Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/028,333

ELECTRO-OPTICAL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Examiner
TUNG, DAVID
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Magnolia White Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
355 granted / 575 resolved
At TC average
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
593
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
56.5%
+16.5% vs TC avg
§102
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 575 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/17/2025 is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 8 is objected to because of the following informalities: As to claim 8, the claim recites “wo”, which appears to be a typographical error. Examiner suggests changing “wo” to “two”. For purposes of examination, the Examiner will be interpreting “wo” as “two”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United States. Claim(s) 1-11 is/are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Wyler et al. (US 5270693). As to claim 1, Wylder discloses an electro-optical device [abstract & fig. 3] comprising: a substrate (mounting plane 27 & octagonal glass sheet 36) [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 1-17 & 54-67]; signal lines (scan lines and data lines) [figs. 4-5 & col. 6 lines 18-31] extending in a first direction and arranged in a second direction intersecting the first direction on the substrate; a pixel area (pixel area with electrodes corresponding to circle 30) [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 1-17 & 31-43] in which pixel electrodes are disposed; a signal output circuit (column driver circuits 10, 11, 12, 13 & row driver circuits 20, 21, 22, 23) [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 54-67] disposed outside the pixel area [fig. 3] and outputting driving signals to the signal lines [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 31-43], the signal output circuit including circuit blocks arranged along an outer peripheral edge of the pixel area (column driver circuits 10, 11, 12, 13 & row driver circuits 20, 21, 22, 23) [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 31-43 & 54-67]; and connection wirings (wiring that connects column driver circuits and row driver circuits to corresponding data lines and scan lines, respectively) [figs. 3-5 & col. 6 lines18-31], each connecting one of the circuit blocks to a corresponding one of the signal lines (wiring that connects column driver circuits and row driver circuits to corresponding data lines and scan lines, respectively) [figs. 3-5 & col. 6 lines18-31], wherein the outer peripheral edge of the pixel area has a curved portion or a bent portion (curved portion formed by seal between circle 30 & circle 35) [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 1-17], and a straight-line portion contacting the curved portion or the bent portion (at 12, 3, 6, 9 o’clock portion, straight-line contacting curved seal) [fig. 3], the signal output circuit includes a first circuit group (column driver circuits 10, 11, 12, 13) [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 54-67] and a second circuit group (row driver circuits 20, 21, 22, 23) [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 54-67], the first circuit group includes first ones of the circuit blocks facing the curved portion or the bent portion (column driver circuits 10 & 11 facing towards curved seal) [figs. 3-4], the second circuit group includes second ones of the circuit blocks facing the straight-line portion (row driver circuits 20 & 21 facing straight edges) [figs. 3 & 5], and a first gap between the first circuit group and the second circuit group faces the curved portion or the bent portion (gap between column driver circuit 11 & row driver circuit 20, facing curved seal) [fig. 3]. As to claim 2, Wylder discloses the electro-optical device according to claim 1, wherein the outer peripheral edge has a contact portion (straight line meets curved seal at 12 o’clock between column driver circuit 11 & row driver circuit 20) [fig. 3] where the straight-line portion contacts the curved portion or the bent portion, and the first gap faces the contact portion (between column driver circuit 11 & row driver circuit 20) [fig. 3]. As to claim 3, Wylder discloses the electro-optical device according to claim 1, wherein the first circuit group has a second gap between two of the circuit blocks included in the first circuit group (note gap between column driver circuits 10 & 11) [figs. 3-4]. As to claim 4, Wylder discloses the electro-optical device according to claim 3, wherein the first circuit group has a third gap between two of the circuit blocks included in the first circuit group (gap between column driver 10 & 12) [fig. 3], the second gap is disposed between the first gap and the third gap (gap between column driver 10 & 11 between gap between column driver 11 & row driver 20 as well as column drivers 10 & 12) [fig. 3], and the second gap is smaller than the third gap [fig. 3]. As to claim 5, Wylder discloses the electro-optical device according to claim 3, wherein the second gap is smaller than the first gap [figs. 3-4]. As to claim 6, Wylder discloses an electro-optical device [abstract & fig. 3] comprising: a substrate (mounting plane 27 & octagonal glass sheet 36) [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 1-17 & 54-67]; signal lines (scan lines and data lines) [figs. 4-5 & col. 6 lines 18-31] extending in a first direction and arranged in a second direction intersecting the first direction on the substrate; a pixel area (pixel area with electrodes corresponding to circle 30) [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 1-17 & 31-43] in which pixel electrodes are disposed; a signal output circuit (column driver circuits 10, 11, 12, 13 & row driver circuits 20, 21, 22, 23) [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 54-67] disposed outside the pixel area [fig. 3] and outputting driving signals to the signal lines [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 31-43], the signal output circuit including circuit blocks arranged along an outer peripheral edge of the pixel area (column driver circuits 10, 11, 12, 13 & row driver circuits 20, 21, 22, 23) [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 31-43 & 54-67]; and connection wirings (wiring that connects column driver circuits and row driver circuits to corresponding data lines and scan lines, respectively) [figs. 3-5 & col. 6 lines18-31], each connecting one of the circuit blocks to a corresponding one of the signal lines (wiring that connects column driver circuits and row driver circuits to corresponding data lines and scan lines, respectively) [figs. 3-5 & col. 6 lines18-31], wherein the outer peripheral edge of the pixel area has a curved portion or a bent portion facing the signal output circuit (curved portion formed by seal between circle 30 & circle 35) [figs. 3-5 & col. 5 lines 1-17], an edge of the substrate has two straight-line parts connecting with each other at corner part of the edge (top straight-line portion joining to diagonal corner portion) [figs. 3-5], at least one of the two straight-line parts faces to the curved portion or the bent portion (at 12, 3, 6, 9 o’clock portion, straight-line contacting curved seal) [fig. 3], some of the circuit blocks are disposed between the at least one of the two straight- line parts and the curved portion or between the at least one of the two straight-line parts and the bent portion [figs. 3-5], and the some of the circuit blocks are arranged in a linear manner along the at least one of the two straight-line parts (column driver circuits 10 & 11 arranged along diagonal corner portion of straight-line) [figs. 3-5]. As to claim 7, Wylder discloses the electro-optical device according to claim 6, wherein some of the circuit blocks are arranged in a linear manner along a first one of the two straight-line parts (column driver circuits 10 & 11 arranged along diagonal corner portion of straight-line) [figs. 3-5], and others of the circuit blocks are arranged in a linear manner along a second one of the two straight-line parts (column driver circuit 11 & row driver circuit 20 arranged along top straight-line portion) [fig. 3]. As to claim 8, Wylder discloses the electro-optical device according to claim 6 wherein a first one of the two straight-line parts extend in a direction different from the first and second directions (straight-line corresponding to diagonal corner portion) [figs. 3-5], and a second one of the wo straight-line parts extend in the second direction (top straight-line portion) [fig. 3]. As to claim 9, Wylder discloses the electro-optical device according to claim 6, wherein some of the circuit blocks are arranged in a direction different from the first and second directions (column driver circuits 10 & 11) [figs. 3-4], and others of the circuit blocks are arranged in the second direction (column driver circuit 11 & row driver circuit 20) [fig. 3]. As to claim 10, Wylder discloses the electro-optical device according to claim 6, wherein the corner part faces to the curved portion or the bent portion in the first direction [figs. 3-5]. As to claim 11, Wylder discloses the electro-optical device according to claim 6, wherein a first one of the two straight-line parts extend in a direction different from the first and second directions (straight-line corresponding to diagonal corner portion) [figs. 3-5], a second one of the two straight-line parts extend in the second direction (top straight-line portion) [fig. 3], the second one of the two straight-line parts faces some of the circuit blocks arranged in a direction different from the first and second directions (column driver circuit 11) [fig. 3], and others of the circuit blocks arranged in the second direction (column driver circuit 11 & row driver circuit 20) [fig. 3]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID TUNG whose telephone number is (571)270-3385. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday; 10:00AM - 6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at (571)-272-7603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID TUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603413
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603062
IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597399
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592181
PIXEL CIRCUIT AND MICRO LED DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592201
GATE DRIVER AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+16.4%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 575 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month