Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/027,373

Footwear and Footwear Components Including Uppers with Fluid-Filled Bladder Chambers

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Examiner
KAVANAUGH, JOHN T
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Nike, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
1123 granted / 1559 resolved
+2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1588
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
33.1%
-6.9% vs TC avg
§112
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1559 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 9351536 (Schindler). Regarding claims 1-9, Schindler discloses an upper component (bladder 30) for an article of footwear, the upper component comprising: an exterior upper layer including a first continuous sheet of material forming: an exterior lateral heel region, an exterior lateral midfoot region, an exterior lateral forefoot region, an exterior central forefoot region, an exterior medial forefoot region, an exterior medial midfoot region, and an exterior medial heel region (bladder is directly formed by at least two layers of material (see col. 3, lines 52-60), wherein the top/outer layer represents exterior upper layer and the bottom/inner layer represents the interior upper layer; see figures 1-5 and 7 showing the continuous layers in the heel, midfoot, forefoot, central forefoot, medial forefoot, medial midfoot and medial heel regions as claimed); and an interior upper layer including a second continuous sheet of material fixed to the first continuous sheet of material, the second continuous sheet of material forming: an interior lateral heel region, an interior lateral midfoot region, an interior lateral forefoot region, an interior central forefoot region, an interior medial forefoot region, an interior medial midfoot region, and an interior medial heel region (bladder is directly formed by at least two layers of material (see col. 3, lines 52-60), wherein the top/outer layer represents exterior upper layer and the bottom/inner layer represents the interior upper layer; see figures 1-5 and 7 showing the continuous layers in the heel, midfoot, forefoot, central forefoot, medial forefoot, medial midfoot and medial heel regions as claimed), wherein a fluid chamber is defined between the exterior upper layer and the interior upper layer (see bladder as described above), wherein the fluid chamber defines a continuous fluid path that extends through one or more upper regions as follows: (a) from a lateral heel region of the upper component, to a lateral midfoot region of the upper component, to a lateral forefoot region of the upper component, and/or (b) from a medial forefoot region of the upper component, to a medial midfoot region of the upper component, and to a medial heel region of the upper component, and/or (c) around a forefoot region of the upper component from a lateral forefoot side of the upper component to a medial forefoot side of the upper component, and/or (d) around a heel region of the upper component from a lateral heel side of the upper component to a medial heel side of the upper component (the bladder as shown in figures 1-5 and 7 extend in all of these regions as claimed and therefore “extend through one or more upper regions” as claimed.). Regarding claim 2 [2. The upper component according to claim 1, wherein an inner surface of the fluid chamber is formed directly by: (a) an interior surface of the exterior upper layer and (b) an interior surface of the interior upper layer.]; bladder is directly formed by at least two layers of material, wherein the top/outer layer represents exterior upper layer and the bottom/inner layer represents the interior upper layer; see figures 1-5 and 7 and col. 3, lines 52-60. Regarding the ring chambers in claims 3-9, Schindler teaches several ring chambers, for example see rings formed around through holes (e.g. 60a,60b in the heel region; 70,80 formed in the midfoot region; and 42,44a,44d in the forefoot region). For example the through holes (60a,60b) in the heel region which form ring chambers around these holes and have fluid passageways between and connecting the ring chambers together. Additional chambers are formed around each of these through holes and fluid passageways extending between rings. Regarding claims 10-11, Schindler discloses an upper component (bladder 30) for an article of footwear, the upper component consisting essentially of: an exterior continuous layer of material forming: an exterior lateral heel region, an exterior lateral midfoot region, an exterior lateral forefoot region, an exterior central forefoot region, an exterior medial forefoot region, an exterior medial midfoot region, and an exterior medial heel region (bladder is directly formed by at least two layers of material (see col. 3, lines 52-60), wherein the top/outer layer represents exterior continuous layer and the bottom/inner layer represents the interior upper layer; see figures 1-5 and 7 showing the continuous layers in the heel, midfoot, forefoot, central forefoot, medial forefoot, medial midfoot and medial heel regions as claimed); and an interior continuous layer of material fixed directly to the exterior continuous layer of material, the interior continuous layer of material forming: an interior lateral heel region, an interior lateral midfoot region, an interior lateral forefoot region, an interior central forefoot region, an interior medial forefoot region, an interior medial midfoot region, and an interior medial heel region (bladder is directly formed by at least two layers of material (see col. 3, lines 52-60), wherein the top/outer layer represents exterior upper layer and the bottom/inner layer represents the interior continuous layer; see figures 1-5 and 7 showing the continuous layers in the heel, midfoot, forefoot, central forefoot, medial forefoot, medial midfoot and medial heel regions as claimed), wherein a fluid chamber is defined between the exterior continuous layer of material and the interior continuous layer of material (see bladder as described above). Regarding claim 11 [11. The upper component according to claim 10, wherein the fluid chamber defines a continuous fluid path that extends continuously between two or more regions of the upper component selected from the group consisting of: a lateral heel region of the upper component, a lateral midfoot region of the upper component, a lateral forefoot region of the upper component, a forward forefoot region of the upper component, a medial forefoot region of the upper component, a medial midfoot region of the upper component, and a medial heel region of the upper component.]; the bladder as shown in figures 1-5 and 7 extend in all of these regions as claimed and therefore “extend through one or more upper regions” as claimed. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-20 are allowed. Schindler doesn’t teach all of the limitations as defined in claim 12. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art cited and not relied upon by the Examiner for the above rejections are considered to be pertinent in that the references cited are considered to be the nearest prior art to the subject matter defined in the claims as required by MPEP707.05. Applicant is duly reminded that a complete response must satisfy the requirements of 37 C.F. R. 1.111, including: -“The reply must present arguments pointing out the specific distinctions believed to render the claims, including any newly presented claims, patentable over any applied references.” --“A general allegation that the claims define a patentable invention without specifically pointing out how the language of the claims patentably distinguishes them from the references does not comply with the requirements of this section.” -Moreover, “The prompt development of a clear issue requires that the replies of the applicant meet the objections to and rejections of the claims. Applicant should also specifically point out the support for any amendments made to the disclosure. See MPEP 2163.06” MPEP 714.02. The “disclosure” includes the claims, the specification and the drawings. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TED KAVANAUGH whose telephone number is (571) 272-4556. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday 8AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule a telephone interview, applicant is encouraged to call the examiner. Normally telephone interviews can quickly be scheduled. For other types of interviews, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khoa Huynh can be reached on 57-1272-4888. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Ted Kavanaugh/ Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 3732 Tel: (571) 272-4556
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593895
Connection system for crampons
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582196
ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR INCLUDING A SOLE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575639
CO-MOLDED 3D ELEMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575624
Waterproof Lower Limb Device, Systems, and Methods
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569027
RAPID-ENTRY FOOTWEAR COMPRISED OF A UNIFIED MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.6%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1559 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month