Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 19/028,396

ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR WIRED AND WIRELESS CHARGING IN ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103§DP
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Examiner
CHOWDHURI, SWARNA N
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
258 granted / 340 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
371
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
59.6%
+19.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 340 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Current Application: 19/028396 US Patent: 11626748 A mobile computing device for providing cellular communication, comprising: a display; a battery; a conductive pattern for wirelessly transmitting or receiving power; a connector for transmitting or receiving power via a wire; a communication module for communicating with another computing device; a power management module electrically connected with the battery for managing power supplied to components of the mobile computing device including the connector and the conductive pattern; a processor; and a memory storing instructions, which when executed by the processor, cause the mobile computing device to: supply, via control of the power management module, power from the battery to the conductive pattern to wirelessly transmit first power to a first external device, supply, via control of the power management module, power from the battery to the connector to transmit second power via the wire to a second external device for performing an on-the-go (OTG) function of the second external device, and while the second external device is connected to the connector for the OTG connection, receive data from the second external device through the connector while transmitting the first and second power from the battery. 1.A mobile computing device for providing cellular communication, comprising: a display; a battery; a conductive pattern for wirelessly transmitting or receiving power; a connector for transmitting or receiving power via a wire; a communication module for communicating with another computing device; a power management module electrically connected with the battery for managing power supplied to components of the mobile computing device including the connector and the conductive pattern; a processor; and a memory storing instructions, which when executed by the processor, cause the mobile computing device to: supply, via control of the power management module, power from the battery to the conductive pattern to wirelessly transmit first power to a first external device, supply, via control of the power management module, power from the battery to the connector to transmit second power via the wire to a second external device for performing an on-the-go (OTG) function of the second external device, display, on the display, first information and second information concurrently, based on the first power and the second power being concurrently transmitted, and while the second external device is connected to the connector for the an OTG connection, receive data from the second external device through the connector while transmitting the first and second power from the battery, wherein the first information indicates that the first power is being wirelessly transmitted to the first external device and the second information indicates that the second external device is connected to the mobile computing device to perform the OTG function, and wherein the power management module is further configured to: change a first voltage of a power output by the battery into a second voltage to generate the first power and the second power, the second voltage being higher than the first voltage, and supply the first power having the second voltage to the conductive pattern, and the second power having the second voltage to the connector. Claim 1 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 11626748. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the scope of the examined claim 1 fully encompasses the scope of the patented claim 1 of US 11626748. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2015/0194839 (Wojcik). Regarding claim 1, Wojcik teaches a mobile computing device (Fig. 1-5 shows battery pack) for providing cellular communication (Fig. 1 shows battery pack 100 with cellular communication) [0037], comprising: a display (Fig. 1 shows display elements 192) [0025, 0038]; a battery (Fig. 1-5 shows battery 150) [0025-26, 0074]; a conductive pattern (Fig. 5 shows coil 512) for wirelessly transmitting or receiving power (coil 512 wirelessly transmits power) [0066-69]; a connector (Fig. 3 shows device interface 382, 384 which are electromechanical connectors) [0035, 0044] for transmitting or receiving power via a wire (Fig. 2 shows cable 219) [0044]; a communication module (Fig. 1 shows wireless communication module 160) for communicating with another computing device (wireless communication module 160 enables wireless communication between battery pack 100 and one or more electronic devices) [0037]; a power management module (Fig. 1 shows switching circuitry 110 and control circuitry 170) electrically connected with the battery (Fig. 1 shows battery 150 electrically connected to switching circuitry 110) for managing power supplied to components of the mobile computing device (Fig. 1 shows battery pack 100) including the connector (electromechanical connectors connected to cable 219 as shown in Fig. 2) and the conductive pattern (coil 512) [0036, 0056]; a processor (Fig. 1 shows control circuitry 170); and a memory storing instructions [0034, 0071], which when executed by the processor (Fig. 1 shows control circuitry 170), cause the mobile computing device (Fig. 1 shows battery pack 100) [0034] to: supply, via control of the power management module (Fig. 1 shows switching circuity 110 and control circuitry 170), power from the battery (Fig. 1 shows battery 150) to the conductive pattern (Fig. 5 shows coil 512) to wirelessly transmit first power to a first external device (Fig. 5 shows coil 512 to transmit first power to a first external device) [0066-67], supply, via control of the power management module (Fig. 1 shows switching circuitry 110 and control circuitry 170), power from the battery (Fig. 1 shows battery 150) to the connector (electromechanical connectors connected to cable 219 as shown in Fig. 2) to transmit second power via the wire (Fig. 2 shows cable 219) to a second external device for performing an on-the-go (OTG) function of the second external device (Fig. 2 shows cable 219 connected to external device 210). However, Wojcik Fig. 1-5 does not teach while the second external device is connected to the connector for the OTG connection, receive data from the second external device through the connector while transmitting the first and second power from the battery. However, Wojcik Fig. 14 teaches while the second external device is connected to the connector for the OTG connection (Fig. 14 shows computing device 1488 connected via OTG connection to charger 1440), receive data from the second external device through the connector while transmitting the first and second power from the battery (Fig. 14 shows charger 1440 to provide first power to the battery pack 1400 via wireless means and simultaneously provide second power to computing device 1488 via cable as shown in addition to data communications between battery pack 1400 and charger 1440) [0106-107]. It would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have while the second external device is connected to the connector for the OTG connection, receive data from the second external device through the connector while transmitting the first and second power from the battery as taught by Wojcik Fig. 14 embodiment in order to ensure simultaneous charging of various devices while also exchanging data thereby ensuring efficient power and data exchange. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SWARNA N CHOWDHURI whose telephone number is (571)431-0696. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at 571-272-7496. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SWARNA N. CHOWDHURI Examiner Art Unit 2836 /S.N.C/Examiner, Art Unit 2836 /DANIEL CAVALLARI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §DP
Mar 04, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 17, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 21, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 01, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603519
EMERGENCY LIGHTING SYSTEM WITH BATTERY IDENTIFICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594839
ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE LOW-VOLTAGE (LV) BUS VOLTAGE CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589674
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587028
Battery Pack, Battery Pack System and Power Tool
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570150
POWER DISTRIBUTION DEVICE AND TRANSPORTATION DEVICE HAVING POWER DISTRIBUTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+21.9%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 340 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month