Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/028,491

ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR REDUCING OCCURRENCE OF UNINTENDED USER INPUT AND OPERATION METHOD FOR THE SAME

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Feb 19, 2019 — RE 10-2019-0019492 +3 more
Examiner
LEA EDMONDS, LISA S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
668 granted / 769 resolved
+26.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
773
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§102
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 769 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
CTNF 19/028,491 CTNF 75503 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Priority 02-26 AIA Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 01/17/2025 and 02/20/2026 were considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 07-06 AIA 15-10-15 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 07-07-aia AIA 07-07 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – 07-08-aia AIA (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 07-15-aia AIA Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (9830075). With respect to claim 1, Kim et al. (9830075) discloses an electronic device (200) comprising: a first housing (201a); a second housing (201b); a display (251), comprising a touch controller (180); a memory (inherent) storing instructions; and at least one processor (inherent) configured to: receive, from the touch controller (180), a touch event produced based on an input on the display (251) while an angle between the first housing (201a) and the second housing (201b) is being changed; execute an operation corresponding to the received touch event; and based on an amount of change in the angle being more than a predetermined value while the touch event is maintained on the display (251), cancel the execution of the operation corresponding to the received touch event . Double Patenting 08-30 AIA A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co. , 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel , 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert , 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. 08-31 AIA Claim 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,204,369 . This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion 07-96 AIA The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LISA LEA-EDMONDS whose telephone number is (571)272-2043. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached at 571-272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LISA LEA-EDMONDS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2847 /LISA LEA-EDMONDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847 2026-06-12 Application/Control Number: 19/028,491 Page 2 Art Unit: 2847 Application/Control Number: 19/028,491 Page 3 Art Unit: 2847 Application/Control Number: 19/028,491 Page 4 Art Unit: 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12675138
ELECTRONIC DEVICES THAT DETECT ACCESSORY DEVICES AT MULTIPLE LOCATIONS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670817
Display Device
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12670818
SUPPORTING BACKPLANE AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663834
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656823
FLEXIBLE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+4.9%)
1y 10m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 769 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month