Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/028,680

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Feb 28, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0029131
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, ROCKSHANA D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
533 granted / 660 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
692
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
83.4%
+43.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 660 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 9, 11 and 13-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seo et al (US Patent No. 12581005 B2 and Seo hereinafter) in view of Kim et al (US Patent No. 12493325 B2 and Kim hereinafter) Regarding claim 1, Seo discloses (Figs. 1-7B) a display apparatus comprising: a display panel (DP) including a non-bending area (NFA1-NFA2) and a bending area (FA) adjacent to the non- bending area; and a support member (UM) located below the display panel and including a plurality of fiber bundles (ML) and a resin (BS) surrounding the plurality of fiber bundles (fig.5). Seo does not explicitly disclose wherein the plurality of fiber bundles are woven to have a first pattern in the non-bending area and are woven to have a second pattern in at least a partial area of the bending area, and wherein at least one of a weave form or a fiber density of the first pattern is different from at least one of a weave form or a fiber density of the second pattern. However, Kim teaches (figs. 1-13) wherein the plurality of fiber bundles (FB and FP) are woven to have a first pattern in the non-bending area (NFA1) and are woven to have a second pattern (C) in at least a partial area of the bending area (FA), and wherein at least one of a weave form or a fiber density of the first pattern is different from at least one of a weave form or a fiber density of the second pattern (figs.7-8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the plurality of fiber bundles having first/second patterns of Kim to device of Seo in order to improve folding properties of the display device (Kim and Col 12, lines 45-50) Regarding claim 2, Seo/Kim discloses the display apparatus of claim 1. Kim further teaches (figs. 1-13) wherein the first pattern is a plain weave form or a twill weave form (fig.7), and the second pattern is a satin weave form (fig.8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Plain/Satin weave of Kim to device of Seo in order to improve folding properties of the display device (Kim and Col 12, lines 45-50) Regarding claim 3, Seo/Kim discloses the display apparatus of claim 1. Kim further teaches (figs. 1-13) wherein the first pattern and the second pattern are a plain weave form or a twill weave form, and wherein a density of the plurality of fiber bundles included in the second pattern is lower than a density of the plurality of fiber bundles included in the first pattern (figs. 7-8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Plain/Satin weave of Lee to device of Seo in order to improve folding properties of the display device (Kim and Col 12, lines 45-50) Regarding claim 9, Seo/Kim discloses the display apparatus of claim 1. Seo discloses (figs. 1-7B) a back plate (PF) disposed between the display panel and the support member, wherein the support member contacts a lower surface of the back plate. Regarding claim 11, Seo/Kim discloses the display apparatus of claim 1. Seo discloses (figs. 1-7B) wherein a width in a horizontal direction of the support member is equal to a width in the horizontal direction of the display panel. Regarding claim 13, Seo/Kim discloses the display apparatus of claim 1. Seo discloses (figs. 1-7B) wherein the plurality of fiber bundles include first fibers (ML1)and second fibers (ML2) , and wherein the first fibers arranged in the bending area are connected to the first fibers arranged in the non-bending area, and the second fibers arranged in the bending area are connected to the second fibers arranged in the non-bending area (shows in figs 6A-C). Regarding claim 14, Seo discloses (Figs. 1-7B) a display apparatus comprising: a display panel (DP) including a first area (NFA1-NFA2) and a second area (FA) adjacent to the first area; and a support member (UM) disposed on a back surface of the display panel and including a plurality of fiber bundles (ML). Seo does not explicitly disclose wherein the plurality of fiber bundles are woven in a first pattern in an area overlapping the first area and are woven in a second pattern in an area overlapping at least a part of the second area, wherein the first pattern and the second pattern are different weave type or the plurality of fiber bundles included in the first pattern and the plurality of fiber bundles included in the second pattern have different density. However, Kim teaches (figs. 1-13) wherein the plurality of fiber bundles (FB and FP) are woven in a first pattern (B) in an area overlapping the first area (NFA1) and are woven in a second pattern (C) in an area overlapping at least a part of the second area (FA), wherein the first pattern and the second pattern are different weave type or the plurality of fiber bundles included in the first pattern and the plurality of fiber bundles included in the second pattern have different density (shows in figs 7-8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the plurality of fiber bundles having first/second patterns of Kim to device of Seo in order to improve folding properties of the display device (Kim and Col 12, lines 45-50) Regarding claim 15, Seo/Kim discloses the display apparatus of claim 14. Seo further teaches (Figs. 1-7B) wherein the first area is flat, and at least a part of the second area is bent. Regarding claim 16, Seo/Kim discloses the display apparatus of claim 14. Kim further teaches (figs. 1-13) wherein the first pattern is a plain weave form or a twill weave form (fig.7), and the second pattern is a satin weave form (fig.8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Plain/Satin weave of Kim to device of Seo in order to improve folding properties of the display device (Kim and Col 12, lines 45-50) Regarding claim 17, Seo/Kim discloses the display apparatus of claim 14. Kim further teaches (figs. 1-13) wherein the first pattern and the second pattern are a plain weave form or a twill weave form, and wherein a density of the plurality of fiber bundles included in the second pattern is lower than a density of the plurality of fiber bundles included in the first pattern (shows in figs 7-8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Plain/Satin weave of Kim to device of Seo in order to improve folding properties of the display device (Kim and Col 12, lines 45-50) Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seo et al in view of Kim et al and further in view of Yoo et al ( US Pub No. 2021/0349242 A1 and Yoo hereinafter) Regarding claim 10, Seo/Kim discloses the display apparatus of claim 1, but fails to disclose wherein the support member further includes a tackifier. However, Yoo teaches (figs. 1-3) wherein the support member (2) further includes a tackifier ([0078]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the support member having a tackifier of Yoo to device of Seo/Kim in order to provides a protective film for a foldable display (Yoo and [0078]) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-8, 12 and 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 4, the prior art fails to disclose, “ wherein the support member is woven to have a third pattern, in at least another partial area of the bending area, at least one of the weave form or the fiber density of the third pattern being different from at least one of the weave form or the fiber density of the second pattern.” Claims 5-8 and 12 are objected being depend on claim 4. Regarding claim 18, the prior art fails to disclose, “wherein the support member is woven to have a third pattern different from the second pattern in an area overlapping at least another part of the second area”. Claims 19-20 are objected being depend on claim 18. However, the prior art (Included in PTO 892 and IDS) , when taken alone, or, in combination, cannot be construed as reasonably teaching or suggesting all of the elements of the claimed invention as arranged, disposed, or provided in the manner as claimed by the Applicant. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROCKSHANA D CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)272-1602. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8 AM - 4:30 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen L Parker can be reached at 303-297-4722. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROCKSHANA D CHOWDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684720
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677403
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING VAPOR CHAMBERS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12663888
DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING FOLDING AREA
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663836
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656831
FLEXIBLE DISPLAY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.3%)
2y 2m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 660 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month