragraph), the first beam being denoted by a first beam index (i.e. the access beam index may be used to identify different access beams, that is, the content included in the first indication information is the index of the access beam)(page 27, 4th paragraph), the first time comprising at least one time unit, the time unit being a slot and/or a symbol )(Page 25, 1st paragraph); and processor circuitry (fig. 8 number 810 and page 32, 3rd paragraph) configured to determine to apply the first beam for reception or transmission on an access link over the first time at least according to the first information (i.e. the first indication information indicates the downlink access beam of the relay node in the first time slot, and the relay node selects the downlink access beam for downlink reception in the first time slot according to the first indication information. For another example, the first indication information indicates the relay node's uplink access beam in the second time slot, (Page 25, 1st paragraph) and the relay node can determine whether each time unit or each time subunit should be used for uplink forwarding or downlink forwarding through the remaining information (page 25 lines 26-31). Regarding claim 14, Liu discloses network device (base station)(fig. 10 number 1000 and page 38 and 4th paragraph) comprising: a transmitter (transceiver) (fig. 10 number 1010 and page 38, 5th paragraph) configured to transmit first information to a repeater (fig. 2 S202 and page 24 lines 23-24), the first information being used to indicate a first time and/or a first beam (i.e. The first indication information may directly or indirectly indicate the access beam to be used by the relay node to forward the signal in one or more time units, for example, an uplink access beam and/or a downlink access beam. The access beams corresponding to each time unit may be the same or different. In this embodiment of the present application, the time unit may be a time slot, a symbol, a frame, a subframe, or the like. For example, the first indication information indicates the downlink access beam of the relay node in the first time slot)(Page 25, 1st paragraph), the first beam being denoted by a first beam index (i.e. the access beam index may be used to identify different access beams, that is, the content included in the first indication information is the index of the access beam)(page 27, 4th paragraph), the first time comprising at least one time unit, the time unit being a slot and/or a symbol )(Page 25, 1st paragraph); and processor circuitry (fig. 8 number 810 and page 32, 3rd paragraph) configured to determine to apply the first beam for reception or transmission on an access link over the first time at least according to the first information (i.e. the first indication information indicates the downlink access beam of the relay node in the first time slot, and the relay node selects the downlink access beam for downlink reception in the first time slot according to the first indication information. For another example, the first indication information indicates the relay node's uplink access beam in the second time slot, (Page 25, 1st paragraph) and the relay node can determine whether each time unit or each time subunit should be used for uplink forwarding or downlink forwarding through the remaining information (page 25 lines 26-31). Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claims 5 and 7-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 6. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 5, the prior art of record fails to teach or suggest alone, or in combination the second information is used to indicate that the first time comprises flexible time unit; the flexible time unit in the first time not being used to receive and/or transmit on the access link. Regarding claim 7, the prior art of record fails to teach or suggest alone, or in combination the receiver is further configured to receive third information from the network device, the third information being used to indicate a second time and a second beam used for transmission or reception on the access link, the second beam is denoted by a second beam index, the second time and the first time at least partially overlapping, and the processor circuitry is further configured to determine to apply the first beam for transmission or reception on the access link in the first time, at least based on the first information and the third information. Conclusion 6. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. He et al. (US 2025/0331026) discloses beamforming information for network-controlled repeaters. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEITH FERGUSON whose telephone number is (571)272-7865. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7 am -3 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wesley L Kim can be reached at (571) 272-7867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEITH FERGUSON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750153
MEASURING A RESISTANCE AGAINST AN ADVERSARIAL ATTACK AND ESTIMATING A PARAMETER OF AN INTERFERENCE SOURCE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750131
NETWORK NODE, TERMINAL, AND METHODS THEREIN
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750154
Adaptive Jammer Detection
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12732302
SYSTEM, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR DETECTION OF GNSS JAMMERS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732911
ACCESS REPEATER DEVICE AND METHOD OF DETECTING DISTRIBUTION OF UEs BASED ON INDUCED UE RESPONSE
11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+8.5%)
2y 3m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 765 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month