Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 18, 2026
Application No. 19/027,153

METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND DEVICES FOR DESIGNING AND MANUFACTURING A SPINAL ROD

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Oct 18, 2013 — FR 1360208 +9 more
Examiner
GILLIARD, DELOMIA L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Medicrea International
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
988 granted / 1103 resolved
+29.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1115
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.2%
+12.2% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1103 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 15/024150, filed on March 23, 2016. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1 and 15 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 19 of U.S. Patent No. 12257000 B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims in the instant application are broader. The claims are anticipated by the patent as described below and therefore this is an obviousness-type double patenting. 19027153 12257000 1. An electronic interface configured to: Claim 19. an electronic interface configured for access one or more representations of a vertebral column of a patient; accessing one or more images of the vertebral column of a patient; calculate curvatures of a first curved segment and a second curved segment of the vertebral column based on the one or more representations; calculating curvatures of a first curved segment and a second curved segment of the vertebral column represented in the one or more images; generate a spinal rod specification for use by a manufacturing apparatus to manufacture an implantable spinal rod, the generated specification based on the calculated curvatures; generating a patient-specific spinal rod specification based on the calculated curvatures, the generated spinal rod specification configured for use by a manufacturing apparatus to manufacture an implantable spinal rod comprising the calculated curvatures And provide, to a practitioner, information based on the spinal rod specification, providing, to a practitioner, information based on the patient-specific spinal rod specification, allowing the practitioner to manufacture the implantable spinal rod according to the specification. allowing the practitioner to manufacture the implantable spinal rod according to the generated spinal rod specification. Similar mapping applied to claim 15 over claim 19 of U.S. Patent No. 12257000 B2 Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DELOMIA L GILLIARD whose telephone number is (571)272-1681. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Villecco can be reached at (571) 272-7319. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DELOMIA L GILLIARD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738086
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731431
IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732635
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CODING/DECODING IMAGE USING INTRA PREDICTION
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12718352
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A DECOR SHEET FOR DECORATIVE PANEL
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12718177
OPERATION SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION DEVICE, OPERATION SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM, OPERATION SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.4%)
1y 12m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1103 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month