Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 19/029,831

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND POWER OFF METHOD OF A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Aug 28, 2017 — RE 10-2017-0108758 +4 more
Examiner
DEROSE, VOLVICK
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
573 granted / 635 resolved
+30.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
650
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
52.3%
+12.3% vs TC avg
§102
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 635 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 21-40 are presented for examination Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). Claims 21-40 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-15 and 17-21 of patent number 10725516. The table listed below shows the similarity between the two and highlight the differences. Instant Application 19029831 Patent 10725516 21. (New) A semiconductor device comprising: a first power source group including first and second power sources; a second power source group including a third power source; and a power sequence controller configured to perform power-on operations and power-off operations of the first to third power sources, wherein the power sequence controller is configured to: start a power-off operation of the first power source group at a first time, start a power-off operation of the second power source group in response to a representative power supply voltage of the first power source group reaching a first reference voltage before a first reference time elapses since the first time, and wherein the first reference voltage is greater than a power-off level of the first power source group. (currently amended): A semiconductor device comprising: a first power source group including first and second power sources; a second power source group including a third power source; and a power sequence controller configured to perform power-on operations and power-off operations of the first to third power sources, wherein the power sequence controller is configured to start the power- off operation of the first power source group at a first time, and to start the power-off operation of the second power source group when a first reference time has passed from the first time, wherein the power sequence controller is further configured to start the power-off operation of the second power source group when a power voltage of the first power source group drops to a first reference voltage before the first reference time has passed from the first time, and wherein the first reference voltage is greater than a power-off level of the first power source group. 26. (New) The semiconductor device of claim 25, wherein the first reference voltage is greater than the second reference voltage. 27. (New) The semiconductor device of claim 25, wherein the first reference time is different from the second reference time. 28. (New) The semiconductor device of claim 21, wherein the representative power supply voltage of the first power source group is a power supply voltage output by the first power source or the second power source. 29. (New) The semiconductor device of claim 21, wherein the first power source and the second power source of the first power source group are adjacent to one other. 32. (New) The semiconductor device of claim 30, wherein the power sequence controller comprises a comparator configured to output a signal indicative of whether the representative power supply voltage of the first power source group has reached the first reference voltage. 4. (currently amended): The semiconductor device of claim 3, wherein the first reference voltage is different than from the second reference voltage. 5. (currently amended): The semiconductor device of claim 4, wherein the second reference voltage is greater than the first reference voltage. 6. (currently amended): The semiconductor device of claim 3, wherein the first reference time is different than from the second reference time. 8. (original): The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the power voltage of the first power source group is one of a power voltage of the first power source and a power voltage of the second power source. 9. (original): The semiconductor device of claim 8, wherein a power- off time of the first power source is greater than a power-off time of the second power source. 10. (currently amended): The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the power sequence controller further comprises a first comparator configured to detect whether the power voltage of the first power source group is the first reference voltage. As shown from the table above, claims 1, 4-6, am 8-10 of patent 10725516 teaches the same concept of the instant application. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VOLVICK DEROSE whose telephone number is (571)272-6260. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jaweed Abbaszadeh can be reached on 571.270.1640. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VOLVICK DEROSE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2176
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699571
ELECTRONIC DEVICE BOOT METHOD AND APPARATUS, SERVER, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND MEDIUM
1y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12681549
AI-DRIVEN ELASTIC NETWORK TO REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681894
Method And System For Unloading Configuration Data In A Reconfigurable Processor Array
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681807
STORAGE DEVICE THAT BACKS UP DATA TO PAGE BUFFER IN LOW POWER MODE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE SAME
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12664120
DEVICE WITH DATA PROCESSING ENGINE ARRAY THAT ENABLES PARTIAL RECONFIGURATION
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.6%)
2y 2m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 635 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month