Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/029,434

ELECTRICALLY EXCITED SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR, DRIVE SYSTEM AND VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Jan 19, 2024 — CN 202420143388.X
Examiner
VO, ETHAN NGUYEN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Valeo S.A.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
49 granted / 62 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
79
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
67.1%
+27.1% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 62 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-6, 10-13, 15-17, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Herbold (DE 10 2007036318). As to claim 1, Herbold discloses an electrically excited synchronous motor (Para 0002), comprising: a stator comprising a stator core and a stator winding (Fig. 1; Para 0024), wherein the stator core is provided with a plurality of stator slots uniformly distributed around a rotational axis of the electrically excited synchronous motor (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2), and the stator winding is accommodated in the stator slots (Fig. 1); and a rotor comprising a rotor core and a rotor excitation winding (Fig. 1); wherein the stator slot is inclined relative to the rotational axis at a predetermined inclination angle (Fig. 2). PNG media_image1.png 668 500 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 420 520 media_image2.png Greyscale As to claim 2, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 1, wherein the stator core comprises a plurality of stator laminations stacked together in sequence (Para 0024), and the stator laminations are provided with slot holes for forming the stator slots (Fig. 2). PNG media_image2.png 420 520 media_image2.png Greyscale As to claim 3, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 2, wherein any one stator lamination among the plurality of stator laminations is rotated by a first rotation angle in a circumferential direction relative to a previous stator lamination (Fig. 2). PNG media_image3.png 458 520 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 554 520 media_image4.png Greyscale As to claim 5, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 1, wherein the stator core defines, in a radial inner portion thereof, an accommodation space for accommodating the rotor (Fig. 1), and the stator slots comprise opening portions leading to the accommodation space (Fig. 2), and the opening portions are inclined at a first inclination angle relative to the rotational axis (Fig. 2). PNG media_image5.png 704 523 media_image5.png Greyscale As to claim 6, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 1, wherein the stator winding comprises a plurality of winding conductors (Fig. 1; Para 0002 “windings”), and the winding conductors comprise main body portions inserted into the stator slots (Fig. 1) and inclined relative to the rotational axis (Fig. 2). PNG media_image6.png 723 523 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 554 520 media_image4.png Greyscale As to claim 10, Herbold discloses a drive system (Para 0018), comprising the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 1. As to claim 11, Herbold discloses a vehicle (Para 0002), comprising the drive system according to claim 10. As to claim 12, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 2, wherein the stator core defines, in a radial inner portion thereof, an accommodation space for accommodating the rotor (Fig. 1), and the stator slots comprise opening portions leading to the accommodation space (Fig. 2), and the opening portions are inclined at a first inclination angle relative to the rotational axis (Fig. 2). PNG media_image6.png 723 523 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 554 520 media_image4.png Greyscale As to claim 13, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 2, wherein the stator winding comprises a plurality of winding conductors (Fig. 1; Para 0002 “windings”), and the winding conductors comprise main body portions inserted into the stator slots (Fig. 1) and inclined relative to the rotational axis (Fig. 2). PNG media_image6.png 723 523 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 554 520 media_image4.png Greyscale As to claim 15, Herbold discloses a drive system (Para 0018), comprising the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 2. As to claim 16, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 3, wherein the stator core defines, in a radial inner portion thereof, an accommodation space for accommodating the rotor (Fig. 1), and the stator slots comprise opening portions leading to the accommodation space (Fig. 2), and the opening portions are inclined at a first inclination angle relative to the rotational axis (Fig. 2). PNG media_image5.png 704 523 media_image5.png Greyscale As to claim 17, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 3, wherein the stator winding comprises a plurality of winding conductors (Fig. 1; Para 0002 “windings”), and the winding conductors comprise main body portions inserted into the stator slots (Fig. 1) and inclined relative to the rotational axis (Fig. 2). PNG media_image6.png 723 523 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 554 520 media_image4.png Greyscale As to claim 19, Herbold discloses a drive system (Para 0018), comprising the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 3. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 4 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Herbold. As to claim 4, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 3, wherein the stator core is provided with n stator slots, wherein n is a positive integer greater than or equal to 1, and a rotation angle. Herbold fails to disclose the rotation angle of the last stator lamination among the plurality of stator laminations relative to the first is between 0 and 720/n. However, those skilled in the art would recognize that the above limitations do not involve any inventive concept. They would merely depend on how one designs the rotation angle among the stator laminations. Furthermore, the instant specification fails to disclose any unexpected results obtained from the fact that the rotation angle of the last stator lamination among the plurality of stator laminations relative to the first is between 0 and 720/n. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the motor of Herbold, such that the rotation angle of the last stator lamination among the plurality of stator laminations relative to the first is between 0 and 720/n, to reduce torque ripple and improve magnetic efficiency. As to claim 20, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 4, wherein the stator core defines, in a radial inner portion thereof, an accommodation space for accommodating the rotor (Fig. 1), and the stator slots comprise opening portions leading to the accommodation space (Fig. 2), and the opening portions are inclined at a first inclination angle relative to the rotational axis (Fig. 2). PNG media_image5.png 704 523 media_image5.png Greyscale Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Herbold and in view of Kasper (WO 2023227464). As to claim 7, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 6. Herbold fails to disclose wherein the plurality of winding conductors comprise at least one or more of a first winding conductor, a second winding conductor and a third winding conductor, wherein the first winding conductor comprises the main body portion and winding end portions located at two ends of the main body portion; the second winding conductor comprises two main body portions respectively inserted into different stator slot, a connecting portion located at one end of each of the main body portions and connecting the two main body portions together, and two winding end portions respectively located at the other ends of the two main body portions; and the third winding conductor comprises a plurality of main body portions respectively inserted into different stator slots, wherein one main body portion is sequentially connected to front and rear main body portions at two ends thereof through connecting portions. Kasper discloses wherein the plurality of winding conductors comprise at least one or more of a first winding conductor, a second winding conductor and a third winding conductor (Fig. 4a), wherein the first winding conductor comprises the main body portion and winding end portions located at two ends of the main body portion (Fig. 4a); the second winding conductor comprises two main body portions respectively inserted into different stator slot (Fig. 4a), a connecting portion located at one end of each of the main body portions and connecting the two main body portions together (Fig. 4a), and two winding end portions respectively located at the other ends of the two main body portions (Fig. 4a); and the third winding conductor comprises a plurality of main body portions respectively inserted into different stator slots (Fig. 4a), wherein one main body portion is sequentially connected to front and rear main body portions at two ends thereof through connecting portions (Fig. 4a). PNG media_image7.png 531 458 media_image7.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the motor of Herbold with the plurality of winding conductors comprise at least one or more of a first winding conductor, a second winding conductor and a third winding conductor, wherein the first winding conductor comprises the main body portion and winding end portions located at two ends of the main body portion; the second winding conductor comprises two main body portions respectively inserted into different stator slot, a connecting portion located at one end of each of the main body portions and connecting the two main body portions together, and two winding end portions respectively located at the other ends of the two main body portions; and the third winding conductor comprises a plurality of main body portions respectively inserted into different stator slots, wherein one main body portion is sequentially connected to front and rear main body portions at two ends thereof through connecting portions, as disclosed by Kasper, to optimize power factor and efficiency. Claims 8-9, 14, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Herbold and in view of Kameda (WO 2023162403). As to claim 8, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 1. Harbold fails to disclose an insulating member inserted into the stator slot and accommodating the stator winding, wherein the insulating member is configured to fit the stator core in the stator slot. Kameda discloses an insulating member inserted into the stator slot and accommodating the stator winding, wherein the insulating member is configured to fit the stator core in the stator slot (“the stator 1 according to the present embodiment, between the stator core 2 and the rectangular wire coil 3, specifically, between the slot 7 of the stator core 2 and the slot insertion portion 3C of the rectangular wire coil 3, insulation is provided between the two. Insulating paper 8 can be included as an example of the insulating member. As for the specific material and shape of this insulating paper 8, well-known materials can be used”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the motor of Herbold with an insulating member inserted into the stator slot and accommodating the stator winding, wherein the insulating member is configured to fit the stator core in the stator slot, as disclosed by Kameda, to electrically isolate the windings from the laminations, resulting in improved performance. As to claim 9, the combination of Herbold and Kameda discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 8, wherein the insulating member is formed by folding insulating paper and has a twisted hexahedral shape (“As for the specific material and shape of this insulating paper 8, well-known materials can be used” Kameda). As to claim 14, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 2. Harbold fails to disclose an insulating member inserted into the stator slot and accommodating the stator winding, wherein the insulating member is configured to fit the stator core in the stator slot. Kameda discloses an insulating member inserted into the stator slot and accommodating the stator winding, wherein the insulating member is configured to fit the stator core in the stator slot (“the stator 1 according to the present embodiment, between the stator core 2 and the rectangular wire coil 3, specifically, between the slot 7 of the stator core 2 and the slot insertion portion 3C of the rectangular wire coil 3, insulation is provided between the two. Insulating paper 8 can be included as an example of the insulating member. As for the specific material and shape of this insulating paper 8, well-known materials can be used”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the motor of Herbold with an insulating member inserted into the stator slot and accommodating the stator winding, wherein the insulating member is configured to fit the stator core in the stator slot, as disclosed by Kameda, to electrically isolate the windings from the laminations, resulting in improved performance. As to claim 18, Herbold discloses the electrically excited synchronous motor according to claim 3. Harbold fails to disclose an insulating member inserted into the stator slot and accommodating the stator winding, wherein the insulating member is configured to fit the stator core in the stator slot. Kameda discloses an insulating member inserted into the stator slot and accommodating the stator winding, wherein the insulating member is configured to fit the stator core in the stator slot (“the stator 1 according to the present embodiment, between the stator core 2 and the rectangular wire coil 3, specifically, between the slot 7 of the stator core 2 and the slot insertion portion 3C of the rectangular wire coil 3, insulation is provided between the two. Insulating paper 8 can be included as an example of the insulating member. As for the specific material and shape of this insulating paper 8, well-known materials can be used”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the motor of Herbold with an insulating member inserted into the stator slot and accommodating the stator winding, wherein the insulating member is configured to fit the stator core in the stator slot, as disclosed by Kameda, to electrically isolate the windings from the laminations, resulting in improved performance. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ETHAN N VO whose telephone number is (571)270-7593. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:30am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M Koehler can be reached on 571 272 3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ETHAN NGUYEN VO/ Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /CHRISTOPHER M KOEHLER/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749946
Stator Arrangement and Electric Machine for a Motor Vehicle
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749953
MOTOR DRIVER CIRCUIT AND DRIVING METHOD, COOLING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS USING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744431
Circulation Sump Device for an Electric Drive Unit of a Vehicle
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738813
ELECTRIC DEVICE AND PUMP DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732064
HIGH-EFFICIENCY SELF-GENERATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+10.1%)
2y 6m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 62 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month