Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/029,380

SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR INCREASING REGULARITY AND/OR PHASE-LOCKING OF NEURONAL ACTIVITY RELATING TO AN EPILEPTIC EVENT

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Mar 23, 2009 — provisional 61/210,850 +7 more
Examiner
WELCH, WILLOW GRACE
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Flint Hills Scientific L L C
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
40 granted / 72 resolved
-14.4% vs TC avg
Strong +47% interview lift
Without
With
+46.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
116
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§103
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 72 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-12 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-6 of U.S. Patent No. 10,933,241. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of the instant application are anticipated by the claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,933,241. Instant Application No. 19/029380 US Patent No. 10,933,241 Claim 1 A medical device, comprising: Claim 1 A medical device, comprising: an epileptic event detection module configured to detect an epileptic event; an epileptic event detection module configured to detect an epileptic event; at least one sensor configured to collect one or more electrical activity signals from at least one region of a brain of a patient; at least one sensor configured to collect one or more electrical activity signals relating to the epileptic event from at least one region of a brain of a patient; a regularization determination module configured to determine a regularity of the one or more electrical activity signals; a regularization determination module configured to determine a first regularity index of the one or more electrical activity signals; a neuronal regularization module configured to modify a regularity index of an electrical activity in the at least one region of the brain of the patient; a neuronal regularization module configured to modify the first regularity index of an electrical activity in the at least one region of the brain of the patient; a phase-locking determination module configured to determine a degree of phase- locking between a first electrical activity of a first brain region of the patient and a second electrical activity of a second brain region of the patient; a phase-locking determination module configured to determine a degree of phase-locking between a first electrical activity of a first brain region of the patient and a second electrical activity of a second brain region of the patient; a phase-locking module configured to modify a phase-locking index between the first electrical activity in the first brain region of the patient and the second electrical activity in the second brain region of the patient; and a phase-locking module configured to modify a first phase-locking index between the first electrical activity in the first brain region of the patient and the second electrical activity in the second brain region of the patient; a stimulation module configured to apply an electrical stimulation to at least one neural target of the patient based on an indication of the epileptic event. a stimulation module configured to apply a first electrical stimulation to a first neural target of the patient based on an indication of the epileptic event; Claim 7 A medical device, comprising: Claim 1 A medical device, comprising: an epileptic event detection module configured to detect an epileptic event; an epileptic event detection module configured to detect an epileptic event; at least one sensor configured to collect one or more electrical activity signals from a first region of a brain of a patient and a second region of the brain of the patient; at least one sensor configured to collect one or more electrical activity signals relating to the epileptic event from at least one region of a brain of a patient; a regularization determination module configured to determine a first regularity index of the one or more electrical activity signals; a regularization determination module configured to determine a first regularity index of the one or more electrical activity signals; a neuronal regularization module configured to modify the first regularity index of an electrical activity in the first region of the brain of the patient; a neuronal regularization module configured to modify the first regularity index of an electrical activity in the at least one region of the brain of the patient; a phase-locking determination module configured to determine a degree of phase- locking between a first electrical activity of a first brain region of the patient and a second electrical activity of a second brain region of the patient; a phase-locking determination module configured to determine a degree of phase-locking between a first electrical activity of a first brain region of the patient and a second electrical activity of a second brain region of the patient; a phase-locking module configured to modify a first phase-locking index between the first electrical activity in the first brain region of the patient and the second electrical activity in the second brain region of the patient; a phase-locking module configured to modify a first phase-locking index between the first electrical activity in the first brain region of the patient and the second electrical activity in the second brain region of the patient; a stimulation module configured to apply a first electrical stimulation to a first neural target of the patient based on an indication of the epileptic event; a stimulation module configured to apply a first electrical stimulation to a first neural target of the patient based on an indication of the epileptic event; wherein the epileptic event detection module is configured to: detect a second electrical activity signal relating to an epileptic activity in the second brain region of the patient; wherein the epileptic event detection module is configured to: detect a second electrical activity signal relating to an epileptic activity in the second brain region of the patient; determining a second regularity index based on the second electrical activity signal; determining a second regularity index based on the second electrical activity signal; determine a second phase-locking index between the first brain region and the second brain region of the patient if the first regularity index and the second regularity index are both within a first range; and determine a second phase-locking index between the first brain region and the second brain region of the patient based on the first regularity index and the second regularity index being within a first range; and applying a second electrical stimulation to a second neural target of the patient for treating the epileptic activity, in response to the second phase-locking index being within a second range. applying a second electrical stimulation to a second neural target of the patient for treating the epileptic activity, in response to the second phase-locking index being within a second range. Dependent claims 2-6 and 8-12 of the instant application are also anticipated by claims 2-6 of US Patent No. 10,933,241. Instant Application No. 19/029380 US Patent No. 10,933,241 Claims 2 and 8 Claim 2 Claims 3 and 9 Claim 3 Claims 4 and 10 Claim 4 Claims 5 and 11 Claim 5 Claims 6 and 12 Claim 6 A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-12 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,274,880. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Instant Application No. 19/029380 US Patent No. 12,274,880 Claim 1 A medical device, comprising: Claim 1 A medical device, comprising: an epileptic event detection module configured to detect an epileptic event; an epileptic event detection module configured to detect an epileptic event; at least one sensor configured to collect one or more electrical activity signals from at least one region of a brain of a patient; at least one sensor configured to collect one or more electrical activity signals from at least one region of a brain of a patient; a regularization determination module configured to determine a regularity of the one or more electrical activity signals; a regularization determination module configured to determine a regularity of the one or more electrical activity signals; a neuronal regularization module configured to modify a regularity index of an electrical activity in the at least one region of the brain of the patient; a neuronal regularization module configured to modify a regularity index of an electrical activity in the at least one region of the brain of the patient; a phase-locking determination module configured to determine a degree of phase- locking between a first electrical activity of a first brain region of the patient and a second electrical activity of a second brain region of the patient; a phase-locking determination module configured to determine a degree of phase-locking between a first electrical activity of a first brain region of the patient and a second electrical activity of a second brain region of the patient; a phase-locking module configured to modify a phase-locking index between the first electrical activity in the first brain region of the patient and the second electrical activity in the second brain region of the patient; and a phase-locking module configured to modify a phase-locking index between the first electrical activity in the first brain region of the patient and the second electrical activity in the second brain region of the patient; and a stimulation module configured to apply an electrical stimulation to at least one neural target of the patient based on an indication of the epileptic event. a stimulation module configured to apply an electrical stimulation to at least one neural target of the patient based on an indication of the epileptic event. Claim 7 A medical device, comprising: Claim 7 A medical device, comprising: an epileptic event detection module configured to detect an epileptic event; an epileptic event detection module configured to detect an epileptic event; at least one sensor configured to collect one or more electrical activity signals from a first region of a brain of a patient and a second region of the brain of the patient; at least one sensor configured to collect one or more electrical activity signals from a first region of a brain of a patient and a second region of the brain of the patient; a regularization determination module configured to determine a first regularity index of the one or more electrical activity signals; a regularization determination module configured to determine a first regularity index of the one or more electrical activity signals; a neuronal regularization module configured to modify the first regularity index of an electrical activity in the first region of the brain of the patient; a neuronal regularization module configured to modify the first regularity index of an electrical activity in the first region of the brain of the patient; a phase-locking determination module configured to determine a degree of phase- locking between a first electrical activity of a first brain region of the patient and a second electrical activity of a second brain region of the patient; a phase-locking determination module configured to determine a degree of phase-locking between a first electrical activity of a first brain region of the patient and a second electrical activity of a second brain region of the patient; a phase-locking module configured to modify a first phase-locking index between the first electrical activity in the first brain region of the patient and the second electrical activity in the second brain region of the patient; a phase-locking module configured to modify a first phase-locking index between the first electrical activity in the first brain region of the patient and the second electrical activity in the second brain region of the patient; a stimulation module configured to apply a first electrical stimulation to a first neural target of the patient based on an indication of the epileptic event; a stimulation module configured to apply a first electrical stimulation to a first neural target of the patient based on an indication of the epileptic event; wherein the epileptic event detection module is configured to: detect a second electrical activity signal relating to an epileptic activity in the second brain region of the patient; wherein the epileptic event detection module is configured to: detect a second electrical activity signal relating to an epileptic activity in the second brain region of the patient; determining a second regularity index based on the second electrical activity signal; determining a second regularity index based on the second electrical activity signal; determine a second phase-locking index between the first brain region and the second brain region of the patient if the first regularity index and the second regularity index are both within a first range; and determine a second phase-locking index between the first brain region and the second brain region of the patient if the first regularity index and the second regularity index are both within a first range; and applying a second electrical stimulation to a second neural target of the patient for treating the epileptic activity, in response to the second phase-locking index being within a second range. applying a second electrical stimulation to a second neural target of the patient for treating the epileptic activity, in response to the second phase-locking index being within a second range. Dependent claims 2-6 and 8-12 of the instant application are also anticipated by claims 2-6 and 8-12 of US Patent No. 12,274,880. Instant Application No. 19/029380 US Patent No. 12,274,880 Claim 2 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 6 Claim 8 Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 12 Allowable Subject Matter Examiner notes that claims 1-12 are rejected under Double Patenting, however, no prior art rejections have been made. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Examiner has not found any prior art that teaches or suggests in combination the limitations recited in claims 1 and 7. Specifically, Examiner has not found prior art that teaches: “a neuronal regularization module configured to modify a regularity index of an electrical activity in the at least one region of the brain of the patient; and a phase-locking module configured to modify a phase-locking index between the first electrical activity in the first brain region of the patient and the second electrical activity in the second brain region of the patient”. Sackellares et al (US 2004/0122335) discloses deriving a T-index, where the T-index values associated with a given channel pair reflect a level of correlation between the spatio-temporal responses of the two channels that make up the channel pair [0057], but fails to disclose a phase-locking module configured to modify a phase-locking index between the first electrical activity in the first brain region of the patient and the second electrical activity in the second brain region of the patient. Sackellares instead teaches taking new measurements of the T-index based on gathered data [0058] instead of modifying the determined index. Jassemidis et al (US 2009/0264952) discloses deriving a T-index to measure a synchronization or entrainment between signals [0040] and delivering stimulation until the T-index is above a threshold [0086]. However, Jassemidis is silent regarding a neuronal regularization module configured to modify a regularity index of an electrical activity in the at least one region of the brain of the patient. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sackellares et al (US 2004/0122335) which teaches measuring a correlation between spatio-temporal responses across multiple channels and Jassemidis et al (US 2009/0264952) which teaches measuring synchronization or entrainment between signals using a T-index and delivering stimulation to modify the T-index in order to prevent a seizure from occurring. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLOW GRACE WELCH whose telephone number is (703)756-1596. The examiner can normally be reached Usually M-F 8:00am - 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Klein can be reached at 571-270-5213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLOW GRACE WELCH/Examiner, Art Unit 3792 /William J Levicky/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12758133
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ENGINEERING VISUAL FEATURES FROM BIOPHYSICAL SIGNALS FOR USE IN CHARACTERIZING PHYSIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
4y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12733878
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR COLLECTING AND PROCESSING DATA ON ONE OR MORE PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF MONITORED SUBJECT
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733862
HYPOXIC OR ANOXIC NEUROLOGICAL INJURY DETECTION WITH EAR-WEARABLE DEVICES AND SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721540
MACHINE LEARNING-BASED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BREATH MONITORING AND ASSISTANCE OF A PATIENT
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722012
CLOSED-LOOP DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION (DBS) PROGRAMMING BASED ON EVOKED SIGNALS AND LOCAL FIELD POTENTIAL (LFP) SIGNALS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+46.6%)
3y 3m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 72 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month