Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/028,691

RECORDING-MATERIAL-TRANSPORTING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Mar 28, 2022 — JP 2022-052656 +1 more
Examiner
SANDERS, HOWARD J
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
705 granted / 870 resolved
+29.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
908
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§102
38.8%
-1.2% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 870 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Amendment received 4/29/26 was entered into the record. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Aoyama et al. US 2003/0081269 (“Aoyama”). Regarding claim 1, Aoyama disclosed a recording-material-transporting apparatus comprising: a transport unit (Figure 1) that transports a recording material along a transport path; a common housing (of the image reading apparatus) that supports (a) an upper image reader (20) which reads an image formed on an upper side of the recording material at an upper image reading position and (b) a lower image reader (including 10) which reads an image formed on a lower side of the recording material at the lower image reading position (Figure 1); and a guide member (including 200) that guides the recording material being transported along the transport path, wherein the upper image reading position at which the image on the upper side of the recording material is formed is located downstream in the transporting direction relative to the lower image reading position at which the image on the lower side of the recording material is formed (Figure 1), wherein the guide member is provided in a region upstream in the transporting direction from the upper image reading position and vertically above the transport path (Figure 1), wherein the guide member has one end fixed to the housing (at 21) and a handle at an other end (see the end in Figure 2 to be handled by a user), and wherein the transport path is accessible by a user through a gap (above platen glass 2) formed by moving the handle of the guide member upward (see Figures 1 and 2), and wherein the transport path is accessible by movement of the guide member while the upper image reader and the lower image reader are supported by the common housing. Regarding claim 2, Aoyama disclosed the common housing supports the transport unit (Figure 1). Regarding claim 3, Aoyama disclosed the at least one gap comprises two gaps and in one of the two gaps (above platen glass 2), the transport path is accessible at a location other than a location at which a rotating member (22) is installed in the other of the two gaps (below 20). Regarding claim 4, Aoyama disclosed the transport path extends in a horizontal direction, and wherein the one of the two gaps is positioned above the transport path (see Figures 1 and 2). Regarding claim 5, Aoyama disclosed a rotating member is provided at each of the upstream position and the downstream position (see 18 and 22), and wherein the rotating member is also supported by the common housing (Figure 5). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 4/29/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argued that Aoyama fails to teach the claimed gap upon which the transport path is accessible by a user. The Examiner notes that the claims must be given their broadest reasonable interpretation in view of the disclosure as a whole. Figure 2 of Aoyama clearly shows the transport path rendered accessible by moving the handle of the guide member upward. A user could readily access the transport path, specifically the portion above platen 2, through the gap created by moving the handle of the guide member upward. This was explained in the Interview conducted 4/16/26. It is not clear why Applicant would categorize this interpretation as unreasonable. The amended language reciting that the transport path is accessible by movement of the guide member while the upper image reader and the lower image reader are supported by the common housing does not distinguish the claimed invention from the applied art. As just explained, the transport path is accessible by movement of the guide member. Further, the upper image reader and the lower image reader are supported by the common housing of the image reading apparatus as clearly illustrated by Figures 1 and 2 of Aoyama. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOWARD J SANDERS whose telephone number is (571)270-3096. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael McCullough can be reached at (571) 272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOWARD J SANDERS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 29, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703597
PRINTING MEDIUM ACCOMMODATING APPARATUS AND PRINTING APPARATUS
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703589
MEDIUM SUPPORT TRAY, MEDIUM CONVEYANCE DEVICE, AND RECORDING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12692108
Assembly for Restraining Media in an Automatic Document Feeder
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692112
SHEET CONVEYING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12679680
MEDIUM TRANSPORT DEVICE AND RECORDING DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+7.7%)
2y 4m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 870 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month